Cover not available

In:Points of Convergence in Romance Linguistics: Papers selected from the 48th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL 48), Toronto, 25-28 April 2018
Edited by Gabriela Alboiu and Ruth King
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 360] 2022
► pp. 143–160

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 8
On the interpretation of the Spanish 1st person plural pronoun

 | Universidad de Sevilla
 | Western Michigan University
Published online: 10 March 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.360.08jim
Abstract
We explore the connection between the clause left periphery and the referential values of inclusion or exclusion of the addressee associated with Spanish 1st Person Plural pronoun nosotros, otherwise morphologically marked in many world languages. We examine the referential values of nosotros in clauses marked with different topics and foci regarding the inclusive/exclusive interpretation of the pronoun. We observe, contra Posio (2012), that overt nosotros doesn’t always involve exclusivity. The exclusive interpretation of the pronoun is nonetheless required in contexts typically declarative and non-contrastive (i.e., out-of-the-blue, thetic), and its overt use is perceived as odd if the Addressee is intended to be included. In Aboutness-Shift Topic and Given Topic contexts the clusive interpretation of the pronoun is obtained from the immediate context (i.e., whether the Addressee is active). Similarly, contrastive topics or foci include the presence of the Addressee in the immediate context as one of their points of contrast. To account for the influence of the immediate context on the interpretation of the pronominal values of clusivity we propose an analysis based on the projection of a Speech Act Phrase (SAP) (Speas & Tenny 2003) in combination with a Logophoric Center (Bianchi 2003) above the clausal left periphery (CP). In our analysis, the pronoun nosotros has an [Addressee] feature that is valued according to the availability of the Addressee in the left-most left periphery. Our formalization of clusivity assumes that interpretation is read off syntax (Haegeman & Hill 2013).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background and data
    • 2.1The use of Spanish subject pronouns and their IS
      • a.Topics
      • b.Foci
    • 2.2The pronominal interpretation of discourse participants
    • 2.3The expression of clusivity
  • 3.Information structure does not determine clusivity
    • 3.1Topics
      • 3.1.1Aboutness-Shift Topics
      • 3.1.2Contrastive Topics
      • 3.1.3Given Topics
    • 3.2Foci
      • 3.2.1Mirative foci
      • 3.2.2Contrastive foci
      • 3.2.3Information foci
    • 3.3Summary
  • 4.Speech act projection and the speaker/addressee relation
    • 4.1A logophoric center and a speech act phrase
    • 4.2Further evidence for SAP
    • 4.3Consequences in informatively unmarked contexts
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • Gloss key
  • References
References (30)
References
Benveniste, Émile. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina. 2003. On finiteness as logophoric anchoring. In Jaqueline Guéron & Liliane Tasmovski (eds.), Tense and point of view, 213–246. Paris: University of Paris X Nanterre.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina, Giuliano Bocci & Silvio Cruschina. 2015. Focus fronting and its implicatures. In Enoch Aboh, Jeannette Schaeffer & Petra Sleeman (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2013, 3–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Camacho-Taboada, Victoria, Ángel L. Jiménez-Fernández & Susana López-Rueda. 2016. The acquisition of null/explicit subject pronouns in Spanish as L2 by English speakers. In Bozena Cetnarowska, Marcin Kuczok & Marcin Zabawa (eds.), Various dimensions of contrastive studies, 310–332. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Slaskiego.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Cock, Barbara. 2011. Why we can be you: The use of 1st person plural forms with hearer reference in English and Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 43. 2762–2775. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville. 2000. Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael. 2002. Interpreting typological clusters, Linguistic Typology 6(1). 69–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’Alessandro, Roberta. 2007. Impersonal “si” constructions: Agreement and interpretation. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delfitto, Dennis & Gaetano Fiorin. 2014. Indexicality and left-periphery. Rivista di Linguistica 26(1). 59–92.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Di Tullio, Ángela. 2016. La primera persona del plural: una forma hipercaracterizada, talk delivered at XIV Encuentro Internacional de Lingüística en el Noroeste. Hermosillo.
Fernández-Soriano, Olga. 1999. El pronombre personal. Formas y distribuciones. Pronombres átonos y tónicos. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española I, 1209–1274. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Roland Hinterhölzl. 2007. Types of topics in German and Italian. In Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds.), On information structure, meaning and form, 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Virginia Hill. 2013. The syntactization of discourse. In Raffaella Folli, Christina Sevdali & Robert Truswell (eds.), Syntax and its limits, 370–390. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Elizabeth Ritter. 2002. Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78(3). 484–526. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L. 2015. Towards a typology of focus: Subject position and microvariation at the discourse-syntax interface. Ampersand 2. 49–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016. When discourse met null subjects. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 5(2). 173–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2006. Association with focus phrases. In Valeria Molnár & Susanne Winkler (eds.), The architecture of focus, 105–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Chungmin. 2006. Contrastive (predicate) topic, intonation, and scalar meanings. In Chungmin Lee, Matt Gordon & Daniel Buring (eds.), Topic and focus: Crosslinguistic perspectives on meaning and intonation, 151–175. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2017. Agreement beyond phi. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noyer, Robert. 1992. Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
Ortega-Santos, Iván. 2016. A formal analysis of lip-pointing in Latin-American Spanish. Isogloss 2(2). 113–128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peškova, Andrea. 2014. Sujetos pronominales en el español porteño: Implicaciones pragmáticas en la interfaz sintáctico-fonológica [Pronominal subjects in Porteño Spanish: Pragmatic Implications at the syntax-phonology interface]. Hamburg, Germany: University of Hamburg dissertation.
Posio, Pekka. 2012. The functions of postverbal pronominal subjects in spoken Peninsular Spanish and European Portuguese. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 5(1). 149–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Real Academia Española y Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española. 2009. Nueva gramática de la lengua española (NGRAE). Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speas, Peggy. 2000. Evidentiality, logophoricity and the syntactic representation of pragmatic features. Lingua 14. 255–276.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speas, Peggy & Carol Tenny. 2003. Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Anna Maria Disciullo (ed.), Asymmetry of grammar, 315–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woods, Rebecca. 2014. The syntax of orientation shifting: Evidence from English high adverbs. In Martin Kohlberger, Kate Bllamy & Eleanor Dutton (eds.), CONSOLE XXII: Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Student Organization of Linguistics in Europe, 205–230. Leiden, Netherlands: The Leiden University Centre for Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, María Luisa. 1998. Word order, prosody and focus. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Martínez Celis, Andrea
2024. Analysis of Interviews. In Human Values and Intercultural Competence in Internationalised Universities, ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue