Cover not available

In:Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2017: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 31, Bucharest
Edited by Alexandru Nicolae and Adina Dragomirescu
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 355] 2021
► pp. 239–262

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

The causative-inchoative alternation (as we know it) might fall short

Crosslanguage systematicities and untapped data from Romance and Greek

 | National Research Council-Argentina (CONICET)
Published online: 1 December 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.355.12man
Abstract
This contribution challenges the claim that internal arguments are stable/constant arguments in the causative-inchoative alternation. It presents evidence that a third (external-argument-only) variant, produced by the standard combinatorial system, is possible (and systematic) in Romance and Greek. Free composition with a null causative v 0 independent of the internal-argument-licensing head: explains all the hallmarks of monadic (intransitive) variants; correctly preserves event/argument structure correlation (no internal-argument-introducing head, no change-of-state event); uncovers crosslanguage contrasts concerning ±availability of cause(r) interpretation of sole arguments in equipollent derivations. My argument is supported by a parallel with non-Romance languages with comparable morphology (Greek). Such symmetries show a transparent morpho-semantic-syntactic correlation in the choice of argument frame, extending to other verb classes with transitivity alternation. Greek and Romance data support a (a) wider causative alternation with expected semantic/syntactic/morphological implications; (b) (missing) structural distinction among (in)transitivity alternations. Arguably, languages may differ in the availability of this option, showing at least two patterns of variation.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A basic monadic eventless configuration
    • 2.1Why not a null object?
    • 2.2Eventless monoargumental (and eventless cause)
    • 2.3Section summary
  • 3.Additional evidence
    • 3.1Psych verbs
    • 3.2Greek
    • 3.3Section summary
  • 4.Final remarks
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (46)
References
Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou. 2003. Voice morphology in the causative–inchoative alternation. In Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle, 115–136. Oxford: Oxord University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer. 2006. The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically. In Mara Frascarelli (ed.), Phases of interpretation, 187–211. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Gianina Iordăchioaia. 2014. The psych causative alternation. Lingua 148. 53–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arad, Maya. 1998. VP-Structure and the syntax-lexicon interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh & Roumyana Pancheva. 2006. Implicit arguments. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, Volume 2, 558–588. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cattaneo, Andrea. 2008. Italian null objects and resultative/depictive predication. In Emily Elfner & Martin Wakov (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 37, 141–152. Amherst: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 2004. A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. In Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle, 22–59. Oxford: Oxord University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doron, Edit. 2003. Agency and voice: The semantics of the Semitic templates. Natural Language Semantics 11. 1–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Folli, Raffaella & Heidi Harley. 2005. Flavors of v. In Roumyana Slabakova & Paula Kempchinsky (eds.), Aspectual inquiries, 95–120. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Causation, obligation and argument structure. Linguistic Inquiry 38. 207–249. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Folli, Raffaella, Heidi Harley & Simin Karimi. 2005. Determinants of event type in Persian complex predicates. Lingua 115. 1365–1401. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hale, Ken & Samuel J. Keyser. 1988. Explaining and constraining the English middle. In Carol Tenny (ed.), Studies in Generative Approaches to Aspect, 41–58. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. On the argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Ken Hale & Samuel Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20, 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth; Samuel Jay Keyser. 1998. The Basic Elements of Argument Structure. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 32, 73–118.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hale, Ken & Samuel J. Keyser. 2002. Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2012. Lexical decomposition in modern syntactic theory. In Wolfram Hinzen, Edouard Machery & Markus Werning (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compositionality, 328–350. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. On the identity of roots. Theoretical Linguistics 40. 225–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. The “bundling” hypothesis and the disparate functions of little v. In Roberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Ángel J. Gallego (eds.), The verbal domain, 3–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and transitivity, 87–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. Parts and boundaries. Cognition 41. 9–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. Verb classes in English. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport-Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Classifying single argument verbs. In Peter Coopmans, Martin Everaert & Jane Grimshaw (eds.), Lexical specification and insertion, 269–304. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. An event structure account of English resultatives. Language 77. 766–797. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Lexicalized scales and verbs of scalar change. Paper presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of the CLS, Chicago, IL, April 8–10.
. 2012. Lexicon uniformity and the causative alternation. Martin Everaert, Marijana Marelj & Tal Siloni (eds.), The theta system, 1–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. Manuscript. English object alternations: A unified account. Stanford University. 2006.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maienborn, Claudia. 2007. On Davidsonian and Kimian states. In Ileana Comorovski & Klaus von Heusinger (eds.), Existence: Syntax and semantics, 107–130. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mangialavori Rasia, Maria Eugenia. 2019. Stativity in the causative alternation? New questions and a new variant. Open Linguistics 5. 233–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mangialavori & Marin. 2021. Psych verb transitivity: the English/Romance crosscut. Talk at Sensus 2. Constructing meaning in Romance. October, 1, 2021, UMass, Amherst.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marín, Rafael & Louise McNally. 2011. Inchoativity, change of state, and telicity: Evidence from Spanish reflexive psychological verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29. 467–502. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Massam, Diane. 1989. Null objects and non-thematic subjects in middles and tough constructions. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 10. 95–118.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. Null objects and non-thematic Subjects. Journal of Linguistics 28. 115–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McIntyre, Andrew. 2004. Event paths, conflation, argument structure and VP shells. Linguistics 42. 523–571. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piñón, Cristopher. 2001. A finer look at the causative-inchoative alternation. In Rachel Hastings, Brendan Jackson & Zsofia Zvolenszky (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory XI, 346–364. Ithaka: CLC Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian. 2008. Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first-phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 2002. The theta system: An overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28. 229–290.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 2003. Comparative syntax and language acquisition. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 1987. The representation of implicit and dethematized subjects. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosen, Susan. 1996. Events and verb classification. Linguistics 34. 191–223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothmayr, Antonia. 2009. The structure of stative verbs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothstein, Susan. 2012. Another look at accomplishments and incrementality. In Violeta Demonte & Louise McNally (eds.), Telicity, change and state, 60–102. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russi, Cinzia. 2008. Italian clitics. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa & Eunjeong Oh. 2007. On the syntactic composition of manner and motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue