In:Keys to the History of English: Diachronic linguistic change, morpho-syntax and lexicography
Edited by Thijs Porck, Moragh S. Gordon and Luisella Caon
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 363] 2024
► pp. 120–141
Some philological implications of punctuation in editions of Middle English texts
Published online: 4 April 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.363.06ned
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.363.06ned
Abstract
This study investigates the use of editions with modernised punctuation for linguistic enquiries. While
previous studies have highlighted potential qualitative issues with using such editions, this study provides a
quantitative analysis in order to give insight into how often editions with modernised punctuation tend to deviate
from their manuscript’s punctuation. By doing so, this study provides further insight into how frequently the use of
such editions may potentially lead the linguistic scholar astray. This study reveals that a high proportion of the
punctuation marks encountered in the studied editions have no corresponding mark in the manuscript, ultimately
concluding that the use of such editions may have an impact on the current understanding of Middle English syntax and
text interpretation.
Keywords: punctuation, historical, modernisation, editing, Middle English, quantitative
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.A brief history of punctuation
- 3.Modernised punctuation: Uses, practices and complications
- 4.Method and materials
- 5.Results
- 5.1Punctuation in use
- 5.2Removals, additions, and correspondences
- 5.3Correspondences in translation
- 5.4Sentence-external marks
- 6.Conclusions
Notes References
References (62)
Allen, C. L. 1977. Topics
in diachronic English syntax (3110) [doctoral
dissertation, University of Massachusetts]. Doctoral Dissertations 1896 – February
2014. [URL]
Baldwin, S. R. & J. M. Coady. 1978. Psycholinguistic
approaches to a theory of punctuation. Journal of Reading
Behavior 10(4). 363–375.
Brie, F. 1913. Zwei
mittelenglische Prosaromane: The sege of Thebes und The sege of
Troye. Archiv für das Studium der neueren Sprachen und
Literaturen 130 (40–56). 269–285. Druck und verlag von George Westermann. [URL]
Brown Meech, S. 1935. Early
application of Latin grammar to English
author(s). Publications of the Modern Language Association
of
America 50(4). 1012–1032.
Calle Martín, J. & A. Miranda García. 2005. Editing
Middle English punctuation. The case of MS Egerton 2622 (ff.
136–152). International Journal of English
Studies 5(2). 27–44. [URL]
Clemoes, P. 1952. Liturgical
influence on punctuation in Late Old English and Early Middle English
manuscripts. Occasional
Papers 1. 3–22.
Donatus, A. 1857. Grammatici
latini: Vol. 4: Probi Donati Servii qvi fervntvr De arte grammatica
libri (H. Keil, ed.). Teubner. [URL]
Early English Text
Society. (n.d.). Guidelines
for editors. Early English Text Society. [URL]
Evans, J. & M. S. Serjeantson. 1933. English
mediaeval lapidaries. Humprey Milford, Oxford University Press.
Fischer, O., A. van Kemenade, W. Koopman & W. van der Wurff. 2004. The
syntax of early English. Cambridge University Press.
Griffin, N. E. 1907. The
Sege of Troye. Publications of the Modern Language
Association of
America 22(1). 157–200.
Hanna, R. 2013. Editing
texts with extensive manuscript
traditions. In V. Gillespie & A. Hudson (Eds.), Probable
truth, 111–129. Brepols.
Herrtage, S. J. H. 1879. The
early English version of the Gesta Romanorum. N. Trübner. [URL]
Horstman, C. 1895. Yorkshire
writers: Richard Hampole; an English father of the Church and his
followers. S. Sonnenschein; Macmillan. [URL]
Isidore of
Seville. 2006. The
Etymologies of Isidore of Seville (S. A. Barney, W. J. Lewis, J. A. Beach & O. Berghof, trans.). Cambridge University Press.
Jenkinson, H. 1926. Notes
on the study of English punctuation of the sixteenth
century. The Review of English
Studies 2(6). 152–158.
