Cover not available

In:Points of Convergence in Romance Linguistics: Papers selected from the 48th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL 48), Toronto, 25-28 April 2018
Edited by Gabriela Alboiu and Ruth King
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 360] 2022
► pp. 35–56

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 2
A child’s view of Romance modification

 | University of Toronto
Published online: 10 March 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.360.02per
Abstract
Languages vary as to what kind of phrasal categories allow recursive iteration of self-same embedding. Children first learn an embedding rule, then must learn whether the rule can apply recursively or not. However, direct experience of recursive embedding is rare in the input. A study of recursive nominal modification in Spanish show children acquire different types of modification (possession, part-whole relations) at different times even if these are expressed with the same preposition de. This suggest that the domain of rule formulation is narrower than syntactic category (PPs) or even lexical particle (de). Bilingual children show delays in acquiring a first level of embedding rule but not in allowing the rule to be recursive. This suggests that learning recursive modification is not sensitive to the concomitant reductions in input in bilingual contexts. I argue that children learn that embedding rules are recursive by inference from the productivity of simple embedding rules. The evidence on the acquisition of recursive nominal modification points to the limitations of the parameter setting model of syntactic development.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.UG then and now: How generative approaches neglected grammatical learning
  • 3.Recursion as a learning problem
  • 4.Acquiring recursive NP modification in Spanish
    • 4.1Recursion in child language
    • 4.2NP internal modifiers in Spanish
    • 4.3The complexity and recursion project
    • 4.4The Colombia study
    • 4.5The bilingual study
  • 5.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
References (75)
References
Antonsen, Karoline & Romina Farhang. 2018. The effect of PP type on recursive modification. Poster presented at the meeting of the Canadian Linguistic Association, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada, May 30-June 1.
Berko, Jean. 1958. The child’s learning of English morphology. WORD 14(2–3). 150–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brooks, Patricia J. & Michael Tomasello. 1999. How children constrain their argument structure constructions. Language 75(4). 720–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Roger & Jean Berko. 1960. Word association and the acquisition of grammar. Child Development 31(1). 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6. 339–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. ISBN: 3-11-017279-8. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1959. A Review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Language 35(1). 26–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Holland: Foris Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life inlLanguage, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Eve. 1995. The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Sarita, Teresa Ukrainetz, Jennifer Hsu, Joan Kaderavek, Laura Justice, & Ronald Gillam. 2008. Noun phrase elaboration in children’s spoken stories. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 39. 145–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & Stephen C. Levinson. 2009. The myth of language universals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32. 429–492. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Everett, Daniel L. 2005. Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã. Current Anthropology 46. 621–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2010. The evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fodor, Janet. 1998. Unambiguous triggers. Linguistic Inquiry 29. 1–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Futrell, Richard, Laura Stearns, Daniel L. Everett, Steven T. Piantadosi & Edward Gibson. 2016. A corpus investigation of syntactic embedding in Pirahã. PLOS ONE 11. e0145289. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gleitman, Lila R. 1990. The structural sources of verb meaning. Language Acquisition 1 (1). 3–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gleitman, Lila R., Kimberly Cassidy, Rebbeca Nappa, Anna Papafragou & John C. Trueswell. 2005. Hard words. Language learning and development 1(1). 23–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan. 1982. The resilience of recursion. In Eric Wanner & Lila R. Gleitman (eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art, 51–77. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guasti, Maria Teresa, Anna Gavarró, Joke de Lange & Claudia Caprin. 2008. Article omission across child languages. Language Acquisition 15(2). 89–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Han, Chung-hye, Jeffrey Lidz & Julien Musolino. 2016. Endogenous sources of variation in language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(4). 942–947. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hauser, Marc D., Noam Chomsky & W. Tecumseh Fitch. 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298. 1569–1579. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1991. Artikel und Definitheit [Articles and definiteness]. In Armin von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung, 487–535. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunsicker, Dea & Susan Goldin-Meadow. 2012. Hierarchical structure in a self-created communication system. Language 88. 732–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leguin, Ursula. 2017. No time to spare. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lidz, Jeff, Susan Waxman & Jennifer Freedman. 2003. What infants know about syntax but couldn’t have learned. Cognition 89(3). B65–B73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1991. How to set parameters: Arguments from language change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Limbach, Maxi & Dani Adone. 2010. Language acquisition of recursive possessives in English. Proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Language Development 34. 281–90.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 2018. Principles, parameters, and schemata: A radically underspecified UG. Linguistic Analysis 41 (3). 517–557.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marcus, Gary F., Sugumaran Vijayan, S. Bandi Rao & Peter M. Vishton. 1999. Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. Science 283(5398). 77–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Markman, Ellen M. & Gwin F. Wachtel. 1988. Children’s use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology 20. 121–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moreira-Rodríguez, Antonia. 2006. ‘The book on the table’, ‘The nan in the moon’: Post-modification of nouns by preposition + noun in English and Castilian. Bulletin of Spanish Studies 83(1). 53–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew, David Pesetsky & Cilene Rodrigues. 2009. Pirahã exceptionality: A reassessment. Language 85. 355–404. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ninio, Anat. 2011. Syntactic development, its input and output. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pannemann, Maren. 2007. DP acquisition as structure unravelling. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam dissertation.
Paradis, Johanne & Fred Genesee. 1996. Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18 (1). 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pearl, Lisa & Jeff Lidz. 2013. Parameters in language acquisition. In Cedruc Boeckx & Kleanthes K. Grohmann (eds.), Cambridge handbook of biolinguistics, 129–159. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pearson, Barbara Zurer, Sylvia C. Fernandez, & D. Kimbrough Oller. 1993. Lexical development in bilingual infants and toddlers. Language Learning 43 (1). 93–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, Ana T., & Anny P. Castilla-Earls. 2016. Adquisición del español como lengua materna. In Javier Gutierrez-Rexach (ed.), Enciclopedia de lingüística hispánica, 213–230. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, Ana T., Anny Castilla-Earls, Susana Béjar & Diane Massam. 2012. Elmo’s sister’s ball: The problem of acquiring nominal recursion. Language Acquisition 19. 301–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, Ana T., Tyler Peterson, Anny Castilla-Earls, Susana Béjar, Diane Massam & Yves Roberge. 2018. The acquisition of recursive modification in NPs. Language 94. 332–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, Ana T., Erin Pettibone & Anny Castilla-Earls. 2017. Down two steps: Are bilinguals delayed in the acquisition of recursively embedded PPs? Matraga (Aquisição da Linguagem) 24(41). 393–416. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, Ana T. & Yves Roberge. 2014. Development of noun phrase complexity in children. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Insight Grant Program. SSHRC: 435-2014-2000.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, Ana T., Yves Roberge, Alex Lowles, & Petra Schulz. 2021. Structural diversity does not affect the acquisition of recursive embedding: The case of possession in German. Language Acquisition.
Pérez-Leroux, Ana T., Castilla-Earls, María Fernanda Lara Díaz, & Erin Pettibone. In preparation. La adquisición de estructuras nominales complejas. University of Toronto.
Pesetsky, David. 2009. Against taking linguistic diversity at face value. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(5). 462–465. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pettibone, Erin. In preparation. The acquisition of (non)restrictive adjectives. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto dissertation.
Picallo, Carme. 2012. Structure of the noun phrase. In Jose Ignacio Hualde, Antxon Olarrea & Erin O’Rourke (eds), The handbook of Hispanic linguistics, 263–284. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pine, Julien M. & Elena V. M. Lieven. 1997. Slot and frame patterns and the development of the determiner category. Applied Psycholinguistics 18. 123–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pirvulescu, Mihaela, Yves Roberge, Danielle Thomas, Ana T. Pérez- Leroux, & Nelleke Strik. 2014. Bilingual effects: Exploring object omission in pronominal languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17(3). 495–510. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinker, Stephen. 1984. Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, Ana T. & Yves Roberge. 2018. A way into recursion. In Hollebrandse, Bart, Jaieun Kim, Ana T. Pérez-Leroux, & Petra Schulz (Eds.), UMOP 41: Thoughts on Mind and Grammar (T.O.M. and grammar): A Festschrift in Honor of Tom Roeper, 109–122. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberge, Yves, Pérez-Leroux, Ana T. & Anna Frolova. 2018. On recursive modification in L1 French. Languages 3 (6). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roeper, Tom. 2011. The acquisition of recursion: How formalism articulates the child’s path. Biolinguistics 5. 57–86Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roeper, Tom & William Snyder. 2005. Language learnability and the forms of recursion. In Anna Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), UG and external systems: Language, brain and computation, 155–169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roeper, Tom & Jill G. de Villiers. 2011. The acquisition path for wh-questions. In Jill G. de Villiers & Tom Roeper (eds.), Handbook of generative approaches to language acquisition, 189–246. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saffran, Jenny R., Richard N. Aslin & Elissa L. Newport. 1996. Statistical learning by 8-month old infants. Science 274. 1926–1928. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sauerland, Uli. 2006. On the semantic markedness of phi features. In Daniel Habour, David Adger & Susana Béjar (eds.), Phi-theory: Phi features across modules and interfaces, 57–82. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sauerland, Uli & Hans-Martin Gärtner. 2007. Interfaces + recursion = language? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Ed. Payot.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sneed German, Elisa. 2008. Input in the acquisition of genericity. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University dissertation.
Snyder, William. 2007. Child language: The parametric approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snyder, William, Ann Senghas & Kelly Ihnman. 2001. Agreement morphology and the acquisition of noun-drop in Spanish. Language Acquisition 9(2).157–173. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Syrett, Kristen & Jeff Lidz. 2009. QR in child grammar: Evidence from antecedent-contained deletion. Language Acquisition 16. 67–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thordardottir, Elin. 2014. The typical development of simultaneous bilinguals. In Johanne Paradis and Therese Grüter (eds.), Input and experience in bilingual development, 141–160. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2000. Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition 74. 209–253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Unsworth, Sharon. 2014. Comparing the role of input in bilingual acquisition across domains. In Johanne Paradis & Therese Grüter (eds.), Input and experience in bilingual development, 181–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valian, Virginia, Stephanie Solt & John Stewart. 2009. Abstract categories or limited-scope formulae: The case of children’s determiners. Journal of Child Language 36(4). 743–778. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Widmer, Manuel, Sandra Auderset, Johanna Nichols, Paul Widmer & Balthasar Bickel. 2017. NP recursion over time: Evidence from Indo-European. Language 93. 799–826. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, Charles. 2002. Knowledge and learning in natural language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Universal Grammar, statistics, or both. Trends in Cognitive Science 8(10). 449–454. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. For and against frequencies. Journal of Child Language 42(2). 287–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. The price of linguistic productivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue