Semantic and pragmatic parameters: Split Intransitivity in German and Dutch

Shannon, Thomas F.

doi:10.1075/cilt.93.10sha

In:Recent Developments in Germanic Linguistics
Edited by Rosina L. Lippi-Green
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 93] 1992
► pp. 97–114

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

Split Intransitivity in German and Dutch

Semantic and pragmatic parameters

Thomas F. Shannon

Published online: 27 November 1992

https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.93.10sha

Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Order by:

Krogh, Simone & Liina Pylkkänen

2025. Manipulating syntax without taxing working memory: MEG correlates of syntactic dependencies in a verb-second language. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 40:10 ► pp. 1390 ff.

Kim, Songhee, Jeffrey R. Binder, Colin Humphries & Lisa L. Conant

2024. Decomposing unaccusativity: a statistical modelling approach. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 39:9 ► pp. 1189 ff.

Coussé, Evie

2014. Lexical expansion in the HAVE and BE perfect in Dutch. Diachronica 31:2 ► pp. 159 ff.

Arnett, Carlee & Susannah Martin

2004. Auxiliary Selection in the Present Perfect by L2 Students of German. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 37:2 ► pp. 148 ff.

Hens, Gregor

1997. Constructional Semantics in German: The Dative of Inaction. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 9:2 ► pp. 191 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.