Cover not available

In:English Historical Linguistics: Change in structure and meaning
Edited by Bettelou Los, Claire Cowie, Patrick Honeybone and Graeme Trousdale
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 358] 2022
► pp. 287–308

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 12
Towards a companionate marriage in Late Modern England?

Two critical episodes in Mary Hamilton’s courtship letters to John Dickenson

ORCiD logo with link | Université de Lausanne
Published online: 2 February 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.358.12gar
Abstract
Using a Critical Discourse Analysis approach (Fairclough 1992) which combines micro and macro level analysis, this article explores how the social relationship of a privileged couple, Mary Hamilton (1756–1816) and John Dickenson (c.1757–1842), is negotiated during their courtship in 1784–85 on the basis of Hamilton’s letters in the Mary Hamilton Papers (HAM/2/15), held by The University of Manchester Library. The focus lies on two moments of crisis in which Hamilton criticises Dickenson’s behaviour concerning letter-writing and hunting practices. The couple seems to follow the ideals of the companionate marriage which emerged in the eighteenth century: they treat each other as equals, which allows Hamilton to be outspoken about her opinions, and the partners accommodate to each other’s positions.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Framework
  • 3.Material
  • 4.Social practice: Courtship and marriage in the upper classes in eighteenth-century England
  • 5.Two case studies
    • 5.1Discursive practice: Letter frequency
    • 5.2‘Text’ dimension: Hunting
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Sources
  • References
References (31)
Sources
DDX 274. Dickenson family of Birch Hall. Lancashire Archives.
Mary Hamilton Papers. The University of Manchester Library (GB 133 HAM). [URL] (24 April, 2019)
Sill, Geoffrey M. (ed.). 2016. The court journals and letters of Frances Burney. Volume 5: 1789. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
References
Anson, Elizabeth & Florence Anson. 1925. Mary Hamilton, afterwards Mrs. John Dickenson, at court and at home: From letters and diaries, 1756 to 1816. London: Murray.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Anne Pimlot. 2004. Hamilton, Mary (1756–1816). Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (24 April, 2019)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barclay, Katie. 2011. Love, intimacy and power: Marriage and patriarchy in Scotland, 1650–1850. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, Alan. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13. 145–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Back in style: Reworking audience design. In Miriam Meyerhoff & Erik Schleef (eds.), The Routledge sociolinguistics reader, 32–52. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Irene Q. 1982. Domesticity, feminism, and friendship: Female aristocratic culture and marriage in England, 1660–1760. Journal of Family History 7(4). 406–424. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chiavetta, Eleonora. 2012. A critical discourse analysis approach to the letters of Frances Leonora Macleay. In Marina Dossena & Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.), Letter writing in late modern Europe, 89–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crawley, Lisa. 2014. A life recovered: Mary Hamilton 1756–1816. Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 90(2). 27–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eger, Elizabeth. 2017. Bluestocking circle [bluestockings]. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (24 April, 2019)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2000. Like talking on paper? The pragmatics of courtship and the eighteenth-century familiar letter. Language Sciences 22(3). 359–383. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, Anne-Christine. 2018. Downward social mobility in eighteenth-century English: A micro-level analysis of the correspondence of Queen Charlotte, Mary Hamilton and Frances Burney. In Anita Auer & Mikko Laitinen (eds.), special issue Mobility, variability and changing literacies in modern times, Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 119(1). 71–100.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, Anne-Christine, Marianne Hundt & Moira Kindlimann. 2017. Digitization of the Mary Hamilton Papers. ICAME Journal 41. 83–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hannan, Leonie. 2016. Women of letters: Gender, writing and the life of the mind in early modern England. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heffron, Margery M. 2010. “A fine romance”: The courtship correspondence between Louisa Catherine Johnson and John Quincy Adams. The New England Quarterly 83(2). 200–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holloway, Sally. 2019. The game of love in Georgian England: Courtship, emotions, and material culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lystra, Karen. 1989. Searching the heart: Women, men, and romantic love in nineteenth-century America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevala, Minna. 2004. Address in early English correspendence: Its forms and socio-pragmatic functions. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. 1996. Forms of address in early English correspondence. In Terttu Nevalainen & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (eds.), Sociolinguistics and language history: Studies based on the corpus of early English correspondence, 167–181. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sairio, Anni. 2013. Cordials and sharp satyrs: Stance and self-fashioning in eighteenth-century letters. In Marijke van der Wal & Gijsbert Rutten (eds.), Touching the past: Studies in the historical sociolinguistics of ego-documents, 183–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Grey goose quills and scripts of self-discipline: The linguistic biography of Elizabeth Montagu (1718–1800). Paper presented at the symposium “The eighteenth century in ego documents: The individual in society”, Zurich, March 9–10.
Stone, Lawrence. 1977. The family, sex and marriage in England 1500–1800. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2009. An introduction to Late Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whyman, Susan. 2009. The pen and the people: English letter writers 1660–1800. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Oudesluijs, Tino
2024. “No criticism or remarks & pray burn it as fast as you read it”. In Unlocking the History of English [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 364], ► pp. 180 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue