Cover not available

In:Recent Advances in Multiword Units in Machine Translation and Translation Technology
Edited by Johanna Monti, Gloria Corpas Pastor, Ruslan Mitkov and Carlos Manuel Hidalgo-Ternero
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 366] 2024
► pp. 156–172

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 9
The middle construction and some machine translation issues

Exploring the process of compositional cospecification in quality-oriented middles

 | Universidad de Córdoba
Published online: 7 November 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.366.09gut
Abstract
This paper aims at exploring the colloconstructional analysis of multiword units (MWU) in machine translation regarding the middle construction in terms of compositional cospecification (Yoshimura, 1998; Yoshimura & Taylor, 2004). For that purpose, I examine the Adverb + Verb collocation focusing on the predicates cut and drive, collocated with quality-oriented adjuncts (Heyvaert, 2003) and incorporating Inanimate Subject entities (Patients, Enablers and Instruments). The number of instances examined is 500+. The data analysed reveals that apart from the generalised Qt-Qc pattern in shift of semantic importance, other patterns (namely, Qc-Qc) can be found by virtue of the prototype effects of the construction (cf. Taylor, 1995), thus, providing a potential source of disambiguation in the computational treatment of MWU in machine translation.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology
  • 3.Tools for analysis: Qualia structure and the process of compositional cospecification
  • 4.Prototype effects in the middle construction: Examining certain issues within the process of machine translation of MWU
  • 5.Data collection and results
    • 5.1The case of drive middle instances
    • 5.2The case of cut middle instances
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (29)
References
Brdar, M. & Brdar Szabò, R. (1993). Functional Grammar and prototype theory: A case study from English, German, Croatian and Hungarian. Working Papers in Functional Grammar, 51, 1–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burzio, L. (1986). Italian syntax: A government binding approach. Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidse, K., & Heyvaert. L. (2007). On the middle voice: An interpersonal analysis of the English middle. Linguistics, 45(1), 37–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fagan, S. (1992). The syntax and semantics of middle constructions: A study with special reference to German. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fellbaum, C. (1985). Adverbs in agentless actives and passives. Papers from the Parasession on Causatives and Agentivity at the 20th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 21–31).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
González Romero, L. (2002). Estudio de Gramática Constrastiva: Las construcciones medias en inglés y español contemporáneas. Universidad de Huelva Publicaciones.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guerrero Medina, P. (2017). The English conative as a family of constructions: Towards a usage-based approach. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza, A. Luzondo Oyón, & P. Pérez Sobrino (Eds.), Constructing families of constructions: Analytical perspectives and theoretical challenges (pp. 277–299). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heyvaert, L. (2003). A cognitive-functional approach to nominalization in English. Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoekstra, T., & Roberts, I. (1993). Middle constructions in Dutch and English. In E. Reuland & W. Abraham (Eds.), Knowledge and language (vol. 2): Lexical and conceptual structure (pp. 183–120). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, M. A. (2010). Foundations of French syntax. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keyser, S. J., & Roeper, T. (1984). On the middle and ergative constructions in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 15(3), 381–416.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar. A basic introduction. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations. A preliminary investigation. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Longman Online Dictionary of Contemporary English, LDOCE (n. d.) Pearson [URL].
Marín Arrese, J. (2011). Spontaneous and facilitative events revisited. In P. Guerrero Medina (Ed.), Morphosyntactic alternations in English. Functional and cognitive perspectives (pp. 137–160). Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palma Gutiérrez, M. (2019). Semantic prosody in middle construction predicates: Exploring adverb + verb collocation in middles. In G. Corpas Pastor & R. Mitkov (Eds.), Computational and corpus-based phraseology (pp. 345–359). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). Prototype effects in the process of compositional cospecification in the middle construction. Revista de Estudios Interlingüísticos, 9, 157–172.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). A family-resemblance analysis of the middle construction: A functional-cognitive approach [Doctoral dissertation, University of Córdoba]. UCO Press.
Perlmutter, D. (1978). Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 4, 157–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, J. (1991). The generative lexicon. Computational Linguistics, 17(4), 409–441.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). The generative lexicon. MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosta, A. (1995). How does this sentence interpret? The semantics of English mediopassives. In B. Aarts & C. F. Meyer (Eds.), The verb in contemporary English: Theory and description (pp. 123–144). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sakamoto, M. (2001). The middle and related constructions in English: A cognitive network analysis. English Linguistics, 18(1), 86–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics (Vol. 1), Concept structuring systems. MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, J. (1995). Linguistic categorization. Prototypes in linguistic theory (2nd Ed.). Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, Y., Schuster, M., Chen, Z., Le, Q. V., & Norouzi, M. (2016). Google’s neural machine translation system: Bridging the gap between human and machine translation. Computer Science: Computation and Language, 2, 1–23.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yoshimura, K. (1998). Encyclopaedic structure of nominals and middle expressions in English. Kobe paper in Linguistics, 1, 112–140.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yoshimura, K., & Taylor J. (2004). What makes a good middle? The role of qualia in the interpretation and acceptability of middle expressions in English. English Language and Linguistics, 8(2), 293–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue