In:Advances in Iranian Linguistics II
Edited by Simin Karimi, Narges Nematollahi, Roya Kabiri and Jian Gang Ngui
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 361] 2023
► pp. 282–306
Chapter 11The nature and licensing of hi:tʃ elements in Persian
Published online: 14 April 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.361.11sto
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.361.11sto
Abstract
This paper examines the nature of elements such as hi:tʃkӕs “anyone” in Persian, which have been described as either Negative Polarity Items (Taleghani 2006) or Negative Concord Items (Kwak 2010) in prior literature. Such claims have typically been used to motivate analyses of Persian NegP as being high in the clause structure, above TP. This is in contrast to more recent analyses which have argued for a low position of negation (Kahnemuyipour 2017). Here, we present experimental evidence showing that c-commanding negation is not sufficient for licensing hi:tʃ elements, unlike English any. We also show that hi:tʃ elements have many properties in common with similar elements in Japanese and Korean, where there is less certainty in designating these as Negative Concord Items, and where negation is independently argued to be low. Thus, we claim, the distribution of hi:tʃ elements cannot be upheld as a proof of syntactically high negation, under either a polarity item or concord item analysis. We close the paper with a typological discussion, suggesting that the properties of hi:tʃ elements and their kin seem to be broadly shared among OV languages more generally.
Keywords: syntax, semantics, negation, negative polarity, negative concord
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Persian negation and hi:tʃ element licensing
- 2.1An overview of Persian negation
- 2.2Reconsidering hi:tʃ-elements
- 3.Experimental study
- 3.1Participants
- 3.2Stimuli
- 3.3Procedure
- 3.4Data analysis
- 3.5Results
- 4.Discussion
- 5.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes Abbreviations References
References (21)
Crain, Stephen, & Rosalind Thornton. 1998. Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Darzi, Ali. 1996. Word order, NP movements, and opacity conditions in Persian. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois dissertation.
Faghiri, Pegah, & Pollet Samvelian. 2016. How much structure is needed: The case of the Persian VP. In Arnold, Doug, Miriam Butt, Berthold Crysmann, Tracy Holloway King & Stefan Müller (eds.), Joint Conference on head-driven phrase structure grammar and lexical functional grammar. Warsaw: Polish Academy of Sciences, 236–254. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Ghomeshi, Jila. 2001. Control and thematic agreement. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 46(1–2). 9–40.
Han, Chung-hye, Jeffrey Lidz & Julien Musolino. 2007. Verb-raising and grammar competition in Korean: Evidence from negation and quantifier scope. Linguistic Inquiry 38(1). 1–47.
Horn, Laurence R. 2005. Airport’86 revisited: Toward a unified indefinite any. In Gregory Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds.), The Partee Effect, 179–205. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan. 2017. Negation is low in Persian: evidence from nominalization. Paper presented to the Canadian Linguistic Association (CLA). [URL] (3 October, 2022)
. 2019. The CP-vP parallelism: Evidence from (some) Iranian languages. Paper presented to the Second North American Conference on Iranian Linguistics (NACIL 2).
Karimi, Simin. 2005. A minimalist approach to scrambling: Evidence from Persian. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
. 2018. Generative approaches to syntax. In Sedighi, Anousha & Pouneh Shabani-Jadidi (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Persian Linguistics, 161–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kim, Shin-Sook. 2002. Intervention effects are focus effects. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 10. 615–628.
Kuno, Masakazu. 2008. Negation, focus, and negative concord in Japanese. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 28. 195–211.
Lichte, Timm & Laura Kallmeyer. 2006. Licensing German negative polarity items in LTAG. The International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammar and Related Formalisms 8. 81–90.
Özgen, Murat & Özgür Aydın. 2016. What type of defective feature do exceptionally case-marked clauses of Turkish bear? Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 6. 302–316.
Sells, Peter, & Shin-Sook Kim. 2006. Korean NPIs scope over negation. Language Research 42. 275–297.
Shafiei, Nazila. Manuscript. Persian quantifiers and their scope. Ms. Stony Brook University. [URL] (22 October, 2020)
Shafiei, Nazila & Dennis Ryan Storoshenko. 2017. Scope as a diagnostic for the position of negation in Persian. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 23.1: Annual Penn Linguistics Conference 40. 241–250.
Shimoyama, Junko. 2011. Japanese indeterminate negative polarity items and their scope. Journal of Semantics 28. 413–450.
Taleghani, Azita Hojatollah. 2006. The interaction of modality, aspect and negation in Persian. Tucson, Arizona: University of Arizona dissertation.
