Cover not available

In:Points of Convergence in Romance Linguistics: Papers selected from the 48th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL 48), Toronto, 25-28 April 2018
Edited by Gabriela Alboiu and Ruth King
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 360] 2022
► pp. 177–192

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 10
Interpreting reduplicated numerals in Old Ibero-Romance

A syntactic account

 | University of Birmingham
Published online: 10 March 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.360.10cor
Abstract
Old Ibero-Romance reduplicated numerals in transfer and possession constructions force a distributive reading at the sentential level (OSp. los pecheros deben tres tres meajas “the taxpayers owe three meajas each”). I argue that the distributive construction is best accounted for at the clausal level by an applicative structure (Pylkkänen 2008), where the reduplicated numeral is the internal argument and is encoded at the nominal level by a dedicated distributive layer in the extended functional structure. This analysis captures differences in the construction’s interpretation—a low ApplP for distribution over individuals, and a high ApplP for distribution over events—within a more general theory of event structure, and situates the distributive construction with a wider taxonomy of (independently-motivated) Ibero-Romance applicative structures.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Background
    • 1.2Data and sources
  • 2.Syntactic environments
  • 3.Accounting for Old Ibero-Romance DDNR
    • 3.1Ditransitive constructions
    • 3.2Extending the analysis
    • 3.3A unified analysis
  • 4.A distributive analysis
    • 4.1Accounting for Old Ibero-Romance RedNum
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (38)
References
Balusu, Rahul. 2005. Distributive reduplication in Telugu. In Christopher Davis, Amy Rose Deal & Youri Zabbal (eds.), Proceedings of the thirty-six annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 36), 39–53. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beghelli, Filippo & Tim Stowell. 1997. Distributivity and negation: The syntax of each and every. In Anna Szabolsci (ed.), Ways of scope taking, 71–107. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin. 2010. Double object constructions disguised as prepositional datives. Linguistic Inquiry 41(2). 287–305. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian syntax: A government-binding approach. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cable, Seth. 2014. Distributive numerals and distance distributivity in Tlingit (and beyond). Language 90. 562–606. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Choe, Jae-Woong. 1987. Anti-quantifiers and a theory of distributivity. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst dissertation.
Corr, Alice. 2018. Old Ibero-Romance reduplicated numerals and distance distributivity. Workshop on (Co-)Distributivity 2018, Université Paris 8, France, 22–23 February.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Distributive reduplication in Old Spanish numerals. Talk given at Department of Spanish and Portuguese, University of California, Los Angeles. 12 March.
Cuervo, María Cristina. 2003. Datives at large. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
Demonte, Violeta. 1995. Dative alternation in Spanish. Probus 7(1). 5–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donazzan, Marta & Ana Lúcia Müller. 2015. Reduplicated numerals as pluractionals: Distributivity as a window to the individuation of events. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 14. 95–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freeze, Ray. 1992. Existentials and other locatives. Language 68. 553–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gil, David. 1988. Georgian reduplication and the domain of distributivity. Linguistics 26. 1039–1066. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Distributive numerals. In Matthew Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures, 226–229. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana. 1997. The categorial status of determiners. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), The new comparative syntax, 95–123. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth & Samuel Jay Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in honour of Sylvain Bromberger, 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 1995. Subjects, events, and licensing. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
. 2002. Possession and the double object construction. Yearbook of Linguistic Variation 2. 29–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Hyun Kyoung Jung. 2015. In support of the Phave analysis of the double object construction. Linguistic inquiry 46(4). 703–730. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horcajada Diezma, Baustista & Pedro Sánchez-Prieto Borja. 1999. La reduplicación distributiva del numeral y el arabismo morfosintáctico en el romance hispánico medieval. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 115. 280–299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1993. Toward a modular theory of auxiliary selection, Studia Linguistica 47. 3–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109–137. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam. 2012. From Latin to Romance: Morphosyntactic typology and change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania working papers in linguistics 4(2). 14. 201–225.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morujão, Maria do Rosário Barbosa. 2010. Testamenti ecclesiae portugaliae, 1071–1325. Lisbon: Universidade Católica Portuguesa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ouwayda, Sarah. 2014. Where number lies: Plural marking, numerals, and the collective-distributive distinction. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California dissertation.
Pineda, Anna. 2013. Double object constructions and dative/accusative alternations in Spanish and Catalan: A unified account. Borealis. 2(1). 57–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pineda, Anna & Carles Royo. 2017. Differential indirect object marking in Romance (and how to get rid of it). Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 62(4). 445–462.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M. 1974. On raising. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ribeiro, Joao Pedro. 1798. Observações históricas e críticas. Lisbon: Academia Real das Sciencias de Lisboa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Safir, Ken & Tim Stowell. 1988. Binominal each. In J. Blevins & J. Carter (eds.), Proceedings of North East Linguistics Society (NELS) 18, 426–450. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sánchez-Prieto Borja, Pedro & Bautista Horcajada Diezma. 1994. La reduplicación del numeral en textos medievales: ¿una estructura distributiva en castellano antiguo? Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 110. 146–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silva Villar, Luis. 2015. Origen de las estrategias distributivas por reduplicación en espanol y portugués antiguos. European Scientific Journal, Special Edition Volume 1, 191–199.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stowell, Tim. 2013. Binominal each: A DP that may not be. In Kook-Hee Gil, Stephen Harlow & George Tsoulas (eds.), Strategies of quantification, 260–294. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torres Morais, Maria Aparecida & Heloisa Maria Lima-Salles. 2016. The external possessor construction in European Portuguese and Brazilian Portuguese. In Mary A. Kato & Francisco Ordóñez (eds), The morphosyntax of Portuguese and Spanish in Latin America, 204–235. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wright, Roger. 2010. Bilingualism and diglossia in medieval Iberian (350–1350). In Fernando Cabo Aseguinolaza, Anxo Abuín González & César Domínguez (eds.), A comparative history of literatures in the Iberian Peninsula, 333–350. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte. 2002. Boys buying two sausages each: On the syntax and semantics of distance-distributivity. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Corr, Alice
2022. Numeral Reduplication and Clausal Syntax: Grammaticalized Distributivity in Medieval Iberia. Probus 34:2 ► pp. 317 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue