In:Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2017: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 31, Bucharest
Edited by Alexandru Nicolae and Adina Dragomirescu
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 355] 2021
► pp. 277–296
On another apparent violation of the subject-island constraint in French
Published online: 1 December 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.355.14men
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.355.14men
Abstract
This chapter addresses extractions of wh-marked complements of nouns out of French subject DPs into direct interrogatives – an apparent violation of the subject island constraint. We explain why some speakers of French can extract such constituents into interrogatives with complex inversion, whereas the grammaticality of other interrogative structures is clearly degraded. Our formal analysis is based on the Minimalist Program and assumes that material extracted from DPs has to pass through the DP phase-edge. In complex inversion, a structure in which the subject itself needs to move to the CP, the reordered subject DP (with the complement of N at the DP phase-edge) moves as a whole, thus giving a surface order that violates the subject island constraint only in appearance.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Aims and structure of this chapter
- 1.2Types of direct wh-interrogatives in French
- 2.The data
- 3.Theoretical background on extraction from DP and complex inversion in French
- 3.1Extraction from DPs in French
- 3.2Complex inversion in French
- 4.Analysis
- 5.Conclusions and outlook
Acknowledgements Notes References Appendix
References (47)
Bonami, Olivier & Danièle Godard. 2001. Inversion du sujet: Constituance et ordre des mots. In Jean-Marie Marandin (ed.), Cahier Jean-Claude Milner, 117–174. Lagrasse: Verdier.
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael J. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
. 2008. On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos Peregrín Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam, Ángel J. Gallego & Dennis Ott. 2019. Generative grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions, and challenges. In Ángel J. Gallego & Dennis Ott (eds.), Generative syntax: Questions, crossroads, and challenges (special issue of Catalan Journal of Linguistics
), 229–261. Barcelona: Universitàt de Barcelona, Servei de Publicacions. (8 July, 2020).
. 2014. Extraction from DP in Italian revisited. In Enoch Oladé Aboh, Maria Teresa Guasti & Ian Roberts (eds.), Locality, 86–103. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dehé, Nicole & Yordanka Kavalova. 2007. Parentheticals: An introduction. In Nicole Dehé & Yordanka Kavalova (eds.), Parentheticals, 1–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Godard, Danièle. 1992. Extraction out of NP in French. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 10. 233–277.
Grosu, Alexander. 1974. On the nature of the left branch condition. Linguistic Inquiry 5(2). 308–319.
Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo. 2001. Phases, case and accessibility: The case of extraction from DP in Spanish. In James McCloskey (ed.), Syntax and semantics at Santa Cruz 3, 104–118. Santa Cruz, CA: Linguistics Research Center, University of California.
Haegeman, Liliane. 1988. Parenthetical adverbials: The Radical orphanage approach. In Shuki Chiba, Akira Ogawa, Yasuaki Fuiwara, Norio Yamada, Osama Koma & Takao Yagi (eds.), Aspects of modern linguistics: Papers presented to Masatomo Ukaji on his 60th birthday, 232–254. Tokyo: Kaitakushi.
Kayne, Richard S. 1983. Chains, categories external to S, and French complex inversion. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 1. 107–139.
Kayne, Richard S. & Jean-Yves Pollock. 1978. Stylistic inversion, successive cyclicity, and move NP in French. Linguistic Inquiry 9(4). 595–621.
Kellert, Olga. 2017. Interrogatives. In Andreas Dufter & Elisabeth Stark (eds.), Manual of Romance morphosyntax and syntax, 569–603. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Kolliakou, Dimitra. 1999.
De-phrase extractability and individual/property denotation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 17. 713–781.
Lalande, Jean Yves. 1997. Verbstellung im Deutschen und Französischen: Unter Anwendung eines CAD-basierten Expertensystems. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Mensching, Guido. 2019. Extraction from DP in French: A minimalist approach. In Ludovico Franco, Mihaela Moreno & Matthew Reeve (eds.), Agreement, case and locality in the nominal and verbal domains, 249–277. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Mensching, Guido & Anja Weingart. 2016. The null subject parameter and the lexicon in minimalist syntax. In Luis Javier Eguren Gutiérrez, Olga Fernández-Soriano & Amaya Mendikoetxea (eds.), Rethinking parameters, 291–328. New York: Oxford University Press.
Müller, Gereon. 2011. Constraints on displacement: A phase-based approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Munaro, Nicola & Jean-Yves Pollock. 2005. Quʼest-ce-que (qu)-est-ce-que?: A case study in comparative Romance interrogative syntax. In Guglielmo Cinque & Richard S. Kayne (eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, 542–606. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Obenauer, Hans-Georg. 1984. On the identification of empty categories. The Linguistic Review 4. 153–202.
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20(3). 365–424.
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 2006. Subject clitics and complex inversion. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, Volume 4, 601–659. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Radford, Andrew. 2004. Minimalist syntax: Exploring the structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rappaport, Gilbert C. 2006. The Syntax of possessors in the nominal phrase: Drawing the lines and deriving the forms. In Ji-yung Kim, Yuri A. Lander & Barbara H. Partee (eds.), Possessives and beyond: Semantics and syntax, 243–261. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Richards, Norvin. 2001. Movement in language: Interactions and architectures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roberts, Ian. 2010. Varieties of French and the null subject parameter. In Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory, 303–327. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rooryck, Johan. 1994. On two types of underspecification: Towards a feature theory shared by syntax and phonology. Probus 6(2–3). 207–233.
Safir, Ken. 1986. Relative clauses in a theory of binding and levels. Linguistic Inquiry 17(4). 663–689.
Spyropoulos, Vasillios & Nikolaos Stamatogiannis. 2011. Subextraction from subjects in Greek: Things that you can thing and you can say. Paper presented at the workshop Islands in Contemporary Linguistic Theory, University of the Basque Country, Vitoria-Gasteiz, 16–18 November 2011. [URL]. (26 June, 2018).
Svenonius, Peter. 2004. On the edge. In David Adger, Cécile de Cat & George Tsoulas (eds.), Peripheries: Syntactic edges and their effects, 261–287. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Szabolcsi, Anna. 2006. Strong and weak islands. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, Volume 4, 479–532. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Szabolcsi, Anna & Marcel den Dikken. 2003. Islands. In Lisa Lai Shen Cheng & Rint Sybesma (eds.), The second Glot international state-of-the-article book: The latest in linguistics, 213–240. Berlin: de Gruyter.
