In:English Historical Linguistics: Change in structure and meaning
Edited by Bettelou Los, Claire Cowie, Patrick Honeybone and Graeme Trousdale
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 358] 2022
► pp. 263–286
Chapter 11Theatrical practices and grammatical standardization in eighteenth-century Britain
you was and you were
Published online: 2 February 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.358.11hye
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.358.11hye
Abstract
This chapter extends the discussion of second-person pronouns and of eighteenth-century language norms by examining three playwrights’ use of you was in the period before its proscription by grammarians like Robert Lowth (1762). Our analysis corroborates historical sociolinguistic surveys by Tieken-Boon van Ostade (2002) and Laitinen (2009) that identify you was as informal/familiar before 1762. We also show that you was was salient and associated with social lowness in comedies well before it was stigmatized by prescriptivists. Finally, while acknowledging the distinctness of theatrical language, we have identified one useful general property of comedy and especially romantic comedy. The stylized opposition between comic characters (particularly lovers) can signal sociolinguistic salience, here of you was/were by 1747.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Context
- 3.Methods
- 4.1752–1773: A broadly quantitative overview
- 5.Before 1762: Qualitative analysis of you was in context
- 5.1Social status and you was
- 5.2you was and you were in explicit contrast
- 5.3you were in formal contexts
- 5.4you was from condescension to emotion
- 5.5Unaffected you was used by lead female characters
- 6.Conclusion
Acknowledgements References
References (22)
Adamson, Sylvia. 2001. Understanding Shakespeare’s grammar: Studies in small words. In Sylvia Adamson, Lynette Hunter, Lynne Magnusson, Ann Thompson & Katie Wales (eds.), Reading Shakespeare’s dramatic language: A guide, 210–236. London: Arden Shakespeare.
Anderson, Misty G. 2014. Genealogies of comedy. In Julia Swindells & David Francis Taylor (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the Georgian theatre, 1737–1832 (Oxford Handbooks Online), 347–367. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bevis, Richard. 1980. The laughing tradition: Stage comedy in Garrick’s day. Athens: The University of Georgia Press.
Breen, Jennifer. 2004, September 23. Celesia [née Mallet], Dorothea (bap. 1738, d. 1790), playwright and poet. Oxford dictionary of national biography. [URL] (27 March, 2019.)
Eighteenth Century Collections Online = ECCO. 2021. Gale Cengage Learning. [URL]
Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2012. Social factors and language change in eighteenth-century England: The case of multiple negation. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 113(3). 293–321.
Garrick, David. 1980. The plays of David Garrick. 2 volumes. Harry William Pedicord & Fredrick Louis Bergmann (eds.). Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Hegele, Arden. 2008. Bad grammar in the eighteenth century: Mid-century dramatists and public opinion. [URL]
Laitinen, Mikko. 2009. Singular YOU WAS/WERE variation and English normative grammars in the eighteenth century. In Arja Nurmi, Minna Nevala & Minna Palander-Collin (eds.), The language of daily life in England (1400–1809), 199–217. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Leggatt, Alexander. 1998. English stage comedy, 1490–1990: Five centuries of a genre. London: Routledge.
Literature Online = LION. 1996–2021. Search Texts. [URL]
Lowth, Robert. 1762. A short introduction to English grammar, with critical notes. London: A. Millar, R. & J. Dodsley. ECCO.
Nonomiya, Ayumi. 2014. Thou and you in eighteenth-century English plays. Token: A journal of English linguistics 3. 211–234.
Nussbaum, Felicity. 2010. Rival queens: Actresses, performance, and the eighteenth-century British theater. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Oxford Dictionary of National Biography [ODNB]. [URL]
Priestley, Joseph. 1761. The rudiments of English grammar, adapted to the use of schools. With observations on style. London: R. Griffiths. ECCO.
Sundby, Bertil, Anne Kari Bjørge & Kari E. Haugland (eds.). 1991. The dictionary of English normative grammar, 1700–1800 [= DENG]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2002. You was and eighteenth-century normative grammar. In Katja Lenz & Ruth Mohlig (eds.), Of dyuersitie & chaunge of langage, 88–102. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter.
. 2011. The bishop’s grammar: Robert Lowth and the rise of prescriptivism in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Walker, Terry. 2007. thou and you in early modern English dialogues: Trials, depositions, and drama comedy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Nevala, Minna
Caon, Luisella, Moragh Gordon & Thijs Porck
2024. Introduction. In Unlocking the History of English [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 364], ► pp. 1 ff.
Hyett, James & Carol Percy
2024. Gender, genre, and prescriptivism. In Unlocking the History of English [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 364], ► pp. 60 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.