Cover not available

In:Perfects in Indo-European Languages and Beyond
Edited by Robert Crellin and Thomas Jügel
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 352] 2020
► pp. 245–278

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 7
The synthetic perfect from Indo-Iranian to Late Vedic

ORCiD logo with link | UiT – The Arctic University of Norway
Published online: 23 September 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.352.07dah
Abstract
This paper outlines the origin and development of the synthetic Perfect from Indo-Iranian, the reconstructed common ancestral stage of the Iranian and Indo-Aryan languages, to Vedic, the oldest attested stage of Old Indo-Aryan. Comparative evidence from Old Iranian, Homeric Greek and a number of other Indo-European languages shows that this morphological category ultimately originates from Proto-Indo-European. In the course of its history, the synthetic Perfect develops from a P-oriented stative construction in Indo-European, via an anterior construction in Indo-Iranian to a general past tense with an emerging indirect evidential sense in Old Indo-Aryan. The present contribution highlights the various stages of development reflected in Vedic, but it also includes reference to the Indo-Iranian prehistory of the Vedic Perfect, as well as to its demise in later stages of Indo-Aryan. The development of the Indo-Iranian Perfect indicates that anterior categories tend to be rather unstable diachronically.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical and philological preliminaries
    • 2.1Theoretical considerations
    • 2.2Philological preliminaries
  • 3.The synthetic perfect in Indo-Iranian
    • 3.1The Proto-Indo-Iranian situation
    • 3.2Outline of the development of the synthetic Perfect in Old Iranian
  • 4.The synthetic Perfect in Old Indo-Aryan
    • 4.1The synthetic Perfect in Early Vedic
    • 4.2The synthetic Perfect in Middle Vedic
      • 4.2.1The Early Middle Vedic Perfect
      • 4.2.2The Perfect in Middle Vedic Proper
    • 4.3The synthetic Perfect in Late Vedic
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (40)
References
Amano, Kyoko. 2009. Maytrāyaṇī Saṃhitā I-II. Übersetzung der Prosapartien mit Kommentar zur Lexik und Syntax der älteren vedischen Prosa (Münchener Forschungen zur historischen Sprachwissenschaft 9). Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, Dipak. 1997. The Paippalāda-Saṃhitā of the Atharvaveda (Bibliotheca Indica 319). Calcutta: The Asiatic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Botne, Robert & Tiffany L. Kershner. 2008. Tense and cognitive space: On the organization of tense/aspect systems in Bantu languages and beyond. Cognitive Linguistics 19. 145–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins and William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardona, George. 2002. The Old Indo-Aryan tense system. Journal of the American Oriental Society 122 (Indic and Iranian Studies in Honor of Stanley Insler on His Sixty-Fifth Birthday), 235–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahl, Eystein. 2010. Time, tense and aspect in Early Vedic grammar: Exploring inflectional semantics in the Rigveda (Brill’s Studies in Indo-European Languages & Linguistics 5). Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011a. Tense and aspect in Indo-Iranian Part 1: The present and aorist. Language and Linguistics Compass 5. 265–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. Tense and aspect in Indo-Iranian Part 2: The perfect, futurate, participial and periphrastic categories. Language and Linguistics Compass 5. 282–296. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Evidence for evidentiality in Late Vedic. Klein & Yoshida (eds.), 9–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Typological change in Vedic: The development of the aorist from a perfective past to an immediate past. In Folke Josephson & Ingmar Söhrman (eds.), Diachronic and typological perspectives on verbs (Studies in Language Companion Series 134), 261–298. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. The development of the Vedic perfect: From anterior present to inferential past. In Jared Klein & Elizabeth Tucker (eds.), Vedic and Sanskrit historical linguistics: Papers of the 13th World Sanskrit Conference III, 179–242. New Delhi: Motilal Banarshidass.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Toward a formal model of semantic change: A neo-Reichenbachian approach to the development of the Vedic past tense system. Lingua Posnaniensis 57. 41–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. Tense and temporal remoteness in the Old Indo-Aryan verbal system: A multidimensional timeline approach. In Vit Bubenik, Bridget Drinka, John Hewson & Ondřej Sefčik (eds.), Exploring universals of tense and aspect, 129–153. Hamburg: Baar.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold. 1897. Vergleichende Syntax der indogermanischen Sprachen. Vol. II. Strassburg: Trübner. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Di Giovine, Paolo. 1990. Studio sul perfetto indoeuropeo I: La funzione originaria del perfetto studiata nella documentazione delle lingue storiche (Biblioteca di ricerche linguistiche e filologiche 26). Roma: Dipartimento di studi glottoantropologici dell’Università di Roma “La Sapienza”.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996a. Studio sul perfetto indoeuropeo II: La posizione del perfetto all’interno del sistema verbale indoeuropeo (Biblioteca di ricerche linguistiche e filologiche 40). Roma: Il Calamo/Dipartimento di studi glottoantropologici dell’Università di Roma “La Sapienza”.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996b. Studio sul perfetto indoeuropeo III: Indici (Biblioteca di ricerche linguistiche e filologiche 41). Roma: Il Calamo/Dipartimento di studi glottoantropologici dell’Università di Roma “La Sapienza”.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eberle, Kurt & Walter Kasper. 1994. French past tenses and temporal structure. In Rolf Thieroff & Joachim Ballweg (eds.), Tense systems in European languages (Linguistische Arbeiten 308), 149–172. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Griffiths, Arlo. 2009. The Paippalādasaṃhitā of the Atharvaveda: Kāṇḍas 6 & 7 (Groningen Oriental Studies 22). Groningen: Forsten.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey L. J. 2008. Alignment change in Iranian languages: A construction grammar approach (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 37). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Karl & Bernhard Forssman. 2004. Avestische Laut- und Flexionslehre. 2nd revised and extended edition. (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 115). Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Humbach, Helmut, Josef Elfenbein and Prods O. Skjærvø. 1991. The Gāthās of Zarathushtra and the other Old Avestan texts I: Introduction – Text and translation. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jamison, Stephanie W. & Joel P. Brereton. 2014. The Rigveda: The earliest religious poetry of India. Translated by Stephanie W. Jamison and Joel P. Brereton. 3 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Jay H. 1978. Stative and middle in Indo-European (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 23). Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamp, Hans & Uwe Reyle. 1993. From discourse to logic: Introduction to modeltheoretic semantics of natural language, formal logic and discourse representation theory (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophie 42). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keith, Arthur B. 1920. Rigveda Brahmanas: The Aitareya and Kauṣītaki Brāhmaṇas of the Rigveda (Harvard Oriental Series 25). Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kent, Roland G. 1953. Old Persian: Grammar, texts, lexicon (American Oriental Series 33). New Haven, Conn.: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1998. Aspect and event structure in Vedic. The yearbook of South Asian languages and linguistics 1998. 29–62.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Event structure and the perfect. In David I. Beaver, Luis D. Casillas Martínez, Brady Z. Clark & Stefan Kaufmann (eds.) The construction of meaning, 113–136. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, Jared S. 1978. The particle u in the Rigveda: A synchronic and diachronic study (Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung. Ergänzungsheft 27). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1985. Toward a discourse grammar of the Rigveda. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, Jared S. & Kazuhiko Yoshida (eds.). 2012. Indic across the millennia. From the Rigveda to Modern Indo-Aryan. Proceedings of the linguistics section. 14th World Sanskrit Conference, Kyoto, Japan, September 1–5 2009. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kobayashi, Masato. 2012. Information structure and the particles vái and evá in Vedic prose. In Klein & Yoshida (eds.), 77–92.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid. 2013. Language vs. grammatical tradition in Ancient India: How real was Pāṇinian Sanskrit? Evidence from the history of late Sanskrit passives and pseudo-passives. Folia Linguistica Historica 34. 59–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kümmel, Martin J. 2000. Das Perfekt im Indoiranischen: Eine Untersuchung der Form und Funktion einer ererbten Kategorie des Verbums und ihrer Weiterentwicklung in den altindoiranischen Sprachen. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olivelle, Patrick. 1996. Upaniṣads: A new translation by Patrick Olivelle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of symbolic logic. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skjærvø, Prods O. 2009. Old Iranian. In Gernot Windfuhr (ed.), The Iranian languages, 43–195. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Witzel, Michael. 1989. Tracing the Vedic dialects. In Colette Caillat (ed.), Dialectes dans les littératures indo-aryennes: Actes du colloque international, org. par l’UA 1058, Paris (Fondation Hugot), 16–18 sept. 1986 (Publications de l’institut de civilisation indienne 55), 97–264. Paris: Boccard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Early Indian history: Linguistic and textual parameters. In George Erdosy (ed.), Language, material culture and ethnicity. The Indo-Aryans of ancient South Asia (Indian Philology and South Asian Studies 1), 85–125. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue