Cover not available

In:Mathematical Modelling in Linguistics and Text Analysis: Theory and applications
Edited by Adam Pawłowski, Sheila Embleton, Jan Mačutek and Aris Xanthos
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 370] 2025
► pp. 128–137

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

A comparative analysis of stylometry and authorship attribution in a creole and non-creole language

 | Duquesne University
 | Duquesne University
Published online: 13 October 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.370.11juo
Abstract
Stylometry, the computational study of writing style, has proven itself for answering questions of authorship in a wide variety of languages. However, previous research has focused on non-creole languages. Our previous work presented an analysis of 100 parliamentary speeches in seselwa and showed performance far above chance. We extend this analysis with a comparable corpus of standard (Québécois) French. No advantage was shown for either language. We conclude that there is no less complexity and stylistic variation in creole languages.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Stylometry
    • 2.2Creole languages
    • 2.3Seselwa
  • 3.Materials and methods
    • 3.1Materials
    • 3.2Methods
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusions and future work
  • References
References (20)
References
Ainsworth, Janet & Patrick Juola. 2019. Who wrote this?: Modern forensic authorship analysis as a model for valid forensic science. Washington University Law Review 96(5). 1161–1189.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, Roger T. 1976. Sociolinguistics: Goals, approaches and problems. London: Batsford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek. 1973. The nature of a creole continuum. Language 49(3). 640–669. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Binongo, J. N. G. 2003. Who wrote the 15th book of Oz? An application of multivariate analysis to authorship attribution. CHANCE 16(2). 9–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coulthard, Malcolm. 2004. Author identification, idiolect, and linguistic uniqueness. Applied Linguistics 25(4). 431–447. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel. 2005. Linguists’ most dangerous myth: The fallacy of creole exceptionalism. Language in Society 34(4). 533–591. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jourdain, C. 1991. Pidgins and Creoles: The Blurring of Categories. Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 20, pp. 187–209. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Juola, Patrick. 2008. Authorship attribution. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval 25(3). 233–334.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Juola, Patrick & Alexander J. Napolitano Jawerbaum. 2022. Stylometric authorship attribution in Seychellois Creole. DH_BUDAPEST_2022, Budapest, Hungary.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Juola, Patrick, John Sofko & Patrick Brennan. 2006. A prototype for authorship attribution studies. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 21(2). 169–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marsland, Stephen. 2015. Machine learning: An algorithmic perspective. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McMenamin, Gerald R. 2011. Declaration of Gerald R. McMenamin in support of defendants’ motion for expedited discovery, Paul D. Ceglia v. Mark Elliott Zuckerberg and Facebook, Inc., United States District Court, Western District of New York, filed June 2, 2011; Exhibit B, p2 ([URL])
McWhorter, John H. 1998. Identifying the Creole prototype: Vindicating a typological class. Language 74(4). 788–818. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology 5(2–3). 125–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mosteller, Frederick & David L. Wallace. 1963. Inference in an authorship problem. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58(302). 275–309.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo. 2011. Pidgins and creoles. In Manfred Pienemann & Jörg-U. Keßler (eds.), Studying processability theory, 106–120. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siegel, Jeff. 2008. The emergence of pidgin and creole languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A. & E. S. C. Weiner. 1989. The Oxford English Dictionary, Second Edition, Volume IV. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sylvain, Suzanne. 1936. Le créole haïtien: Morphologie et syntaxe. Wetteren, Belgium: de Meester.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue