In:All Things Morphology: Its independence and its interfaces
Edited by Sedigheh Moradi, Marcia Haag, Janie Rees-Miller and Andrija Petrovic
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 353] 2021
► pp. 117–126
Chapter 7Major lexical categories and graphemic weight
Published online: 25 August 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.353.07ber
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.353.07ber
Abstract
English spelling has a very interesting
regularity: there exists a minimum word length for lexical words.
Words of this class have to be at least three letters long, even if
they consist of only two phonemes and could be spelled with two
letters (e.g., ebb/*eb, egg/*eg).
This regularity does not hold for function words (e.g.,
a, I, be,
he, it, etc.). This means that
an important distinction between words (lexical vs. functional) is
mirrored in the writing system. In a study of Early Modern English
texts, I demonstrate that this regularity evolved gradually over the
course of 200 years. This is a case of self-organization in
spelling: without explicit guidance or regulation, the pattern
emerged in usage. The proposed function of having separate
constraints for the length of lexical words and function words is a reading aid.
Keywords: English, lexical words, grammatical words, spelling, self-organization
Article outline
- 1.How did we get here?
- 2.The three letter rule
- 3.Why this regularity?
- 4.Methodology
- 5.Results
- 6.Discussion
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (12)
Baayen, R. Harald, Richard Piepenbrock, & Leon Gulikers. 1995. The
CELEX lexical database
(CD-ROM). Linguistic Data Consortium. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
Berg, Kristian & Mark Aronoff. 2017. Self-organization
in the spelling of English suffixes: The emergence of
culture out of
anarchy. Language 93. 37–64.
Evertz, Martin. 2018. Visual
prosody: The graphematic foot in English and
German. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Jespersen, Otto. 1909. A
modern English grammar: On historical principles. Part 1:
Sounds and
spelling. Oxon: Routledge.
