Cover not available

In:Historical Linguistics 2022: Selected papers from the 25th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Oxford, 1–5 August 2022
Edited by Holly Kennard, Emily Lindsay-Smith, Aditi Lahiri and Martin Maiden
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 369] 2025
► pp. 62–78

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Diachronic shifts among sound ideophones

 | Southern Illinois University Edwardsville
 | University of Ibadan
Published online: 7 April 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.369.05sch
Abstract
We assess the depictive and descriptive character of sound ideophones and their historical evolution in Emai of West Africa. Their initial depictive nature remains evident in phonological similarity to extant verbs with related meanings and retention of a perfective aspect mark. In their descriptive mode ideophones appear as synchronic adverbs that impact tonal marking within a clause. To account for their evolution from expressive acategorial forms to verbs, then to adverbs we rely on two constructions of cause-effect, one being resultative and the other aspectual extent. Via analogy each interacts with clausal expression of ideophonic forms leading to their recategorization and morphosyntactic integration into the contemporary grammatical system, particularly as it applies to information flow in traditional narrative discourse.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Lexical character of ideophonic forms
  • 3.Morphosyntactic character of ideophones
  • 4.Cause-effect and analogy in ideophone development
  • 5.Emai ideophones as adverb subclass
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Abbreviations
  • References
References (20)
References
Akita, Kimi. 2017. The linguistic integration of Japanese ideophones and its typological implications. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 62.2: 314–334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Akita, Kimi & Mark Dingemanse. 2019. Ideophones (Mimetics, Expressives). In Mark Aronoff (ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics, 1–18. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Childs, G. Tucker. 1989. Where do ideophones come from? Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 19.2: 55–76.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. African ideophones. In L. Hinton, J. Nichols & J. Ohala (eds.), Sound symbolism, 178–204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 2001. Setswana ideophones as uninflected predicative lexemes. In F. K. Erhard Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Katz. Ideophones, 75–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark. 2012. Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass 6/10: 654–672. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark & Kimi Akita. 2017. An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese. Journal of Linguistics 53.3: 501–532. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doke, C. M. 1935. Bantu Linguistic Terminology. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. & Ray Jackendoff. 2004. The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80.3: 532–568. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1990. Wiping the slate clean: A lexical semantic exploration. Cognition 41.123–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir. 1988. Typology of resultative constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newman, Paul. 1968. Ideophones from a syntactic point of view. Journal of West African Languages 5: 107–117.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Are ideophones really as weird and extra-systematic as linguists make them out to be? In F. K. Erhard Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Katz (eds.), Ideophones, 251–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samarin, William J. 1971. Survey of Bantu ideophones. African Language Studies 12: 130–168.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schaefer, Ronald P. & Francis O. Egbokhare (eds.) 1999. Oral tradition narratives of the Emai people, Part I and Part II. Hamburg: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. A dictionary of Emai: An Edoid language of Nigeria. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. A grammar of Emai. [Mouton Grammar Library Series]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Voeltz, F. K. Erhard & Christa Kilian-Katz (eds.). 2001. Ideophones. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Werner, Alice. 1919. Introductory sketch of the Bantu languages. London: Kegan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Westermann, D. H. 1927. Laut, ton und sinn in westafrikanischen Sudansprachen. In F. Boas (ed.), Festshrift Meinhof, 315–328. Hamburg: L. Friederichsen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue