Cover not available

In:All Things Morphology: Its independence and its interfaces
Edited by Sedigheh Moradi, Marcia Haag, Janie Rees-Miller and Andrija Petrovic
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 353] 2021
► pp. 171–198

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 10
Feature-based competition

A thousand years of Slavonic possessives

 | Surrey Morphology Group , University of Surrey
Published online: 25 August 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.353.10cor
Abstract
Competition takes many forms. A newly identified type of competition involves the featural specification of one of the competitors as a key factor. In the particular instance treated here, whether a given item has a competitor depends on its number (and sometimes its person). We focus on the use of the genitive case versus adjective-like forms in possessive expressions (broadly understood). The data come primarily from the Slavonic languages, where a surprising original system of possessive pronouns competing with personal pronouns has played out rather differently through the family. We find a variety of outcomes, from conservative to highly innovative, with some instances of competitors settling into different niches.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Feature-based competition
  • 3.Motivated feature-based competition
  • 4.Unmotivated feature-based competition
  • 5.The nature of the competition
  • 6.The competition in diachrony
    • 6.1A cautionary note
    • 6.2The key developments
      • 6.2.1Word order
      • 6.2.2The N-factor
      • 6.2.3Derivational reforming of the possessive pronoun
      • 6.2.4Loss of the dual
    • 6.3Outcomes in languages where the dual has been lost
    • 6.4Dual preserved: First outcome: Upper and Lower Sorbian
    • 6.5Dual preserved: Second outcome: Slovenian
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (94)
References
Ackermann, Tanja, Horst J. Simon & Christian Zimmer (eds.). 2018. Germanic genitives (Studies in Language Companion Series 193). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.). 2013. Possession and ownership: A cross-linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 2016. Competition and the lexicon. In Annibale Elia, Claudio Iacobini & Miriam Voghera (eds), Livelli di Analisi e fenomeni di interfaccia. Atti del XLVII congresso internazionale della società di linguistica italiana (SLI): Fisciano, Salerno 26–28 settembre 2013, 39–51. Roma: Bulzoni Editore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019a. Canonical syncretism and Chomsky’s S. In Matthew Baerman, Oliver Bond & Andrew Hippisley (eds.), Morphological perspectives, 138–147. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019b. Competitors and alternants in linguistic morphology. In Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds), Competition in inflection and word-formation (Studies in morphology 5), 39–66. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald, Anna Endresen, Laura A. Janda, Anastasia Makarova & Tore Nesset. 2013. Making choices in Russian: Pros and cons of statistical methods for rival forms. Russian Linguistics 37. 253–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bartnicka, Barbara, Björn Hansen, Wojtek Klemm, Volkmar Lehmann & Halina Satkiewicz. 2004. Grammatik des Polnischen (Slavolinguistica 5). Munich: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belić, Aleksandar. 1932. O dvojini u slovenskim jezicima. Belgrade: Srpska kraljevska Akademija.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Billings, Loren A. 1996. Sandhi phenomena and language change. In Ursula Kleinhenz (ed.) Interfaces in phonology (Studia Grammatica 41), 60–82. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Börjars, Kersti, David Denison & Alan K. Scott (eds). 2013. Morphosyntactic categories and the expression of possession (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 199). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bratishenko, Elena. 1998. Morphosyntactic variation in possessive constructions and the accusative in Old East Slavic texts. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Denominal adjective formation and suffix hierarchy in Old East Slavic. Slavic and East European Journal 49. 361–377. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Browne, Wayles. 1993. Serbo-Croat. In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic Languages, 306–387. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bugarski, Ranko. 2012. Language, identity and borders in the former Serbo-Croatian area. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 33. 219–235. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Past and current developments involving pluricentric Serbo-Croatian and its official heirs. In Tanneke Schoonheim & Johan Van Hoorde (eds.), Language variation: A factor of increasing complexity and a challenge for language policy within Europe: Contributions to the EFNIL Conference 2018 in Amsterdam, 105–114. Budapest: Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Available at: [URL]
Carlier, Anne & Jean-Christophe Verstraete (eds.). 2013. The genitive (Case and Grammatical Relations across Languages 5). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 1987. The morphology/syntax interface: Evidence from possessive adjectives in Slavonic. Language 63. 299–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. Canonical derivational morphology. Word Structure 3. 141–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. Features. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. Morphosyntactic complexity: A typology of lexical splits. Language 91. 145–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. & Wayles Browne. 2018. Serbo-Croat: Bosnian, Croatian, Montenegrin, Serbian. In Bernard Comrie (ed.), The world’s major languages, 3rd edn., 339–356. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daniel, Michael. 2015. Stem initial alternation in Russian third person pronouns: Variation in grammar. In Vladimir P. Selegej (main editor), Komp’juternaja lingvistika i intellektual’nye texnologii: po materialam ežegodnoj Meždunarodnoj konferencii “Dialog” (2015), I, 95–103. Moscow: RGGU.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dench, Alan & Nicholas Evans. 1988. Multiple case-marking in Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 8. 1–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckhoff, Hanne M. 2009. A usage-based approach to change: Old Russian possessive constructions. In Johanna Barðdal & Shobhana L. Chelliah (eds.), The role of semantic, pragmatic, and discourse factors in the development of case, 161–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. Old Russian possessive constructions: A construction grammar approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2018. Quantifying syntactic influence: Word order, possession and definiteness in Old Church Slavonic and Greek. In Jasmina Grkovic-Major, Björn Hansen & Barbara Sonnenhauser (eds.), Diachronic Slavonic syntax: The interplay between internal development, language contact and metalinguistic factors, 29–61. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckhoff, Hanne M. & Aleksandrs Berdičevskis. 2015. Linguistics vs. digital editions: The Tromsø Old Russian and OCS Treebank. Scripta & e-Scripta 14–15. 9–25.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faßke, Helmut. 1981. Grammatik der obersorbischen Schriftsprache der Gegenwart: Morphologie. Bautzen: Domowina.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferrell, James. 1958. The systems of the third person pronoun with particular reference to the category of the preposition in Slavic languages. In American Contributions to the Fourth International Congress of Slavists, Moscow, September 1958, 77–102. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feuillet, Jack. 1999. Grammaire historique du Bulgare. Paris: Institut d’Études slaves.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flier, Michael S. 1974. Aspects of nominal determination in Old Church Slavic. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 1993. Macedonian. In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic languages, 249–305. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardani, Francesco, Franz Rainer & Hans Christian Luschützky. 2019. Competition in morphology: A historical outline. In Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds), Competition in inflection and word-formation (Studies in morphology 5), 3–36. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graudina, Ljudmila K., Viktor A. Ickovič & Lija P. Katlinskaja. 1976. Grammatičeskaja pravil’nost’ russkoj reči: opyt častotno-stilističeskogo slovarja variantov. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guðmundsson, Helgi. 1972. The pronominal dual in Icelandic (University of Iceland Publications in Linguistics 2). Reykjavík: Institute of Nordic Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herrity, Peter. 2000. Slovene: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hill, Steven P. 1977. The N-factor and Russian prepositions: Their development in 11th-20th century texts. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huntley, David. 1984. The distribution of the denominative adjective and the adnominal genitive in Old Church Slavonic. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical syntax, 217–236. Berlin: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. Old Church Slavonic. In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds) The Slavonic languages, 125–187. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Isačenko, Aleksandr V. 1954. Grammatičeskij stroj russkogo jazyka v sopostavlenii s slovackim: Morfologija: I. Bratislava: Izdatel’stvo Slovackoj Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakop, Tjaša. 2008. The dual in Slovene dialects (Diversitas Linguarum 18). Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janaš, Pětr. 1984. Niedersorbische Grammatik (2nd edn.). Bautzen: Domowina.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janda, Laura A., Tore Nesset & Sergey Say. 2019. Prezidentskie vybory vs. vybory prezidenta: How to choose? Russian Linguistics 43. 181–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jentsch, Helmut. 1980. Die sorbische Mundart von Rodewitz/Spree (Schriftenreihe des Instituts für sorbische Volksforschung in Bautzen 47). Bautzen: Domowina.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars, Lidia Federica Mazzitelli & Irina Nevskaya (eds). 2019. Possession in languages of Europe and North-Central Asia (SLCS 206). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Juge, Matthew L. 2019. The sense that suppletion makes: Towards a semantic typology on diachronic principles. Transactions of the Philological Society 117. 390–414. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 2003. Possessive noun phrases in the languages of Europe. In Frans Plank (ed.), Noun phrase structure in the languages of Europe, 621–722. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kopčevskaja-Tamm, Marija [=Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria] & Aleksej Šmelev. 1994. Alešina s Mašej stat’ja (o nekotoryx svojstvax russkix pritjažatel’nyx prilagatel’nyx). Scando-Slavica 40. 209–228. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Křivan, Jan. 2019. Pronominal and adjectival attributive possession in spoken Czech: A usage-based perspective. In Lars Johanson, Lidia Federica Mazzitelli & Irina Nevskaya (eds.), Possession in languages of Europe and North-Central Asia, 149–168. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lander, Yury A. 2009. Varieties of genitive. In Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of case, 581–592. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liljegren, Henrik. 2016. A grammar of Palula (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 8). Berlin: Language Science Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 1995. A proposito dell’alternanza esce, usciva, in italiano. Lingua Nostra 56. 37–41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matasović, Ranko. 2010. Possessive genitives and adjectives from the historical point of view. In Motoki Nomachi (ed.), The Grammar of possessivity in South Slavic languages: Synchronic and diachronic perspectives (Slavic Eurasian Studies 24), 1–12. Hokkaido: Slavic-Eurasian Research Center.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter H. 1997. The concise Oxford dictionary of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayo, Peter. 1993. Belorussian. In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic languages, 887–946. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor’ A. 1985. Poverxnostnyj sintaksis russkix čislovyx vyraženij. Vienna: Institut für Slawistik der Universität Wien. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Minlos, Philip. 2012. Prenominal and postnominal position of adjective attributes in Old Russian. Russian Linguistics 36. 21–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina & Andrew Spencer. 2013. Possession and modification – a perspective from Canonical Typology. In Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax, 207–238. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. Mixed categories: The morphosyntax of noun modification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Connor, Catherine, Joan Maling & Barbora Skarabela. 2013. Nominal categories and the expression of possession: A cross-linguistic study of probabilistic tendencies and categorical constraints. In Kersti Börjars, David Denison & Alan Scott (eds.), Morphosyntactic categories and the expression of possession, 89–121. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olander, Thomas. 2015. Proto-Slavic inflectional morphology: A comparative handbook. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Payne, John & Eva Berlage. 2014. Genitive variation: The niche role of the oblique genitive. English Language and Linguistics 18(2). 331–360. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Philippova, Tatiana. 2018. Prepositional repercussions in Russian: Pronouns, comparatives and ellipsis. Beersheba, Israel: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev thesis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ponsonnet, Maïa. In preparation. Possession. In Claire Bowern (ed.), Oxford handbook of Australian languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Priestly, Tom M. S. 1993. Slovene. In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic languages, 388–451. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pugh, Stefan M. & Ian Press. 1999. Ukrainian: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richards, Karen Rondestvedt. 1976. Toward a history of the possessive in literary Russian: The demise of the possessive adjective. In Sanford B. Steever, Carol A. Walker & Salikoko S. Mufwene (eds.), Papers from the parasession on diachronic syntax, 260–273. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenbach, Anette. 2014. English genitive variation – the state of the art. English Language and Linguistics 18(2). 215–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Round, Erich & Greville G. Corbett. 2020. Comparability and measurement in typological science: The bright future for linguistics. Linguistic Typology 24(3). 489–525. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scatton, Ernest A. 1993. Bulgarian. In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic languages, 188–248. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmalstieg, William R. 1983. An introduction to Old Church Slavic (2nd edn., revised and expanded). Columbus, OH: Slavica.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scholze, Lenka. 2008. Das grammatische System der obersorbischen Umgangssprache im Sprachkontakt: mit Grammatiktafeln im Anhang (Schriften des Sorbischen Instituts 45). Bautzen: Domowina.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Short, David. 1993a. Czech. In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic languages, 455–532. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993b. Slovak. In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic languages, 533–592. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Šmeleva, T. V. 2008. Pritjažatel’nye prilagatel’nye: Počemu ne sbyvaetsja vinogradovskij prognoz? In А. Mustajoki, M. V. Kopotev, L. A. Birjulin & E. Ju. Protasova (eds.), Instrumentarij rusistiki: korpusnye podxody (Slavica Helsingiensia 34), 358–371. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 2002. Gender as an inflectional category. Journal of Linguistics 38. 279–312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Lexical relatedness: A paradigm-based model. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas, Sonja Kettler, Cornelia Stroh & Aina Urdze. 2008. Split possession: An areal-linguistic study of the alienability correlation and related phenomena in the languages of Europe (Studies in Language Companion Series 101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stone, Gerald. 1993. Sorbian (Upper and Lower). In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic languages, 593–685. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory. 2016. Inflectional paradigms: Content and form at the syntax-morphology interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. An apparently noncanonical pattern of morphotactic competition. In Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds) Competition in inflection and word-formation (Studies in morphology 5), 259–278. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suprun, Adam E. 1969. Slavjanskie čislitel’nye (stanovlenie čislitel’nyx kak osoboj časti reči). Minsk: Belorussian State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tesnière, Lucien. 1925. Les formes du duel en slovène. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thornton, Anna. 2019a. Overabundance in morphology. In Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019b. Overabundance: A canonical typology. In Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds.) Competition in inflection and word-formation (Studies in morphology 5), 223–258. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Timberlake, Alan. 2004. A reference grammar of Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S. 1937. O pritjažatel’nyx prilagatel’nyx (possessiva) starocerkovno-slavjanskogo jazyka. Zbornik lingvističkih i filoloskih rasprava A. Beliću o četrdesetogodišnjici njegova naučnog rada posvećuju njegovi prijatelji i učenici, 15–20. Belgrade: Mlada Srbija.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vaillant, André. 1964. Manuel du vieux slave: I: Grammaire (2nd edn.). Paris: Institut d’Études slaves.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1977. Grammaire comparée des langues slaves: V: La syntaxe. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Večerka, Radoslav. 1989. Altkirchenslavische (Altbulgarische) Syntax: I: Die lineare Satzorganisation. Freiburg im Breisgau: U.W. Weiher.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Volk, Vitalij S. 2014. Sintaksis pritjažatel’nyx mestoimenij i ad’’ektivnja derivacija. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana: Trudy instituta lingvističeskix issledovanij 2. 510–533: [URL]
Williams, Edwin. 2007. Dumping lexicalism. In Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 353–381. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Žolobov, Oleg F. 1998. Symbolik und historische Dynamik des slavischen Duals / Simvolika i istoričeskaja dinamika slavjanskogo dvojstvennogo čisla (Beiträge zur Slavistik 35). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Žolobov, Oleg F. & Vadim B. Krys’ko. 2001. Dvojstvennoe čislo. Moscow: Azbukovnik.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue