Cover not available

In:Advances in Iranian Linguistics
Edited by Richard K. Larson, Sedigheh Moradi and Vida Samiian
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 351] 2020
► pp. 85–106

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 5
The pronoun-to-agreement cycle in Iranian

Subjects do, objects don’t

 | University of Bamberg
Published online: 22 July 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.351.05hai
Abstract
There is a broad consensus within linguistics that personal pronouns may undergo grammaticalization to yield person agreement morphology. Furthermore, it is widely assumed that similar processes apply to both subject and object pronouns. In this chapter I consider the fate of a phonologically identical set of clitic pronouns in Middle West Iranian languages, which were deployed in both subject and object indexing. The modern outcomes have been rather different; while erstwhile clitic subject pronouns have spawned subject agreement morphology in some languages, these clitic pronouns have not yielded obligatory object agreement in the category of person in any Iranian language. Neither traditional grammaticalization theory, nor recent formalizations of grammaticalization within Minimalism, offer a compelling explanation for this asymmetry. I suggest it reflects a fundamental difference in the informativity of subject as opposed to object indexing with respect to the category of person, as opposed to that of gender and number.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The agreement cycle according to van Gelderen (2011b)
    • 2.1The agreement cycle with subject pronouns
    • 2.2The agreement cycle with object pronouns
  • 3.Clitic pronouns and agreement in Iranian
    • 3.1Clitic pronouns indexing subjects (A)
    • 3.2Clitic pronouns indexing objects
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (39)
References
Adibifar, Shirin. 2016. Multi-CAST Persian. In Geoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts. [URL] (25 June, 2019).
Baker, Mark. 2011. When agreement is for number and gender but not person. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29. 875–915. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dabir-Moghaddam, Mohammad. 2008. On agent clitics in Balochi in comparison with other Iranian languages. In Carina Jahani, Agnes Korn & Paul Titus (eds.), The Baloch and others, 83–100. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fonseca-Greber, Bonnibeth. 2000. The change from pronoun to clitic and the rise of null subjects in spoken Swiss French. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuß, Eric. 2005. The rise of agreement. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van. 2011a. The grammaticalization of agreement. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly. 2011b. The linguistic cycle. Language change and the language faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1976. Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In Charles Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 151–188. New York: Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hadjidas, Harris & Maria Vollmer. 2015. Multi-CAST Cypriot Greek. In Geoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual Corpus of Annotated Spoken Texts. [URL] (25 June, 2019).
Haig, Geoffrey. 2008. Alignment change in Iranian languages: A construction grammar approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Deconstructing Iranian ergativity. In Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa Travis (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ergativity, 465–500. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018a. Grammaticalization and inflectionalization in Iranian. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), Grammaticalization from a typological perspective, 57–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018b. The grammaticalization of object pronouns: Why differential object indexing is an attractor state. Linguistics 56(4). 781–818. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey & Širin Adibifar. 2019. Referential Null Subjects (RNS) in colloquial spoken Persian: Does speaker familiarity have an impact? In Alireza Korangy & Behrooz Mahmoodi-Bakhtiari (eds.), Essays on the typology of Iranian languages, 102–121. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey & Hanna Thiele. 2015. Multi-CAST Northern Kurdish. In Geoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST Multilingual Corpus of Annotated Spoken Texts. [URL] (25 June, 2019).
Jügel, Thomas. 2015. Die Entwicklung der Ergativkonstruktion im Alt- und Mitteliranischen: Eine korpusbasierte Untersuchung zu Kasus, Kongruenz und Satzbau. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan. 2003. Syntactic categories and Persian stress. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21. 333–379. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans. 2000. Jespersen’s Cycle revisited: Formal properties of grammaticalization. In Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas & Anthony Warner (eds.), Diachronic syntax: Models and mechanisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Korn, Agnes. 2009. Western Iranian pronominal clitics. Orientalia Suecana 58. 159–171.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert. 2006 [1957]. Grammaire du persan contemporain. Nouvelle edition avec la collaboration de Yann Richard, Rokhsareh Hechmati et Pollet Samvelian. Téhéran: Institut Français de Recherche en Iran. [Originally published 1957.]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lecoq, Pierre. 1979. Le dialecte de Sivand. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacKenzie, David. 1961. Kurdish dialect studies, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1962. Kurdish dialect studies, vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1966. The dialect of Awroman (Hawrāmān-ī Luhōn). Grammatical sketch, texts, and vocabulary. København: Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Öpengin, Ergin. 2013. Clitic/affix interactions: A corpus-based study of person marking in the Mukri variety of Central Kurdish. Paris III/Bamberg dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. The Mukri variety of Central Kurdish: Grammar, texts and lexicon. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Accounting for the combinations of clitic and affix person markers in Central Kurdish. In Gündoğdu, Songül, Ergin Öpengin, Geoffrey Haig & Erik Anonby (eds.), Current Issues in Kurdish Linguistics, 243–261. Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Öpengin, Ergin & Masoud Mohammadirad. Forthcoming. Formal and functional variation in pronominal clitics across Kurdish: documentation and explanations. In Yaron Matras, Ergin Öpengin & Geoffrey Haig (eds.), Structural and typological variation in the dialects of Kurdish. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Paul, Ludwig. 1998. Zazaki. Grammatik und Versuch einer Dialektologie. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rasekh, Mohammad. 2014. Persian clitics: Doubling and agreement. Journal of Modern Languages 24(1). 16–33. [URL] (10 October, 2017).
Samvelian, Pollet. 2007. What Sorani Kurdish absolute prepositions tell us about cliticization. In Frederick Hoyt, Nikki Seifert, Alexandra Teodorescu & Jessica White (eds.) Proceedings of the Texas Linguistic Society IX: The morphosyntax of understudied languages, 265–285. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI online publications. [URL] (accessed 10 October 2017).
Schiering, René. 2005. Cliticization and the evolution of morphology: A cross-linguistic study on phonology in grammaticalization. Konstanz: University of Konstanz dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schnell, Stefan. 2018. Whence subject-verb agreement? Investigating the role of topicality, accessibility, and frequency in Vera’a texts. Linguistics 56(4). 735–780. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 1999. From anaphoric pronoun to grammatical agreement marker: Why objects donʼt make it. Folia Linguistica 33(1–2). 225–251.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stilo, Don. 2018. The Caspian region and South Azerbaijan: Caspian and Tatic. In Geoffrey Haig & Geoffrey Khan (eds.), The languages and linguistics of Western Asia. An areal perspective, 659–824. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena & Catherine Travis. 2019. Variationist typology: Shared probabilistic constraints across (non-)null subject languages. Linguistics 57(3). 653–692. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Shokouhi, Hossein
2025. Persian Deixis in the Flow of Conversation. Studia Linguistica 79:3 ► pp. 469 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue