Ellegård and Visser reconsidered: The origins of periphrastic Do

Denison, David

doi:10.1075/cilt.41.07den

In:Papers from the 4th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Amsterdam, April 10–13, 1985
Edited by Roger Eaton, Olga Fischer, Willem F. Koopman and Frederike van der Leek
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 41] 1985
► pp. 45–60

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

The origins of periphrastic Do

Ellegård and Visser reconsidered

David Denison

Published online: 1 January 1985

https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.41.07den

Cited by (21)

Cited by 21 other publications

Order by:

Breban, Tine, Kersti Börjars & Lorenzo Moretti

2025. Multiple source explanation in language change. Diachronica

Auer, Anita & Moragh S. Gordon

2024. Weaving data strands together. In Investigating West Germanic Languages [Studies in Germanic Linguistics, 8], ► pp. 164 ff.

Gotthard, Lisa

2024. Subject-verb agreement and the rise of do-support in the period of anglicisation of Scots. In Keys to the History of English [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 363], ► pp. 53 ff.

GOTTHARD, LISA

2025. The rise of Scots do – transfer or innovation?. English Language and Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff.

Oudesluijs, Tino

2023. Scribal Networks and the Language of Urban Administration. Linguistica 63:1-2 ► pp. 41 ff.

Moretti, Lorenzo

2022. A multivariate analysis of causativedoand causativemakein Middle English. Linguistics Vanguard 8:1 ► pp. 165 ff.

Moretti, Lorenzo

2023. The Functions of Auxiliary Do in Middle English Poetry: A Quantitative Study. Journal of English Linguistics 51:1 ► pp. 3 ff.

von Stutterheim, Christiane & Mary Carroll

2018. Texts as answers to questions. In Linguistic Foundations of Narration in Spoken and Sign Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 247], ► pp. 67 ff.

Lightfoot, David W.

2017. Transparency. In The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax, ► pp. 322 ff.

Biberauer, Theresa & Ian Roberts

2016. Parameter typology from a diachronic perspective. In Theoretical Approaches to Linguistic Variation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 234], ► pp. 259 ff.

Hancil, Sylvie

2013. Bibliographie. In Histoire de la langue anglaise, ► pp. 177 ff.

Lowrey, Brian & Fabienne Toupin

2010. L'invariant à l'épreuve de la diachronie1. Corela :8-2

PARGMAN, SHERI

2004. GULLAHDUHAND PERIPHRASTICDOIN ENGLISH DIALECTS: ANOTHER LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE. American Speech 79:1 ► pp. 3 ff.

Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott

2003. Grammaticalization,

Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou

2003. Syntactic Change,

Roger Lass

2000. The Cambridge History of the English Language,

Rissanen, Matti

2000. SYNTAX. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, ► pp. 187 ff.

Roberts, Ian

1995. Object Movement and Verb Movement in Early Modern English. In Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 31], ► pp. 269 ff.

Roberts, Ian

2017. Inertia. In The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax, ► pp. 425 ff.

Hope, By Jonathan

1990. APPLIED HISTORICAL LINGUISTICS: SOCIO‐HISTORICAL LINGUISTIC EVIDENCE FOR THE AUTHORSHIP OF RENAISSANCE PLAYS1. Transactions of the Philological Society 88:2 ► pp. 201 ff.

KOMA, OSAMU

1988. The auxiliary do in eighteenth-century English: A sociohistorical-linguistic approach. By INGRID TIEKEN-BOON VAN OSTADE. (Geschiedenis van de taalkunde.) Dordrecht: Foris, 1987. Pp. x, 257. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 5:0 ► pp. 361 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.