In:Perfects in Indo-European Languages and Beyond
Edited by Robert Crellin and Thomas Jügel
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 352] 2020
► pp. 377–410
Chapter 11The Hittite periphrastic perfect
Published online: 23 September 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.352.11ing
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.352.11ing
Abstract
In Hittite, the meaning associated with the Proto-Indo-European perfect, i.e. to indicate a state
resulting from a change-of-state event, was covered by compound verb forms consisting of the -ant- participle
plus the finite forms of the verbs ḫar(k)- “have” and eš- “be”. The origin and the function
of this construction have been a matter of debate. In this chapter, we review the standard description of the Hittite
periphrastic perfect, and reassess its status and function based on an analysis of its occurrences in texts ranging from Old
to New Hittite. We argue that periphrastic forms involving ḫar(k)-/eš- and the participle
instantiate three different constructions: the stative construction and two distinct auxiliary verb constructions, i.e. the
passive and the perfect. We also suggest that the stative construction was probably the most ancient, and that the perfect
construction, which functions as an anterior, constitutes a later development.
Keywords: Hittite, anterior, passive, resultative, auxiliary verb construction
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Aims and structure of the chapter
- 1.2The Anatolian verbal system in an Indo-European perspective
- 2.Periphrastic perfect constructions in a cross-linguistic perspective
- 2.1Typology of periphrastic constructions
- 2.2Aspect and actionality
- 3.Current research and open issues
- 3.1ḫark- and eš- constructions
- 3.2Semantics of the Hittite participle
- 3.3The periphrastic passive construction
- 3.4Formal aspects of ḫark- and eš- constructions
- 3.5Relationship between ḫark- and eš- constructions
- 4.AVC or stative construction?
- 4.1Imperative
- 4.2Indicative
- 4.2.1With ḫark-
- 4.2.2With eš-
- 4.3Discussion
- 5.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (62)
Benveniste, Émile. 1962. Hittite
et indo-européen: études comparatives (Bibliothèque archéologique et historique de l’Institut
Français d’Archéologie d’Istanbul
5). Paris: Maisonneuve.
Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 1986. Tempo, aspetto e azione nel
verbo italiano. Florence: Accademia della Crusca.
Bertinetto, Pier Marco & Valentina Cambi. 2006. Hittite
temporal adverbials and the aspectual interpretation of the ške/a-
suffix. In Raffaella Bombi et al. (eds.), Studi
linguistici in onore di Roberto
Gusmani, 193–233. Alessandria: L’Orso.
Boley, Jacqueline. 1984. The
Hittite ḫark- construction (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft
44). Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.
. 2001. An
intransitive ḫark-? In Gernot Wilhelm (ed.), Akten
des IV. Internationalen Kongresses für Hethitologie. Würzburg, 4–8 Oktober 1999 (Studien zu
den Boğazköy-Texten
45), 40–50. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Botne, Robert. 2003. To
die across languages: Toward a typology of achievement verbs. Linguistic
Typology 7. 233–278.
Boyer, James L. 1987. A classification of
imperatives: a statistical study. Grace Theological
Journal 8. 35–54.
van Brock, Nadia. 1964. Les
themes verbaux à redoublement du hittite et le verbe indo-européen. Revue hittite et
asianique 22:75. 119–165.
Brosman, Paul W. 2010. The
nt-participle and verbal adjectives in
*-to-. Indogermanische
Forschungen 115. 22–34.
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The
evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the
world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Cambi, Valentina. 2005. The
Hittite adverb karū: ‘formerly, earlier;
already’. In Karlene Jones-Bley, Martin E. Huld, Angela Della Volpe & Miriam Robbins Dexter (eds.), Proceedings
of the sixteenth annual UCLA Indo-European Conference. Los Angeles. November
5–6, 2004 (Journal of Indo-European Monograph Series
50), 219–234. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man.
. 2007. Tempo
e Aspetto in ittito: con particolare riferimento al suffisso ske/a- (Memorie del Laboratorio
di linguistica della Scuola normale superiore di Pisa
6). Alessandria: L’Orso.
Carruba, Onofrio (ed.). 1992. Per
una grammatica ittita/Towards a Hittite grammar (Studia Mediterranea
7). Pavia: Iuculano.
Cennamo, Michela. 2006. The
rise and grammaticalization paths of Latin fieri and facere as passive
auxiliaries. In Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds.), Passivization
and typology: form and function (Typological Studies in Language
68), 311–336. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cotticelli Kurras, Paola. 1991. Das
hethitische Verbum ‘sein’: Syntaktische Untersuchungen (Texte der Hethiter
18). Heidelberg: Winter.
Dardano, Paola. 2005. I
costrutti perifrastici con il verbo ḫar(k)- dell’ittito: stato della questione e prospettive di
metodo. Orientalia 74. 93–113.
. 2014. Das
hethitische Partizip – eine Frage der Diathese? In Piotr Taracha (ed.) with
the assistance of Magdalena Kapeluś, Proceedings
of the Eighth International Congress of Hittitology, Warsaw, 5–9 September
2011, 236–262. Warsaw: Agade.
Dempsey, Timothy R. 2015. Verbal reduplication in
Anatolian. Los Angeles, CA: University of California dissertation.
Doiz-Bienzobas, Aintzane. 2002. The
preterite and the imperfect as grounding
predications. In Frank Brisard (ed.), Grounding:
The epistemic footing of deixis and reference (Cognitive Linguistics Research
21), 299–347. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Dressler, Wolfgang. 1968. Studien
zur verbalen Pluralität. Iterativum, Distributivum, Durativum, Intensivum in der allgemeinen Grammatik, im
Lateinischen und Hethitischen (Sitzungsberichte der Österreichischen Akademie der
Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-Historische Klasse 259,
1). Vienna: Böhlau.
Engerer, Volkmar. 2014. Phases
in verbal semantics. In Klaus Robering (ed.), Events,
arguments and aspects: Topics in the semantics of verbs (Studies in Language Companion Series
152), 227–260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Frotscher, Michael. 2013. Das
hethitische -ant-Partizip und seine indogermanischen Grundlagen. Semantik, Morphologie,
Syntax. Verona: Università degli Studi di Verona dissertation.
Garrett, Andrew J. 1996. Wackernagel’s Law and
Unaccusativity in Hittite. In Aaron L. Halpern & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds.), Approaching
second: Second position clitics and related phenomena (CSLI Lecture Notes
61), 85–133. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Givón, Talmy. 1982. Tense-Aspect-Modality:
The Creole prototype and beyond. In Paul J. Hopper (ed.), Tense-Aspect:
Between semantics and pragmatics. Containing the contributions to a Symposium on Tense and Aspect, held at UCLA, May
1979 (Typological Studies in Language
1), 115–163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Harry, J. E. 1905. The
perfect subjunctive, optative and imperative in Greek. Classical
Review 19. 347–354.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1990. The
grammaticization of passive morphology. Studies in
Language 14. 25–72.
. 2000. Periphrasis. In Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann, Joachim Mugdan & Stavros Skopeteas (eds.), Morphology:
An international handbook on inflection and word-formation (Handbücher zur Sprach- und
Kommunikationswissenschaft
17.1), 654–664. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
HED = Puhvel, Jaan. 1984. Hittite
etymological dictonary, vol. 1–2 (Trends in
linguistics. Documentation 1). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Heine, Bernd. 1993. Auxiliaries:
Cognitive forces and grammaticalization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hoffner, Harry A. Jr. & H. Craig Melchert. 2008. A
grammar of the Hittite language. Part I: reference grammar (Languages of the Ancient Near East
1). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
Houwink ten Cate, Philo H. J. 1973. Impersonal and
reflexive constructions of the predicative participle in
Hittite. In Martin Adrianus Beek, Arie A. Kapman, Cornelis Nijland & Jaques Ryckmans (eds.), Symbolae
biblicae et mesopotamicae Francisco Mario Theodoro de Liagre Böhl dedicatae (Studia Francisci
Scholten memoriae dicata
4), 199–210. Leiden: Brill.
Huggard, Mattyas G. 2015. Wh-words in Hittite: A
study in syntax-semantics and syntax-phonology interfaces. Los Angeles, CA: University of California dissertation.
HW2 = Friedrich, Johannes, Annelies Kammenhuber & Inge Hoffmann. 2007. Hethitisches
Wörterbuch, vol. 3.1 ḫa-ḫaz (Indogermanische
Bibliothek: Reihe 2:
Wörterbücher) Heidelberg: Winter.
Inglese, Guglielmo & Simone Mattiola. Forthcoming. The
Hittite suffix -ške/a- between verbal aspect and pluractionality: a typological
approach. To appear in STUF - Linguistic Typology and
Universals.
2018. What happened to the
Perfect in Hittite? A contribution to the theory of the
*h2e-conjugation. In Elisabeth Rieken (ed.), 100
Jahre Entzifferung des Hethitischen: morphosyntaktische Kategorie in Sprachgeschichte und Forschung. Akten der
Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 21. bis 23 September 2015 in
Marburg, 137–156. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
Kloekhorst, Alwin. 2008. Etymological
dictionary of the Hittite inherited lexicon (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary
Series
5). Leiden: Brill.
Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic
introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Loporcaro, Michele. 1998. Sintassi
comparata dell’accordo participiale romanzo (Linguistica
17). Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.
. 1998. I
verbi ausiliari in ittita. In Giuliano Bernini, Pierluigi Cuzzolin & Piera Molinelli (eds.), Ars
Linguistica: studi offerti da colleghi ed allievi a Paolo Ramat in occasione del suo 60.
compleanno, 299–322. Roma: Bulzoni.
. 2010. Transitivity, intransitivity and diathesis in
Hittite. ИНДОЕВРОПЕЙСКОЕ ЯЗЫКОЗНАНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ
ФИЛОЛОГИЯ [Indo-European linguistics and classical
philology] 16. 133–154.
Luraghi, Silvia, Anna Pompei & Stavros Skopeteas. 2005. Ancient
Greek (Languages of the World. Materials
213). Munich: Lincom Europa.
Luraghi, Silvia & Claudia Parodi. 2008. Key
terms in syntax and syntactic
theory. London: Continuum.
Melchert, Craig. H. 1997. Traces of a PIE
Aspectual Contrast in Anatolian? Incontri
Linguistici 20. 83–92.
Melchert, Craig H. 2003. Language. In Craig H. Melchert (ed.), The
Luwians (Handbook of Oriental Studies 1: The Near and Middle East
68), 170–210. Leiden: Brill.
Forthcoming. The
medio-passive in transition from Old to New Hittite. To appear in a forthcoming
Festschrift.
Nedjalkov, Vladimir. P. 2001. Resultative
constructions. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language
typology and language
universals, vol. II (Handbücher zur Sprach-
und Kommunikationswissenschaft
20/2), 928–940. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Neu, Erich. 1968. Das
hethitische Mediopassiv und seine indogermanischen Grundlagen (Studien zu den Boğazköy-Texten
6). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Reichmuth, Silvio. 2011. Mita
von Pahhuwa (CTH 146). In Robert Fischer, Detlev Groddek, & Henning Marquardt (eds.), Hethitologie
in Dresden: Textbearbeitungen, Arbeiten zur Forschungs- und Schriftgeschichte (Dresdner
Beiträge zur Hethitologie
35), 109–143. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Schwyzer, Eduard & Albert Debrunner. 1950. Griechische
Grammatik auf der Grundlage von Karl Brugmanns griechischer Grammatik. Syntax und syntaktische
Stilistik (Handbuch der Altertumswissenschaft
2.1.2). Munich: Beck.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Feltgen, Quentin
Kim, Ronald I.
Inglese, Guglielmo
Luraghi, Silvia, Guglielmo Inglese & Daniel Kölligan
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
