In:Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2018: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 32, Utrecht
Edited by Frank Drijkoningen, Sergio Baauw and Luisa Meroni
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 357] 2021
► pp. 303–316
Chapter 16Fission in Romance demonstrative-reinforcer constructions
Published online: 17 December 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.357.16ter
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.357.16ter
Abstract
This paper proposes a new approach to Romance demonstrative-reinforcer constructions. The account is based on a binary valued feature system for deictic person and is embedded in the Distributed Morphology framework. Looking at data from Romance varieties, some (implicit) shortcomings of previous accounts are repaired via a morphological operation: Fission. Specifically, those accounts do not provide formal means to make sense of the deictic compatibility constraint between the demonstrative and its reinforcer, nor do they discuss categorisation issues relative to reinforcers. Via Fission, instead, a featural reason is given to ensure deictic compatibility, and I put forward a new approach to the category of reinforcers, aiming to overcome their problematic categorisation as DP-internal adverbs.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data: Romance demonstratives and DRCs
- 3.Fission
- 4.Beyond deictic fission: [Focus]
- 5.The category of reinforcers
- 6.Concluding remarks
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (16)
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2001. Functional structure in nominals: Nominalization and ergativity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bernstein, Judy B. 1997. Demonstratives and reinforcers in Romance and Germanic languages. Lingua 102. 87–113.
Brugè, Laura. 1996. Demonstrative movement in Spanish: A comparative approach. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 6. 1–61.
. 2002. The positions of demonstratives in the extended nominal projection. In Guglielmo Cinque (ed.), Functional structure in DP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures, 15–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1993. A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry 24. 239–297.
Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives. Form, function, and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Halle, Morris. 1997. Distributed Morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In Benjamin Bruening, Yoonjung Kang & Martha McGinnis (eds.), PF: Papers at the Interface [MITWPL 30], 425–449. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lander, Eric & Liliane Haegeman. 2018. The nanosyntax of spatial deixis. Studia Linguistica 72(2). 362–427.
Ledgeway, Adam & John C. Smith. 2016. Deixis. In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 879–896. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nevins, Andrew. 2007. The representation of third person and its consequences for person-case effects. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25. 273–313.
Noyer, R. Rolf. 1992. Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. Ph.D. Dissertation: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Roehrs, Dorian. 2010. Demonstrative-reinforcer constructions. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 13. 225–268.
Terenghi, Silvia. 2019. Demonstrative-reinforcer constructions and the syntactic role of deictic features. Linguistics in the Netherlands 36. 192–207.
Terenghi, Silvia & Jan Casalicchio. 2019. Demonstrative-reinforcer constructions: Variation in Italo-Romance. Paper presented at 14th Cambridge Italian Dialect Syntax-Morphology Meeting (CIDSM 14), Prague, May 27–29.