In:All Things Morphology: Its independence and its interfaces
Edited by Sedigheh Moradi, Marcia Haag, Janie Rees-Miller and Andrija Petrovic
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 353] 2021
► pp. 255–278
Chapter 14Conditional exponence
Published online: 25 August 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.353.14stu
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.353.14stu
Abstract
In inferential-realizational theories of
morphology, the content realized by the application of a rule of
exponence is customarily assumed to be invariant across the range of
contexts in which that rule applies. Yet, there are morphomic
exponents whose content is sensitive to context; Breton verb
inflection presents striking examples of exponents of this sort. I
argue that the patterns of context dependency presented by such
exponents are an effect of the phenomenon of rule combination, by
which simple rules of morphology may combine to form more complex
rules. Some rule combinations involve ordinary rule composition; the
properties of a combination of this sort are deducible from those of
its component rules. Other rule combinations are supplementational;
a combination of this sort possesses one or more properties that are
not deducible from those of its component rules. As I show, the
Breton examples of conditional exponence involve supplementational
rule combination. I elucidate this claim formally and discuss its
wider implications for morphological theory.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: Exponence can be conditional
- 2.Conditional exponence in Breton verb inflection
- 3.What is rule combination?
- Asymmetrical rule oppositions
- Dependent rules
- Processing frequent affix sequences
- 4.Conditional exponence as a kind of rule combination
- 5.A formal analysis of conditional exponence Breton verb inflection
- 6.Conclusions
- 7.Appendix: Further implications of rule combination in Breton
- Irregular verbs
- Conjugating prepositions
- Dialectal variation
Notes Abbreviations References
References (26)
Bilgin, Orhan. 2016. Frequency
effects in the processing of morphologically complex Turkish
words. Istanbul, Turkey: Boğaziçi University MA thesis.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1995. The
growth of affixes in morphological
reanalysis. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook
of morphology
1994, 1–29. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kempf, Luise & Stefan Hartmann. 2018. Schema
unification and morphological productivity: A diachronic
perspective. In Geert E. Booij (ed.), The
construction of words: Advances in Construction
Morphology, 441–474. Berlin: Springer.
Matthews, P. H. 1972. Inflectional
morphology: A theoretical study based on aspects of Latin
verb
conjugation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 2017a. Polyfunctionality
and the variety of inflectional exponence
relations. In Ferenc Kiefer, James P. Blevins & Huba Bartos (eds.), Perspectives
on morphological organization: Data and
analyses, 11–30. Leiden: Brill.
. 2017b. Rule
conflation in an inferential-realizational theory of
morphotactics. Acta
Linguistica
Academica 64(1). 79–124. [[URL]]
. 2017c. Rules
and
blocks. In Claire Bowern, Laurence Horn & Raffaella Zanuttini (eds.), On
looking into words (and
beyond), 421–440. Berlin: Language Science Press.
. 2019a. An
apparently noncanonical pattern of morphotactic
competition. In Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang Dressler & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds.), Competition
in inflection and
word-formation, 259–278. Berlin: Springer.
. 2020. Complex
exponents. In Lívia Körtvélyessy & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), Complex words: Advances in morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. To
appear. Rule conflation,
potentiation, affix
telescoping. In Andrea Sims et al. (eds), Morphological
typology and linguistic
cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Teddiman, Laura Gene Helena. 2012. An
experimental investigation of complexity-based
ordering. Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta dissertation.
Trépos, Pierre. N.d. Grammaire
bretonne. Rennes: Ouest France.
