In:The Boundary between Grammar and Lexicon: Evidence from Japanese verb morphology
Brent de Chene
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 368] 2025
► pp. 178–210
Chapter 7Explaining the choice of Analysis A
Published online: 3 February 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.368.c7
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.368.c7
Article outline
- 7.1Introduction
- 7.2Explanatory adequacy in morphophonology
- 7.3Hypotheses inconsistent with the choice of Analysis A
- 7.4Neutralizing choices of underlying representations
- 7.4.1Two case studies
- 7.4.2An alternative interpretation
- 7.5Type frequency, token frequency, and Analysis A
- 7.6Truncation and ð-Epenthesis in Modern Greek nominal inflection
- 7.6.1Hiatus at noun stem boundary
- 7.6.2ð-Epenthesis as a default: Standard Modern Greek
- 7.6.3ð-Epenthesis as a default: Anatolian dialects
- 7.6.4Explaining the default status of ð-Epenthesis
- 7.7The choice of Analysis A: Summary and conclusion
- 7.8r-Epenthesis as an exemplar of the stem-boundary epenthesis rule
Notes
