In:Historical Linguistics 2017: Selected papers from the 23rd International Conference on Historical Linguistics, San Antonio, Texas, 31 July – 4 August 2017
Edited by Bridget Drinka
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 350] 2020
► pp. 253–272
Old French si, grammaticalisation, and the interconnectedness of change
Published online: 9 July 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.350.12wol
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.350.12wol
Abstract
The particle SI is ubiquitous across the early French textual record, yet receives no uniform analysis,
with numerous competing and often contradictory claims in the literature about its distribution and formal status. This study draws on
a novel diachronic corpus analysis to put forward an original analysis of SI, under which it is not the homogeneous entity
often assumed but rather an adverbial which grammaticalises as a topic-continuity marker and, later, two forms of V2-related
expletive. SI loses its previously specific temporal and discourse-pragmatic meaning, shows a widening of distribution and
occupies an increasingly high position within the left periphery. In these respects it is shown to instantiate a classic form of
upwards grammaticalisation pathway.
Keywords: left periphery, Old French, V2, Topic, grammaticalisation, reanalysis, historical pragmatics
Article outline
- 1.Introduction and background
- 1.1Old French and syntactic change
- 1.2Background on Old French
- 2.Previous approaches to the syntax of si
- 3.A new approach
- 3.1Latin and the Strasbourg Oaths
- 3.2Evidence for diachronic change
- 4.Towards a grammaticalisation pathway for si
- 5.Consequences
Notes Abbreviations Bibliography
References (79)
Adams, M. (1987). From Old French to the Theory of Pro-Drop. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 5(1), 1–32.
Balon, L. & Larrivée, P. (2016). L‘ancien français n’est déjà plus une langue à sujet nul–nouveau témoignage des textes légaux. Journal of French Language Studies, 26(2), 221–237.
Bauer, B. (1995). The emergence and development of SVO patterning in Latin and French: diachronic and psycholinguistic perspectives. New York: OUP.
Benincà, P. (1995). Complement clitics in medieval Romance: The Tobler-Mussafia law. In I. Roberts & A. Battye (Eds.), Clause structure and language change. (pp. 325–344). Oxford: OUP.
(2006). A detailed map of the left periphery of medieval Romance. In: R. Zanuttini (Ed.). Crosslinguistic research in syntax and semantics: Negation, tense and clausal architecture. (pp. 53-86). Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
(2004). The left periphery of Medieval Romance. Studi Linguistici e Filologici Online, 2(2), 243–297.
Benincà, P. & Poletto, C. (2004). Topic, focus, and V2. In L. Rizzi (Ed.), The Structure of CP and IP (pp. 52–75). Oxford: OUP.
Cruschina, S. (2006). Information focus in Sicilian and the left periphery. In M. Frascarelli (Ed.), Phases of Interpretation (pp. 363–385). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cruschina, S. & Ledgeway, A. (2016). The Structure of the Clause. In A. Ledgeway & M. Maiden (Eds.), The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages. Oxford: OUP.
Danckaert, L. (2017). The development of Latin clause structure: a study of the extended verb phrase New York, NY: OUP.
Den Besten, H. (1983). On the Interaction of Root Transfomrations and Lexical Deletive Rules. In W. Abraham (Ed.), On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania (pp. 47–61). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Donaldson, B. (2012). Initial subordinate clauses in Old French: Syntactic variation and the clausal left periphery. Lingua, 122(9), 1021–1046.
Ferraresi, G. & Goldbach, M. (2002). V2 Syntax and Topicalization in Old French. Linguistiche Berichte, 189, 2–25.
(2003). Particles and sentence structure: a historical perspective. In Syntactic Structures and Morphological Information. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Fleischman, S. (1991). Discourse pragmatics and the grammar of Old French: A functional reinterpretation of ‘si’ and the personal
pronouns. Romance Philology, 44, 251–283.
(1992). Discourse and diachrony: The rise and fall of Old French SI. In M. Gerritsen & D. Stein (Eds.), Internal and External Factors in Syntactic Change (pp. 433–474). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2000). Methodologies and Ideologies in Historical Linguistics: On Working with Older Languages. In S. C. Herring, P. van Reenen, & L. Schøsler (Eds.), Textual parameters in older languages (pp. 33–58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Harris, M. (1976). A Typological Approach to Word-Order Change in French. In M. Harris (Ed.), Romance Syntax: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives (pp. 33–68). Salford: University of Salford.
Holmberg, A. (2015). Verb Second. In T. Kiss & A. Alexiadou (Eds.), Syntax – Theory and Analysis (pp. 242–283). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Klausenburger, J. (2000). Grammaticalization: Studies in Latin and Romance Morphosyntax. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Ledgeway, A. (In Press a). Second position elements and late Latin V2 syntax. In Rethinking Verb Second. Oxford: OUP.
(In Press b). The Verb Phrase. In G. Longobardi (Ed.), The Syntax of Italian. Cambridge: CUP.
(2011a). Grammaticalization from Latin to Romance. In : B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization. (pp. 719-728). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2011b). Syntactic and morphosyntactic typology and change in Latin and Romance. In M. Maiden, J. C. Smith, & A. Ledgeway (Eds.), The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages (pp. 382–471). Cambridge: CUP.
(2017). Late Latin Verb Second: The Sentential Word Order of the Itinerarium Egeriae. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, (Special Issue: Generative Approaches to Latin Syntax), 163–216.
Lemieux, M., & Dupuis, F. (1995). The Locus of Verb Movement in Non-Asymmetric Verb-Second Languages: The Case of Middle French. In I. Roberts & A. Battye (Eds.), Clause Structure and Language Change (pp. 80–110). Oxford: OUP.
Malkiel, Y. (1988). The Triple Janus Head of Romance Linguistics. Lecture delivered in October 1988 in the Senate House of the University of
Liverpool. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Marchello-Nizia, C. (1985). Dire le vrai : L’adverbe <<si>> en français médieval : Essai de linguistique historique. Geneva: Droz.
Mathieu, É. (2012). The left periphery in Old French. In D. Arteaga (Ed.), Research in Old French: The state of the art (pp. 327–350). Dordrecht: Springer.
Moignet, G. (1973). Grammaire de L’ancien français: morphologie – syntaxe. Paris: Éditions Klincksieck.
Öhl, P. (2010). Formal and functional constraints on constituent order and their universality. In C. Breul & E. Göbbel (Eds.), Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today (Vol. 165, pp. 231–276). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Prince, E. F. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 223–255). New York: Academic Press.
Reenen, P. van & Schøsler, L. (1992). Ancien et Moyen Français: SI ‘thématique’, analyse exhaustive d’une série de textes. Vox Romanica, 51, 101–127.
(1993). SI ‘thématique’, étude de SI en ancien et moyen français, discours direct”. In Actes du XXe Congrès International de Linguistique et Philologie Romanes (pp. 617–628). Zürich.
(2000). The pragmatic functions of the Old French particles ainz, apres, donc, lors, or, pluis, and si. In S. C. Herring, P. van Reenen & L. Schøsler (Eds.), Textual Parameters in Older Languages (pp. 59–105). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Roberts, I. (1993). Verbs and diachronic syntax: a comparative history of English and French. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
(2010). Grammaticalization, the clausal hierarchy and semantic bleaching. In E. C. Traugott & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Typological Studies in Language (Vol. 90, pp. 45–73). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2012). Diachrony and Cartography: Paths of Grammaticalization and the Clausal Hierarchy. In L. Brugé, A. Cardinaletti, G. Giusti, N. Munaro, & C. Poletto (Eds.), Functional Heads: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 7 (pp. 351–367). OUP.
Roberts, I. & Roussou, A. (2002). Syntactic change a minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.
Rouveret, A. (2004). Les clitiques pronominaux et la périphérie gauche en ancien français. Bulletin de La Société de Linguistique de Paris, 99, 181–237.
Salvesen, C. (Forthcoming). Resumptive Particles and Verb Second. R. Woods & S. Wolfe (Eds.), Rethinking Verb Second. Oxford: OUP.
(2013). Topics and the Left Periphery: A comparison of Old French and Modern Germanic. In T. Lohndal (Ed.), In search of universal grammar: from Old Norse to Zoque (pp. 131–172). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Salvi, G. (2004). La formazione della struttura di frase romanza: ordine delle parole e clitici dal latino alle lingue romanze
antiche. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Schøsler, L. & Reene, P. van. (1996). La fonction pragmatique des particules AINZ, APRES, DONC, LORS, OR, PUIS, SI en ancien français. In Actes du XIIIe Congrès des Romanistes Scandinaves (Vol. 2, pp. 635–658). Jyväskylä: Publications de l’Institut des Langues Romanes et Classiques.
Schwegler, A. (2013). Analyticity and Syntheticity, A Diachronic Perspective with Special Reference to Romance Languages (Reprint 2012). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Skårup, P. (1975). Les premières zones de la proposition en ancien français. København: Akademisk Forlag.
Skårup, P. (1975). Les premières zones de la proposition en ancien français. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.
Sornicola, R. (2011). Romance Linguistics and Historical Linguistics: Reflections on synchrony and diachrony. In M. Maiden, J. C. Smith, & A. Ledgeway (Eds.), The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages (pp. 1–49). Cambridge: CUP.
Steiner, B. D. (2014). The Role of Information Structure in the Loss of Verb-Second in the History of French (PhD Thesis). University of Indiana, Bloomington, Boston, Massachusetts.
Thurneysen, R. (1892). Die Stellung des Verbums in Altfranzösischen. Zeitschrift Für Romanische Philologie, 16, 289–307.
Vance, B. (1995). On the decline of verb movement to Comp in Old and Middle French. In A. Battye & I. Roberts (Eds.), Clause structure and language change. (pp. 173–199). Oxford: OUP.
Vance, B., Donaldson, B. & Steiner, B. D. (2009). V2 loss in Old French and Old Occitan: The role of fronted clauses. In S. Colina, A. Olarrea & A. M. Carvalho (Eds.), Romance Linguistics 2009. Selected papers from the 39th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Tuscon,
Arizona (pp. 301–320). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Vanelli, L., Renzi, L. & Benincà, P. (1986). Tipologia dei pronomi soggetto nelle lingue romanze medievali. Quaderni Patavini Di Linguistica, 5, 49–66.
Van Gelderen, E. (2008). Where did Late Merge go? Grammaticalization as feature economy. Studia Linguistica, 62(3), 287–300.
(2011). The Linguistic Cycle: Language Change and the Language Faculty: Language Change and the Language Faculty. OUP, USA.
Wolfe, S. (2015). Medieval Sardinian: New Evidence for Syntactic Change from Latin to Romance. In D. T. T. Haug (Ed.), Historical Linguistics 2013: Selected papers from the 21st International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Oslo, 5–9
August 2013 (pp. 303–324). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2016). A Comparative Perspective on the Evolution of Romance Clausal Structure. Diachronica, 33(4), 461–502.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