Kroch, A., A. Taylor & B. Santorini. 2000. The
Penn-Helsinki parsed corpus of Middle English (PPCME2), 2nd
edn., release 4
[CD-ROM]. Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. [URL]
Levinson, J. P. 1985. Punctuation
and the orthographic sentence: A linguistic analysis [Doctoral
dissertation, City University of New York]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Lewis, M. (1675). Plain,
and short rules for pointing periods, and reading sentences grammatically, with the great use of them …
n.p. [URL]
Lindsay, W. M. 1896. An
introduction to Latin textual emendation based on the text of
Plautus (A. Mahoney, ed.). Macmillan; Perseus Digital Library. [URL]
Lowth, R. 1762/1799. A
short introduction to English grammar with critical notes. R. Aitken. [URL] (Original
work published 1762)
Madden, F. (ed.). 1838. The
Old English versions of the Gesta Romanorum. W. Nicol, Shakespeare Press.
Martens, S., K. Beck & T. Zastrow. 2012/2020. Linguistic
tools: Automatic segmentation and annotation tools. In
CLARIN-D AP 5, CLARIN-D User
Guide, version
1.1. 73–95. CLARIN-D. [URL] (Original
work published 2012)
McCarren, V. P. & D. Moffat. (eds.). 1998. A
guide to editing Middle English. The University of Michigan Press.
Mitchell, B. 1980. The
dangers of disguise: Old English texts in modern
punctuation. The Review of English
Studies 31(124). 385–413.
n.a. 1790. A
collection of ordinances and regulations… John Nicols. [URL]
Nedelius, S. 2021. Changed
perspectives: On modernised punctuation in Middle English
texts [Unpublished doctoral
dissertation]. University of Oslo.
Perry, G. G. 1867. Religious
pieces in prose and verse. N. Trübner. [URL]
Pintzuk, S. & A. Taylor. 2006. The
loss of OV order in the history of
English. In A. van Kemenade & B. Los (Eds.), The
handbook of the history of
English, 249–278. Blackwell.
Probert, P. & S. Roussou. 2019. The
invention of the Greek prosodic signs. The Journal of
Hellenic
Studies 139. 125–146.
Robinson, I. 1998. The
establishment of modern English prose in the Reformation and the
Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press.
Santorini, B. 2016. Annotation
manual for the Penn Historical Corpora and the York-Helsinki Corpus of Early English
Correspondence. Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. [URL]
Swaen, A. E. H. 1943. The
booke of hawkyng after prince Edwarde Kyng of Englande and its relation to the book of St
Albans. Studia
Neophilologica 16(1). 1–32.
Taylor, A. & S. Pintzuk. 2012. The
effect of information structure on object position in Old English: A pilot
study. In A. Meurman-Solin, M. J. Lopez-Couso & B. Los (Eds.), Information
structure and syntactic change in the history of
English, 47–65. Oxford University Press.
Taylor, A., A. Warner, S. Pintzuk & F. Beths. 2003. The
York-Toronto-Helsinki parsed corpus of Old English prose
(YCOE). Oxford Text Archive; Oxford Text Archive. [URL]
The British
Museum. 1834. Catalogue
of manuscripts in the British Museum. Part I. The Arundel
manuscripts. The Trustees. [URL]
The Interedition Development
Group. 2010–2019. CollateX. [URL]
Thrax, D. 2016. Dionysius
Thrax: Grammar (J. Braarvig & A. Nesøen, trans.). Bibliotheca Polyglotta Graeca et Latina. [URL]
Ullmann, J. 1884. Studien
zu Richard Rolle of Hampole. Englische
Studien 7. 415–472. [URL]
Warner, R. 1791. Antiquitates
culinariae; or, curious tracts relating to the culinary affairs of the old
English. R. Blamire, Strand. [URL]
Wright, T. & J. O. Halliwell. 1841/1845. Reliquiae
antiquae. Scraps from ancient manuscripts, illustrating chiefly early English literature and the English
language, vol. 1. J.R.
Smith. [URL] (Original
work published 1841)
