In:Historical Linguistics 2022: Selected papers from the 25th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Oxford, 1–5 August 2022
Edited by Holly Kennard, Emily Lindsay-Smith, Aditi Lahiri and Martin Maiden
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 369] 2025
► pp. 150–165
Differential object marking in early Italo-Romance and old Sardinian
Published online: 7 April 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.369.10cen
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.369.10cen
Abstract
This paper explores the differential marking of objects (DOM) in two southern early Italo- Romance
vernaculars, namely old Sicilian and old Neapolitan, and in old Sardinian texts from two different areas, Logudoro and
Arborea. We investigate the constraints on the marking of objects, whether semantic, encoding the Individuation Hierarchy,
syntactic, determined by verbal valency and/or the position of the O argument in relation to the verb, or pragmatic, resulting
from the topicality of the object. We show that, unlike in old Neapolitan and old Sicilian, in old Sardinian Topicality and
the Person Hierarchy do not appear to play a role in the occurrence of the object marker
a(d).
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Differential object marking in Italo-Romance and Sardinian
- 3.Differential object marking in diachrony: Old Sicilian, old Neapolitan and old Sardinian
- 3.1Old Sicilian
- 3.2Old Neapolitan
- 3.3Differential object marking in old Sardinian
- 4.Conclusions
References
References (56)
Aissen, Judith. 2003. Differential
Object Marking: Iconicity vs. Economy. Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory 21. 435–83.
Blasco Ferrer, Eduardo. 1988. Le
parlate dell’alta Ogliastra: analisi dialettologica, saggio di storia linguistica e
culturale. Cagliari: Edizioni Della Torre.
(ed.). 2003. Crestomazia
Sarda dei Primi Secoli, Vol. 1. Testi — Grammatica
Storica-Glossario, Nuoro: Ilisso.
Boeddu, Daniela. 2017. Estudio
Diacrónico del acusativo preposicional sardo. PhD
thesis. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Universidad del País Vasco.
. 2020. The
Differential Object Marking of The Arborense Dialect of Sardinian in Language Contact
Setting. Jornal of Language
Contact 13, 17–56.
Bossong, Georg. 1982. Der
präpositionale Akkusativ im Sardischen. In Otto Winkelmann & Maria Braisch (eds), Festschrift
für Johannes Hubschmid zum 65.
Geburtstag, 579–99. Bern/München: Francke.
. 1998. Le
marquage différentiel de l’objet dans les langues
d’Europe. In Jack Feuillet (ed.), Actance
et valence dans les langues de
l’Europe, 193–258. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cennamo, Michela. 2003. (In)transitivity
and object marking: some current issues. In Fiorentino, Giuliana (ed.), Romance
Objects. Transitivity in Romance
Languages, 49–104. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2006. The
rise and grammaticalization paths of Latin fieri and facere as passive
auxiliaries. In Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds.), Passivization
and Typology: Form and
Function, 311–36. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 2009. Argument
structure and alignment variations and changes in late
Latin. In Jóhanna Barðdal & Shobhana Chelliah (eds.), The
Role of Semantic, Pragmatic, and Discourse Factors in the Development of
Case, 307–46. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 2018. Grammaticalization
and changes in argument linking: a case-study from old Logudorese
Sardinian. In Marina Chini & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds.), Tipologia,
acquisizione, grammaticalizzazione — Typology, acquisition, grammaticalization
studies, 96–117. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Cennamo, Michela, Francesco Maria Ciconte & Luigi Andriani. 2023. Syntactic
and semantic constraints on Differential Object Marking in Old
Sardinian. In Monica Alexandrina Irimia & Alexandru Mardale (eds.), Differential
Object Marking in
Romance, 103–131. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ciconte, Francesco Maria. 2018. Soggetto e oggetto
nell’italo-romanzo antico. Studi e Saggi
Linguistici LVI.1. 97–135.
Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language
Universals and Linguistic
Typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dalrymple, Mary. & Irina Nikolaeva. 2011. Objects
and Information Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Blasi, Nicola. 1998. Kampanien
/ Campania. In Günter Holtus, Michael Metzeltin & Christian Schmitt (eds.), Lexikon
der Romanistischen
Linguistik II, 174–189. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Fiorentino, Giuliana. 2003. Prepositional
objects in Neapolitan. In Giuliana Fiorentino (ed.), Romance
Objects. Transitivity in Romance
Languages, 117–51. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Floricic, Franck. 2020. Object
marking e predicazione possessiva in sardo
campidanese. In Eva-Maria Remberger, Maurizio Virdis & Birgit Wagner (eds.), Il
sardo in
movimento, 187–204. Vienna: Vienna University Press.
Givón, Talmy. 1978. Definiteness
and referentiality. In Joseph Greenberg (ed.), Universals
of Human Language, Syntax, vol.
4, 291–330. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Guardiano, Cristina. 2010. L’oggetto
preposizionale in siciliano. Una breve rassegna e qualche domanda. Quaderni di Lavoro
ASIt: 11. 95–115.
. 2023. Differential
Object Marking in a dialect of Sicily. In Monica Irimia & Alexandru Mardale (eds.), Differential
Object Marking in
Romance, 192–231. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Haude, Katharina & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich. 2016. Referential
hierarchies and alignment: An
overview. Linguistics 54.3. 433–41.
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity
in grammar and
discourse. Language 56.2. 251–99.
Iemmolo, Giorgio. 2009. La
marcatura differenziale dell’oggetto in siciliano antico. Archivio Glottologico
Italiano 94.2. 185–225.
. 2010. Topicality
and DOM: evidence from Romance and beyond. Studies in
Language 34. 239–72.
Iemmolo, Giorgio & Gerson Klumpp. 2014. Introduction
to the special issue ‘Differential Object Marking: theoretical and empirical
issues’. Linguistics 52(2). 271–9.
Irimia, Monica Alexandrina & Anna Pineda. 2019. Differential
object marking and scales: insights from Romance diachrony. Proceedings of the
LSA 4. 1–15.
. 2021. On
the setting of scales in the diachrony of Differential Object Marking. Journal of
Historical
Syntax 5. 1–41.
Jones, Michael Allan. 1995. The prepositional
accusative in Sardinian: its distribution and syntactic
repercussions. In John Charles Smith & Martin Maiden. (eds.), Linguistic
Theory and the Romance
Languages, 37–75. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
La Fauci, Nunzio. 1988. Oggetti
e Soggetti nella Formazione della Morfosintassi
Romanza, Pisa: Giardini.
. 1991. L’oggetto
con preposizione nei Confessionali Siciliani Antichi. Risultato di uno spoglio
sistematico. In Luciano Giannelli, Nicoletta Maraschio, Teresa Poggi Salani & Massimo Veovelli (eds), Tra
Rinascimento e Strutture Attuali. Saggi di Linguistica Italiana. Atti del Primo Convegno della Società Internazionale
di Linguistica e Filologia Italiana, Siena, 28–29 March
1989, 387–398. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.
. 2012. From
Latin to Romance: Morphosyntactic Typology and
Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2023a. Differential
object marking in the dialects of southern Italy. Cappletra. Revista Internacional de
Filologia 74. 1–36.
. 2023b. Parametric
variation in differential object marking in Italo —
Romance. In Monica Irimia & Alexandru Mardale (eds.), Differential
Object Marking in
Romance, 267–314. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ledgeway, Adam, Norma Schifano & Giuseppina Silvestri. 2019. Differential
Object Marking and the properties of D in the dialects of the extreme south of
Italy. Glossa: A journal of general
linguistics 4(1). 1–25.
Lombardi, Alessandra. 2007. Posizione
dei clitici e ordine dei costituenti della lingua sarda
medievale. In Adam Ledgeway & Delia Bentley (eds.), Sui
dialetti italoromanzi: Saggi in onore di Nigel B.
Vincent, 133–48. Norfolk: Biddles.
Manzini, Maria Rita & Leonardo Savoia. 2005. I
Dialetti Italiani e Romanci. Morfosintassi
Generativa. Alessandria: Edizioni Dell’Orso.
Mardale, Alexandru. 2008. Microvariation
within differential object marking: data from Romance. Revue Roumaine de
Linguistique 4. 448–67.
Mensching, Guido & Eva-Maria Remberger. 2016. Sardinian. In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), The
Oxford Guide to the Romance
Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Merci, Paolo (ed.). 1992. Il
Condaghe di San Nicola di Trullas. Testo Logudorese inedito dei secoli
XI-XIII. Sassari: Delfino.
Meyer-Lübke, Wilhelm. 1902. Zur
Kenntniss der Altlogudoresischen. Wien: Akademie der Wissenschaft, Band CXLV.
Næss, Åschild. 2007. Prototypical
Transitivity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Putzu, Ignazio. 2008. Per
uno studio dell’accusativo preposizionale in sardo antico: Emergenze dallo spoglio dei Condaghe di San Pietro
di Silki. In Romano Lazzeroni, Emanuele Banfi, Giuliano Bernini, Marina Chini & Giovanna Marotta (eds.), Diachronica
et synchronica: Studi in onore di Anna Giacalone
Ramat, 397–428. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.
Reynolds, Deborah. 2005. The
Distribution of the Prepositional Accusative in Neapolitan. BA
thesis, Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1969. Grammatica
Storica della Lingua Italiana e dei suoi
Dialetti, vol. III. Torino: Einaudi.
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy
of features and ergativity. In Robert Dixon (ed.), Grammatical
Categories in Australian
Languages, 112–71. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
Sornicola, Rosanna. 1997. L’oggetto
preposizionale in siciliano antico e in napoletano antico. Considerazioni su un problema di tipologia
diacronica. Italienische
Studien 18. 66–80.
Timberlake, Alan. 1977. Reanalysis
and actualization in syntactic change. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Mechanisms
of syntactic
change, 141–77. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Van Valin, Robert. 2005. Exploring
the Syntax-Semantics
Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
