Cover not available

In:All Things Morphology: Its independence and its interfaces
Edited by Sedigheh Moradi, Marcia Haag, Janie Rees-Miller and Andrija Petrovic
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 353] 2021
► pp. 327–348

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 18
A short history of phonology in America

Plus c’est la même chose, plus ça change

ORCiD logo with link | Yale University
Published online: 25 August 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.353.18and
Abstract
Although awareness of a difference between the study of the sound patterns of particular languages and the study of the language-independent capacity of humans to produce and perceive sound existed in European and American thought in the early years of the twentieth century, a clear enunciation of the distinction between phonology and phonetics is due to Otto Jespersen in 1924. As phonology became established as a coherent object of inquiry, two themes can be identified in theorizing about it: first, the question of whether phonological structure is in the mind, as an aspect of human cognition, or only a set of facts about the external data of language; and second, the question of whether there are valid universals of phonological structure. These issues are traced across the past century in the work of American linguists. An additional factor identifiable in historical shifts in theoretical perspective is somewhat less principled: as discussion of fundamental issues becomes more technical and relevant data harder to identify, students and scholars looking for productive research topics tend to abandon previous frameworks for others in a search for lower hanging fruit without necessarily having resolved the earlier questions.
Article outline
  • 1.The early history
  • 2.The rise of generative phonology
    • 2.1Phonological structure as an aspect of the mind
    • 2.2The place of universals
  • 3.Phonological theory after Chomsky & Halle (1968)
    • 3.1The logicism of SPE and reaction to it
    • 3.2A focus on representations
    • 3.3The rise of optimality theory
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (62)
References
Anderson, Stephen R. 1980. Notes on the development of phonological theory. Language and Speech 23. 115–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1985. Phonology in the twentieth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000. Reflections on ‘On the phonetic rules of Russian’. Folia Linguistica 34. 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. Why linguistics needs the cognitive scientist. Psychiatry 64(1). 11–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baudouin de Courtenay, Jan. 1895 [1972]. An attempt at a theory of phonetic alternations. In Edward Stankiewicz (ed.), A Baudouin de Courtenay anthology, 144–212. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 2004. Evolutionary phonology: The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloch, Bernard. 1941. Phonemic overlapping. American Speech 16. 278–284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. & Louis Goldstein. 1989. Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology 6. 201–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi. 1995. The Rise of Optimality Theory. GLOT International 1(6). 3–7.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1959. Review of B. F. Skinner, Verbal behavior. Language 35. 547–578.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1964. Current issues in linguistic theory. The Hague: Mouton & Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle. 1965. Some controversial questions in phonological theory. Journal of Linguistics 1. 97–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, Morris Halle & Fred Lukoff. 1956. On accent and juncture in English. In Morris Halle, Horace Lunt & Hugh MacLean (eds.), For Roman Jakobson, 65–80. The Hague: Mouton & Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clements, George N. 1985. The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook 2. 223–252. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dobrovolsky, Michael. 1994. Review article: Measuring the Interface. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 39. 113–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John. 1979. Autosegmental phonology. New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John & Bernard Laks. 2019. Battle in the mind fields. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1957. On the phonetic rules of Russian. Unpublished paper read to the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Chicago.
. 1959. The sound pattern of Russian. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1962. Phonology in generative grammar. Word 18. 54–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig. 1951. Methods in structural linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1980. A metrical theory of stress rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation. [Circulated by the Indiana University Linguistics club; later published by Garland Press.].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan. 1976. An introduction to natural generative phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Householder, Fred W. 1965. On some recent claims in phonological theory. Journal of Linguistics 1. 13–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1924. The philosophy of grammar. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahn, Daniel. 1976. Syllable based generalizations in English phonology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1973. Phonological representations. In Osamu Fujimura (ed.), Three dimensions of linguistic theory, 1–136. Tokyo: TEC Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kisseberth, Charles. 1970. On the functional unity of phonological rules. Linguistic Inquiry 1. 291–306.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kleene, Stephen C. 1952. Introduction to meta-mathematics. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark Y. 1975. The intonational system of English. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation. Published 1979 by Garland Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark Y. & Alan S. Prince. 1977. On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8. 249–336.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 1988. Feature geometry and dependency: A review. Phonetica 45. 84–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. Hidden generalizations: Phonological opacity in optimality theory. London: Equinox Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mielke, Jeff. 2008. The emergence of distinctive features. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Oostendorp, Marc. to appear. History of phonology: Optimality Theory. In Elan Dresher & Harry van der Hulst (eds.), Oxford handbook of the history of phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Paradis, Carole & Darlene LaCharité. 1993. Introduction: The emergence of constraints in generative phonology and a comparison of three constraint-based models. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 38. 127–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L. 1947a. Grammatical prerequisites to phonemic analysis. Word 3. 155–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1947b. Phonemics: A technique for reducing languages to writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven & Alan Prince. 1988. On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition 28. 73–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Planck, Max. 1949. Scientific autobiography, and other papers. New York: Philosophical Library. Translated from German by Frank Gaynor.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Postal, Paul. 1964. Boas and the development of phonology: Some comments based on Iroquoian. International Journal of American Linguistics 30. 269–280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, Alan. 1983. Relating to the grid. Linguistic Inquiry 14. 19–100.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky. 1993. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Manuscript, Rutgers University and University of Colorado; published as Prince & Smolensky (2004).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rumelhart, David E. & James L. McClelland. 1986. On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In Rumelhart et al. (1986), 216–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rumelhart, David E., James L. McClelland & The PDP Research Group (eds.). 1986. Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sagey, Elizabeth. 1990. The representation of features in nonlinear phonology: The articulator node. New York: Garland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1925. Sound patterns in language. Language 1. 37–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1916. Cours de linguistiique générale. Lausanne: Librairie Payot. Edited by Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye, with the collaboration of Albert Riedlinger.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1972. Chomsky’s revolution in linguistics. New York Review of Books 18(12). 16–24.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth. 1984. Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. 1957. Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stampe, David. 1973. A dissertation on natural phonology. Chicago: University of Chicago dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watson, John B. 1924. Behaviorism. New York: The People’s Institute Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weiss, Albert Paul. 1925. Linguistics and psychology. Language 1. 52–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred North & Bertrand Russell. 1910–1913. Principia mathematica, Volumes 1–3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Alkiyumi, Mohammed
2023. The creative linguistic achievements of Alkhalil bin Ahmed Al-Farahidi, and motives behind his creations: A case study. Cogent Arts & Humanities 10:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue