In:Language and Text: Data, models, information and applications
Edited by Adam Pawłowski, Jan Mačutek, Sheila Embleton and George Mikros
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 356] 2021
► pp. 93–108
Linking the dependents
Quantitative-linguistic hypotheses on valency
Published online: 22 December 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.356.06ste
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.356.06ste
Abstract
This chapter relates the syntactic and semantic aspects of case and valency to morphological properties and builds a model of these. Two linguistic hypotheses are derived and tested on corpus data and data of a lexicon which are built on the principles of Frame Semantics. My hypotheses are confirmed: (A) the larger the number of variables of a semantic predicate, the larger is the number of the syntactic dependents of the realized syntactic constructs, and (B) the larger the number of semantic roles, the larger is the tendency for shortening on the syntactic level.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The functional equivalents of coding semantic case
- 3.Quantitative definitions of valency
- 4.Derivation of linguistic hypotheses of valency
- 5.FrameNet data
- 6.Statistical hypotheses and testing
- 7.Interpretations and conclusions
References
References (31)
Altmann, Gabriel. 1978. Towards a theory of language. In Gabriel Altmann (ed.), Glottometrika 1 (Quantitative Linguistics 1), 1–25. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
Baker, Collin F., Charles J. Fillmore & Beau Cronin. 2003. The structure of the FrameNet database. International Journal of Lexicography 16(3). 281–296.
Emons, Rudolf. 1978. Valenzgrammatik für das Englische: Eine Einführung (Anglistische Arbeitshefte 16). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Erdmann, Peter. 1988. On the principle of ‘weight’ in English. In Caroline Duncan-Rose (ed.), On language: Rhetorica, phonologica, syntactica; a festschrift for Robert P. Stockwell from his friends and colleagues, 325–339. London: Routledge.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The case for case. In Emmon W. Bach & Robert T. Harms (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory (A Holt international edition), 1–88. London: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
1982. Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the morning calm, 111–137. Seoul, Korea: Hanshin Publishing Company.
2007. Valency issues in FrameNet. In Thomas Herbst & Katrin Götz-Votteler (eds.), Valency: Theoretical, descriptive and cognitive issues (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 187), 129–160. Berlin: de Gruyter. Reprint 2008. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fillmore, Charles J., Christopher R. Johnson & Miriam N. L. Petruck. 2003. Background to FrameNet. International Journal of Lexicography 16(3). 235–249.
Herbst, Thomas. 2003. Was soll zum Beispiel eine obligatorische Ergänzung sein? Oder ein zweivalentes Verb? – Zur Interdependenz valenzpolitischer Festlegungen. In Alan Cornell, Klaus Fischer & Ian F. Roe (eds.), Valency in practice – Valenz in der Praxis, 65–88. Frankfurt: Lang.
Herbst, Thomas & Susen Schüller. 2008. Introduction to syntactic analysis: A valency approach (Narr-Studienbücher). Tübingen: Narr.
Jakobson, Roman. 1936. Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre: Gesamtbedeutungen der russischen Kasus. In Praský linguistický krouek (ed.), Études dédiées au quatrième congrès de linguistes (Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague 6), 240–288. Prague: Jednota eskoslovenských matematiku a fysik. Reprint 1971. In Roman Jakobson (ed.), Word and language (Selected Writings II), 23–71. The Hague: Mouton. Reprint 2010. Tübingen: de Gruyter Mouton.
. 1984. Contribution to the general theory of case: General meanings of the Russian cases. In Roman Jakobson (ed.), Russian and Slavic grammar: Studies 1931–1981 (Janua Linguarum. Series Maior 106), 59–103. Berlin: de Gruyter. . [Translation of Jakobson 1936].
Jiang, Jingyang & Haitao Liu. 2018. Quantitative analysis of dependency structures (Quantitative Linguistics 71). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Köhler, Reinhard. 1986. Zur linguistischen Synergetik: Struktur und Dynamik der Lexik (Quantitative Linguistics 31). Bochum: Studienverlag Brockmeyer.
. 2005. Synergetic linguistics. In Reinhard Köhler, Gabriel Altmann & Rajmund Genrikhovich Piotrowski (eds.), Quantitative Linguistik – Quantitative Linguistics: Ein internationales Handbuch – An International Handbook (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft – Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 27), 760–774. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levin, Beth & Malka Hovav Rappaport. 2005. Argument realization (Research Surveys in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lichte, Timm. 2015. Syntax und Valenz: Zur Modellierung kohärenter und elliptischer Strukturen mit Baumadjunktionsgrammatiken (Empirically Oriented Theoretical Morphology and Syntax 1). Berlin: Language Science Press.
Ruppenhofer, Josef, Michael Ellsworth, Myriam R. L. Petruck, Christopher R. Johnson, Collin Baker & Jan Scheffczyk. 2016. Framenet II: extended theory and practice. Berkeley, CA: International Computer Science Institute. [URL]
Somers, Harold L. 1984. On the validity of the complement-adjunct distinction in valency grammar. Linguistics 22(4). 507–530.
1987. Valency and case in computational linguistics (Edinburgh information technology series 3). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Steiner, Petra. 2013. Diversification of English valency patterns. In Reinhard Köhler & Gabriel Altmann (eds.), Issues in quantitative linguistics 3 (Studies in Quantitative Linguistics 5), 369–391. Lüdenscheid: RAM-Verlag.
Storrer, Angelika. 1992. Verbvalenz: Theoretische und methodische Grundlagen ihrer Beschreibung in Grammatikographie und Lexikographie (Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 126). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
. 2015. Elements of structural syntax. Translated by Sylvain Kahane & Timothy John Osborne. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. . [Translation of Tesnière 1965].
