In:Advances in Iranian Linguistics II
Edited by Simin Karimi, Narges Nematollahi, Roya Kabiri and Jian Gang Ngui
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 361] 2023
► pp. 100–129
Chapter 4Middle Persian Ezafe
Published online: 14 April 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.361.04sam
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.361.04sam
Abstract
This chapter describes one phase of the historical development of the “Ezafe” morpheme, a significant feature of Western Iranian languages. Ezafe is argued to have arisen in Middle Persian (MP) by a reanalysis of the Old Persian relative pronoun ‘haya’ due to a preponderance of copula-less clauses. It is shown that the distribution of Ezafe in MP resembles that in its modern descendants, but differing in three key respects: (i) MP Ezafe is an independent morpheme, and not a clitic; (ii) it appears to form a constituent with its following phrase; and (iii) it patterns like a preposition in various respects. This distribution, coupled with its emergence in the period when the Old Persian case system was disappearing and core functional prepositions were coming into the language, strongly suggests that Ezafe had the status of a genitive preposition in MP comparable to English ‘of’. We conclude with some interesting questions for further research raised by these results.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The historical emergence of Ezafe
- 2.1Old Persian and transition
- 2.2The genesis of Ezafe in Middle Persian
- 3.The distribution of Ezafe in Middle Persian
- 3.1Ezafe in the Middle Persian NP
- 3.1.1Nouns and nominal complement [NP N ez NP]
- 3.1.2Noun and adjectival modifier [NP N ez AP*]
- 3.1.3Noun, adjectival modifier and noun complement [NP N ez AP ez NP]
- 3.1.4Noun and prepositional phrase [NP N ez PP]
- 3.1.5Noun and relative clause [NP N ez CP]
- 3.2Ezafe in the Middle Persian PP
- 3.2.1Subgroup 1 [PP P NP]
- 3.2.2Subgroup 2 [PP P ez NP]
- 3.1Ezafe in the Middle Persian NP
- 4.The grammatical status of Middle Persian Ezafe
- 4.1Middle Persian Ezafe is a free morpheme
- 4.2Middle Persian Ezafe constituency
- 4.3The category of Middle Persian Ezafe
- 5.Questions for future research
Acknowledgements Notes Abbreviations References
References (38)
Adams, James. 1976. A typological approach to Latin word order. Indogermanische Forschungen 81. 70–99.
Bauer, Brigitte. 1995. The emergence and development of SVO patterning in Latin and French. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cantera, Alberto. 2009. On the history of the Middle Persian nominal inflection. In Von Werner Sundermann, Almut Hinze & Francois de Blois (eds.), Exegisti monumenta – Festschrift in honour of Nicholas Sims-Williams, Iranica 17. 17–30. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in linguistics, 1–52. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Estaji, Azam. 2009. Morphosyntactic changes in Persian and their effects on the syntax. In Bubenik, Vit, John Hewson & Sarah Rose (eds.), Grammatical change in Indo-European languages, 195–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Farshidvard, Khosrow. 1382/2003. Extensive current grammar [dastur-e mofasal-e emruz]. Sokhan Press. Tehran, Iran.
Jügel, Thomas. 2015. Die Entwicklung der Ergativkonstruktion im Alt- und Mitteliranischen – Eine korpusbasierte Untersuchung zu Kasus, Kongruenz und Satzbau. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
. 2016. Enclitic pronouns in Middle Persian and the placeholder construction. Quarterly Journal of Language and Inscription 1(1). 41–63.
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan. 2014. Revisiting the Persian Ezafe construction: A roll-up movement analysis. Lingua 150. 1–24.
Karimi, Simin & Michael Brame. 1986. A generalization concerning the Ezafe construction in Persian. Western Conference in Linguistics (WECOL 86), Vancouver, Canada.
. 2012. A generalization concerning the Ezafe construction in Persian. Linguistic Analysis 38. 111–144.
Lakoff, George. 1972. Another look at drift. In Robert Stockwell & Ronald Macaulay (eds.), Linguistic change and generative theory, 172–98. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Larson, Richard & Vida Samiian. 2020a. Ezafe, PP and the nature of nominalization. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.
. 2020b. Ezafe Construction revisited. In Richard Larson, Sedigheh Moradi & Vida Samiian (eds.) Advances in Iranian Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ledgeway, Adam. 2012. From Latin to Romance: Morphosyntactic typology and change. New York: Oxford University Press.
Marzbanrad, Ali. 1358/1979. Effective Grammar (dastur-e sudmand). National University Press. Tehran, Iran.
Mazdapur, Katayun. 1990. Shayest Nashayest. Moassesseye Motaleat va Tahghighate Farhangi. Tehran, Iran.
Molinelli, Piera. 1998. Dai casi alle preposizioni in latino: Analisi sociolinguisticae spiegazione tipologica. In Ramat & Roma (eds.), 147–66.
Pinkster, Harm. 2015. Cases and prepositions. In The Oxford Latin Syntax, vol. I. 1176–1242. Harm Pinkster, ed. Oxford University Press. UK.
1968. Grammar of Middle Persian, 2nd edn. Translated by Valiolah Shadan. Entesharate Bonyade Farhange Iran. Tehran.
Sadeghi, Ali Ashraf. 2016/1395. Kasre-ye Ezafe be jay-e [ke] mosul. VizheName-ye Farhangestan No. 11.
Samiian, Vida. 1994. The Ezafe construction: Some implications for the theory of X-bar syntax. In Mehdi Marashi (ed.), Persian Studies in North America, 17–41. Bethesda, MD: Iranbooks.
Skjærvø, Prods Oktor. Pahlavi Primer. Online
. 1983. “Case in inscriptional Middle Persian, inscriptional Parthian and Pahlavi Psalter” Studia Iranica, 47–62, 151–81.
. 2009. Middle Persian. 196–279. In Gernot Windfuhr (ed.), The Iranian Languages. Florence: Routledge.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
