In:Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2018: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 32, Utrecht
Edited by Frank Drijkoningen, Sergio Baauw and Luisa Meroni
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 357] 2021
► pp. 171–190
Chapter 9Brazilian and European Portuguese and Holmberg’s 2005 typology of null subject languages
Published online: 17 December 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.357.09mar
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.357.09mar
Abstract
This paper rethinks Holmberg’s (2005) characterization of partial vs. consistent null subject languages (NSL) based on data from Brazilian and European Portuguese, the former a partial, the latter a consistent NSL. The paper proposes that rather than overt morphological distinctions, what is relevant for null subject licensing is the underlying feature specification of the verbal inflection, after agreement between T and a pronominal subject values the relevant person/number/gender/Case feature. Hence, only close inspection of the pronominal and agreement systems of individual NSLs permits an adequate characterization of them, for the same language may behave as a ‘partial’, ‘consistent’, or ‘radical’ NSL depending on the morphological feature specification of its nominative pronouns and T heads.
Article outline
- 1.Consistent, partial, and radical pro-drop languages: Questions and aim of the paper
- 2.A fine-grained investigation on verbal agreement and null subject licensing in BP and EP
- 3.Null subjects without ‘rich agreement’: Participial clauses
- 4.Null subjects without ϕ-agreement: Gerund clauses
- 5.Concluding remarks
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (37)
Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou. 1998. Parametrizing AGR: Word order, V-movement and EPP-checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16. 491–539.
Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan. 2009. Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bonet, Eulàlia. 1991. Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance. Ph.D. Dissertation: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Carvalho, Janayna. 2019. Teasing apart 3rd person null subjects in Brazilian Portuguese. In Ingo Feldhausen, Martin Elsig, Imme Kuchenbrandt & Mareike Neuhaus (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2016. Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 30 Frankfurt, 237–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
. 2008. On Phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero, and María Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Costa, João & Sandra Pereira. 2005. Phases and autonomous features: A case of mixed agreement in European Portuguese. In Martha McGinnis & Norvin Richards (eds.), Perspectives on Phases, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 49. 115–124.
Duarte, Maria Eugênia. 1993. Do pronome nulo ao pronome pleno: a trajetória do sujeito no português do Brasil. In Ian Roberts & Mary A. Kato (eds.), Português Brasileiro: uma viagem diacrônica, 107–128. Campinas: Editora da UNICAMP.
. 2000. The loss of the Avoid Pronoun principle in Brazilian Portuguese. In Mary A. Kato & Esmeralda Negrão (eds.), Brazilian Portuguese and the Null Subject parameter, 17–36. Frankfurt: Vervuert-Iberoamericana.
Duguine, Maia. 2013. Null arguments and linguistic variation: A minimalist analysis of pro-drop. Ph.D. Dissertation: University of the Basque Country/University of Nantes.
Ferreira, Marcelo. 2000. Argumentos Nulos em Português Brasileiro. M.A. Thesis: Universidade Estadual de Campinas.
. 2009. Null subjects and finite control in Brazilian Portuguese. In Jairo Nunes (ed.), Minimalist essays on Brazilian Portuguese Syntax, 17–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Galves, Charlotte. 1993. O enfraquecimento da concordância no português brasileiro. In Ian Roberts & Mary A. Kato (eds.), Português Brasileiro: uma viagem diacrônica, 387–408. Campinas: Editora da UNICAMP.
Holmberg, Anders. 2005. Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 533–64.
. 2009a. Null subject parameters. In Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.) Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory, 88–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 2009b. The null generic subject pronoun in Finnish: A case of incorporation. In Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory, 200–230. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 2016. Null subjects in Finnish and the typology of pro-drop. To appear in Anne Tamm & Anne Vainikka (eds.), Uralic syntax. [URL]
Holmberg, Anders, Aarti Nayudu & Michelle Sheehan. 2009. Three partial null-subject languages: A comparison of Brazilian Portuguese, Finnish, and Marathi. Studia Linguistica 63. 59–97.
Kato, Mary A. 1999. Strong pronouns, weak pronominals and the null subject parameter. Probus 11. 1–37.
Lobo, Maria & Ana Maria Martins. 2017. Subjects. In Andreas Dufter & Elisabeth Stark (eds.), Manual of Romance morphosyntax and syntax, 27–88. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Menuzzi, Sérgio. 2000. First person plural anaphora in Brazilian Portuguese: Chains and constraint interaction in binding. In João Costa (ed.), Portuguese syntax: New comparative studies, 191–240. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nunes, Jairo. 2008. Inherent Case as a licensing condition for A-movement: The case of hyper-raising constructions in Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 7. 83–108.
. 2019. Remarks on finite control and hyper-raising in Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 18(1). 4.
Perlmutter, David. 1971. Deep and surface constraints in syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Pires, Acrísio. 2006. The minimalist syntax of defective domains. Gerunds and infinitives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Roberts, Ian. 2010. A deletion analysis of null subjects. In Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory, 58–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenkvist, Henrik. 2018. Null subjects and distinct Agreement in Modern Germanic. In Federica Cognola & Jan Casalicchio (eds.), Null subjects in Generative grammar, 285–306. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Saab, Andrés. 2008. Hacia una teoría de la identidad parcial en la elipsis. Ph.D. Dissertation: University of Buenos Aires.
. 2016. On the notion of partial (non-) pro-drop in Romance. In Mary A. Kato & Francisco Ordoñez (eds.), The morphosyntax of Spanish and Portuguese in Latin America, 49–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sheehan, Michelle. 2006. The EPP and null subjects in Romance. Ph.D. Dissertation: Newcastle University.
. 2016. Subjects, null subjects and expletives. In Susann Fischer & Christoph Gabriel (eds.), Manual of grammatical interfaces in Romance, 329–362. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Simioni, Leonor. 2011. Concordância em construções passivas com argumentos pré- e pós- verbais e incorporação de nomes nus no Português Brasileiro. Ph.D. Dissertation: Universidade de São Paulo.
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2014. The Merge condition: A syntactic approach to selection. In Peter Kosta, Steven Franks, Teodora Radeva-Bork & Lilia Schürcks (eds.), Minimalism and beyond: Radicalizing the interfaces, 130–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Martins, Ana Maria & Jairo Nunes
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
