Cover not available

In:Historical Linguistics 2022: Selected papers from the 25th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Oxford, 1–5 August 2022
Edited by Holly Kennard, Emily Lindsay-Smith, Aditi Lahiri and Martin Maiden
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 369] 2025
► pp. 110–127

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Dissimilatory constraints discriminate between variants in analogical change

 | CNRS (Langage, Langues et Cultures d’Afrique, UMR 8135)
Published online: 7 April 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.369.08esh
Abstract
This study presents evidence that dissimilatory constraints act as a discriminating factor in the selection of models for analogical change within inflectional paradigms. The study compares the lexical extension of root-final /ɡ/ in preterite forms in two groups of Occitan varieties: one group with established preterite desinences in -/εɡ/-, where introducing /ɡ/-final roots creates a sequence -/ɡεɡ/-; and another group with established preterite desinences in -/εɾ/-, where introducing /ɡ/-final roots creates a sequence -/ɡεɾ/-. Incidence of root-final /ɡ/ is lower in the velar desinence group than in the rhotic desinence group, indicating that dissimilatory pressure contributes to speaker choice between available roots, alongside other factors such as existing paradigmatic relationships and lexical gang effects.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Historical development of Occitan preterite forms
    • 2.1Development of typical modern preterite inflection with rhotic desinences
    • 2.2Development of localised preterite inflection with velar desinences
    • 2.3Development of a characteristic phonological shape for perfectum roots
    • 2.4A series of analogical changes
  • 3.Study design
  • 4.Overview of results
  • 5.Lexemes showing no areal contrast
    • 5.1Lexemes without root allomorphy
    • 5.2Lexemes with root-final /ɡ/ in modern perfectum reflexes
    • 5.3Lexemes without root-final /ɡ/ in modern perfectum reflexes
    • 5.4Lexemes showing variation between presence and absence of root-final /ɡ/
    • 5.5Trends apparent in the data
  • 6.Lexemes showing areal contrast
    • 6.1Root-final /ɡ/ never attested in velar desinence area
    • 6.2Root-final /ɡ/ less frequent in velar desinence area
    • 6.3Interim summary
  • 7.Asymmetry, paradigmatic relationships and the direction of analogy
  • 8.Discussion and conclusions
    • 8.1Theoretical foundations
    • 8.2Dissimilatory constraints in the diachrony of Occitan preterite forms
    • 8.3Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (26)
References
Alibèrt, Loís. 1976. Gramatica occitana segon los parlars lengadocians. Toulouse: Institut d’Estudis Occitans.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anglade, Joseph. 1921. Grammaire de l’ancien provençal ou ancienne langue d’oc. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blevins, James. 2016. Word and paradigm morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boisgontier, Jacques. 1981–1986. Atlas linguistique et ethnographique du Languedoc oriental. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Mary A. Brewer. 1980. Explanation in morphophonemics: Changes in Provençal and Spanish preterite forms. Lingua 52. 201–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015b. Formal asymmetries between the Romance synthetic future and conditional in the Occitan varieties of the Western Languedoc. Transactions of the Philological Society 113(2). 249–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021a. Hypercorrection and velar-to-labial change in Occitan preterites. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 137(1). 61–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021b. La diachronie du prétérit occitan à la lumière des sources textuelles. Linguistica Pragensia 31(2). 115–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021c. Perspettive comparative e storiche sulla flessione del preterito nelle parlate occitane della Provenza. Vox Romanica 80. 203–38.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feist, Timothy & Enrique Palancar. 2021. Paradigmatic restructuring and the diachrony of stem alternations in Chichimec. Language 97(1). 1–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lloret, Maria-Rosa. 2009. Changes in inflectional class as a means to repair phonology. In Fabio Montermini, Gilles Boyé & Jesse Tseng (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 6th Décembrettes, 22–34. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 1997. La dissimilation à la lumière des pronoms clitiques en roman. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 113(4). 531–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Phonological dissimilation and clitic morphology in Italo-Romance. In Lori Repetti (ed.), Phonological theory and the dialects of Italy, 169–89. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Verb augments and meaninglessness in Romance morphology. Studi di grammatica italiana 22. 1–61.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. The Romance verb: Morphomic structure and diachrony. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2012. The dynamic lexicon. In Abigail Cohn, Cécile Fougeron & Marie Huffman (eds.), The Oxford handbook of laboratory phonology, 173–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quint, Nicolas. 1996. Grammaire du parler occitan nord-limousin marchois de Gartempe et de Saint-Sylvain-Montaigut (Creuse). Limoges: La clau lemosina.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ravier, Xavier. 1978–1993. Atlas linguistique et ethnographique du Languedoc occidental. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ronjat, Jules. 1937. Grammaire istorique des parlers provençaux modernes, vol. 3. Montpellier: Société des Langues Romanes.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skårup, Povl. 1997. Morphologie élémentaire de l’ancien occitan. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory. 2016. Inflectional paradigms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wheeler, Max. 2011. The evolution of a morphome in Catalan verb inflection. In Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith, Maria Goldbach & Marc-Olivier Hinzelin (eds.), Morphological autonomy, 183–209. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Vies d’analogia i d’explicació en l’evolució del pretèrit feble de la conjugació-e romànica. Estudis Romànics 34. 7–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue