In:Points of Convergence in Romance Linguistics: Papers selected from the 48th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL 48), Toronto, 25-28 April 2018
Edited by Gabriela Alboiu and Ruth King
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 360] 2022
► pp. 163–176
Chapter 9French ne … que exceptives in prepositional contexts
Published online: 10 March 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.360.09aut
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.360.09aut
Abstract
A common assumption in the literature is that French (ne) … que exceptives cannot appear inside a prepositional phrase. In this chapter we examine in some detail three contexts that counterexemplify this generalization. We show that in all cases, the data are consistent with the relatively recent hypothesis that (ne) … que exceptives contain a silent n-word (O’Neill 2011; Homer 2015; Authier & Reed 2019; Authier 2020). We also demonstrate that whenever an exceptive appears within a prepositional phrase, it is unable to take sentential scope. We provide three pieces of evidence that support this conclusion. First, PP-internal exceptives go hand in hand with the obligatory absence of the (optional) sentential negative scope marker ne. Second, PP-internal exceptives, unlike their PP-external counterparts, are unable to scope over modals in the clause in which they appear. Third, PP-internal exceptives, unlike their PP-external counterparts, do not license negative concord readings when they co-occur with a clause-mate n-word. These properties reveal the existence of a novel constraint that is not easily subsumed under existing theories of scope. That is, it seems that the combination of an exceptive’s quantificational component (i.e., its n-word) with its association with focus property is such that any PP that contains it acts as a scope island.
Keywords: exceptives, focus, negative concord, prepositions, scope island
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Prepositional exceptives
- 3.Covert rien and negative concord in prepositional contexts
- 4.Concluding remarks
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (14)
Authier, J.-Marc. 2020. On the comparative analysis of French (ne) … que exceptives. Probus 32. 1–54.
Authier, J.-Marc & Lisa Reed. 2019. Identifying phonologically overt counterparts to silent elements: The case of French exceptives. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 25(1) 21–29.
Damourette, Jacques & Edouard Pichon. 1943. Des mots à la pensée. Essai de grammaire de la langue française [1911–1940] tome sixième. Paris: d’Artrey.
Déprez, Viviane. 1999. The roots of negative concord in French and French based creoles. In Michel DeGraff (ed.), Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony and development, 375–428. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gaatone, David. 1999. Réflexions sur la syntaxe de ne … que. In Marc Plénat, Michel Aurnague, Anne Condamines, Jean-Pierre. Maurel, Christian Molinier & Claude Muller (eds.), L’emprise du sens. Structures linguistiques et interprétations. Mélanges de syntaxe et de sémantique offerts à Andrée Borillo par un groupe d’amis, de collègues et de disciples, 101–115. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Her, One-Soon & Hui-Chin Tsai. 2015. On silent elements: A case study of grand and its silent entourage. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33. 575–605.
Homer, Vincent. 2015. Ne … que and its challenges. In Ulrike Steindl, Thomas Borer, Huilin Fang, Alfredo García Pardo, Peter Guekguezian, Brian Hsu, Charlie O’Hara & Iris Chuoying Ouyang (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 32), 111–120. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
