Cover not available

In:Historical Linguistics 2017: Selected papers from the 23rd International Conference on Historical Linguistics, San Antonio, Texas, 31 July – 4 August 2017
Edited by Bridget Drinka
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 350] 2020
► pp. 473–488

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Neuters to none

A diachronic perspective on loanword gender in Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian

 | Middle East Technical University, North Cyprus Campus
Published online: 9 July 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.350.22wal
Abstract
This study documents a diachronic change in the status of neuter noun gender in Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian (BCS). Previous research demonstrates that the neuter class is closed in BCS (Simonović 2010), and that recent loanwords from western European languages fitting its phonological profile are instead classed as masculine. I show that this is not the case for earlier loanwords from Turkish. New neuter nouns are still accepted, and when changed, are classed as feminine, not masculine. This follows an attested pattern of assigning gender according to lexical distributions. An account of gender assignment utilizing Optimality Theory and incorporating gradiently-ranked constraints captures this pattern in which rankings can shift over time, thus leading to the observed historical changes in rates of neuter gender assignment.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Noun gender in BCS
  • 3.BCS Loanwords and Gender
    • 3.1Corpus 1
    • 3.2Corpus 2
    • 3.3Corpus 3
    • 3.4Summary
  • 4.Comparison across time and space
    • 4.1South Slavic
    • 4.2Outside Slavic
    • 4.3Summary
  • 5.Formalization
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (23)
References
Ban, L. & Matovac, D. (2012). On Turkish loanwords in Croatian language. Trakya Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 2:4, 155–166.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Becker, M., Ketrez, N. & Nevins, A. (2011). The surfeit of the stimulus: Analytic biases filter lexical statistics in Turkish laryngeal alternations. Language 87:1, 84–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, P. & Hayes, B. (2001). Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 45–86.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cahen, L. (1920). Serbian-English and English-Serbian pocket dictionary. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ernestus, M. & Baayen, H. (2003). Predicting the unpredictable: Interpreting neutralized segments in Dutch. Language 79, 5–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedman, V. (2003). Turkish in Macedonia and beyond: Studies in contact, typology and other phenomena in the Balkans and the Caucasus. Turcologica 52. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hudson Kam, C. L. & Newport, E. L. (2005). Regularizing unpredictable variation: The roles of adult and child learners in language formation and change. Language Learning and Development, 1:2, 151–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Getting it right by getting it wrong: When learners change languages. Cognitive Psychology 59:1, 30–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W. (1997). The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamusella, T. (2012). The politics of language and nationalism in modern central Europe. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manova, S. & W. U. Dressler. (2001). Gender and declensional class in Bulgarian. Wiener Linguistische Gazette, 67, 45–81.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mønnesland, S. (1973). Loanwords in the two variants of Serbo-Croatian. Scando-Slavica, 19:1, 197–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rice, C. (2006). Optimizing gender. Lingua, 116, 1394–1417. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simonović, M. (2010). Lexeme formation, morphological parsing and constituency in loanword adaptation: A case study from Slovenian and Serbo-Croatian. Poster presented at the 14th International Morphology Meeting, Budapest, Hungary.
Sjoberg, M. J. (1972). Turkish loanwords in the language of Aleksa Šantić. PhD dissertation, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Škaljić, A. (1966). Turcizmi u srpskohrvatskom jeziki [Turkisms in the Serbo-Croatian language]. Sarajevo: Svjetlost Izdavačko Preduzeće.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trueswell, J. C. (1996). The role of lexical frequency in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 566–585. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walter, M. A. (2011). Probability matching in Arabic and Romance morphology. In E. Broselow & H. Ouali (Eds.), Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Probability matching and Macedonian gender morphology: The case of Turkish loanword adaptation. Presentation at the 11th Conference on Formal Description of Slavic Languages. Potsdam, Germany.
(2017). Frequency distributions as faithfulness targets: Or, why Bulgarian feminized Turkish nouns. In Y. Oseki, M. Esipova, & S. Harves (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Meeting of Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wonnacott, E. & E. L. Newport. (2005). Novelty and regularization: The effect of novel instances on rule formation. In A. Brugos, M. R. Clark-Cotton, & S. Ha (Eds.), BUCLD 29: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zuraw, K. (2000). Patterned exceptions in phonology. PhD dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue