In:All Things Morphology: Its independence and its interfaces
Edited by Sedigheh Moradi, Marcia Haag, Janie Rees-Miller and Andrija Petrovic
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 353] 2021
► pp. 349–376
Chapter 19Realization Optimality Theory
A constraint-based theory of morphology
Published online: 25 August 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.353.19xu
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.353.19xu
Abstract
This chapter discusses the framework of
Realization Optimality Theory, a constraint-based theory of
morphology. I provide an overview of its theoretical assumptions and
components such as realization constraints, markedness constraints,
morphotactic constraints, inputs, outputs, and the function
Gen. Previous accounts of several morphological
phenomena based on Realization Optimality Theory are introduced. I
also present some new thoughts on this framework with regard to
affix ordering, stem formation and stem selection in inflectional
morphology as well as Realization Optimality Theory approaches to
derivational morphology, compounding, and clitics.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Several morphological phenomena
- 2.1Blocking and extended exponence
- 2.2Affix ordering
- 2.3Syncretism
- 3.Stem formation and stem selection in inflectional
morphology
- 3.1Stem formation
- 3.2Stem selection
- 4.The interaction of morphology and phonology
- 5.Realization Optimality Theory approaches to derivational
morphology, compounding, and clitics
- 5.1Competition in derivational morphology
- 5.2Competition in compounding
- 5.3The positioning of special clitics
- 6.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes This chapter uses the abbreviations References
References (41)
Aronoff, Mark & Zheng Xu. 2010. A
Realization Optimality-Theoretic approach to affix
order. Morphology 20(2). 381–411.
Bickel, Balthasar, Goma Banjade, Martin Gaenzle, Elena Lieven, Netra Prasad Paudya, Ichchha Purna Rai, Rai Manoj, Novel Kishore Rai & Sabine Stoll. 2007. Free
prefix ordering in
Chintang. Language 83. 43–73.
Bonet, Eulàlia & Daniel Harbour. 2012. Contextual
allomorphy. In Jochen Trommer (ed.), The
morphology and phonology of
exponence, 195–235. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Caballero, Gabriella. 2010. Scope,
phonology and morphology in an agglutinating language:
Choguita Rarámuri (Tarahumara) variable suffix
ordering. Morphology 20. 165–204.
Carstairs, Andrew. 1988. Some
implications of phonologically conditioned
suppletion. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook
of
morphology 1988, 67–94. Dordrecht: Foris.
. 1990. Phonologically
conditioned
suppletion. In Wolfgang. U. Dressler, Hans C. Luschützky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer & John R. Rennison (eds.), Contemporary
morphology, 17–23. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Crysmann, Berthold & Olivier Bonami. 2016. Variable
morphotactics in information-based
morphology. Journal of
Linguistics 52. 311–374.
Embick, David & Morris Halle. 2005. On
the status of stems in morphological
theory. In Twan Geerts, Ivo van Ginnekan & Haike Jacobs (eds.), Romance
languages and linguistic theory
2003, 37–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Haiman, John. 1980. Hua:
A Papuan language of the Eastern Highlands of New
Guinea. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Inkelas, Sharon. 2011. The
interaction between morphology and
phonology. In John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan C. L. Yu (eds.), The
handbook of phonological
theory, 68–102. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kasak, Ryan. 2019. Affix
ordering and templatic morphology in
Mandan. New Haven, CT: Yale University dissertation.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1968. Linguistic
universals and linguistic
change. In Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms (eds.), Universals
in linguistic
theory, 170–210. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Lapointe, Steven G. 2001. Stem
selection and
OT. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook
of morphology
1999, 263–297. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Nordlinger, Rachel. 2010. Verbal
morphology in Murrinh-Patha: Evidence for
templates. Morphology 20. 321–341.
. 2015. Inflection
in
Murrinh-Patha. In Matthew Baerman (ed.), The
Oxford handbook of
inflection, 491–519. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Noyer, Rolf. 1997. Features,
positions, and affixes in autonomous morphological
structure. New York: Garland.
Paster, Mary. 2005. Pulaar
verbal extensions and phonologically driven affix
order. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook
of
morphology 2005, 155–199. Dordrecht: Springer.
Richardson, Matthew. 1997. Czech
clitics: 2P or not 2P, that is the
question. In Lizanne Kaiser (ed.), Yale
a-morphous linguistics
essays, 131–150. New Haven: Department of Linguistics, Yale University.
Spencer, Andrew & Ana R. Luís. 2012. Clitics:
An
introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stump, Gregory T. 2001. Inflectional
morphology: A theory of paradigm
structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vago, Robert M. 1980. The
sound pattern of
Hungarian. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Xu, Zheng. 2007. Inflectional
morphology in Optimality
Theory. Stony Brook, NY: Stony Brook University dissertation.
. 2016. The
role of morphology in Optimality
Theory. In Andrew Hippisley & Gregory T. Stump (eds.), The
Cambridge handbook of
morphology, 550–587. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 2019. Chinese
adjective-noun
combinations. In Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds.), Competition
in inflection and
word-formation (Studies in
Morphology
5), 307–334. Cham: Springer.
