Cover not available

In:Historical Linguistics 2017: Selected papers from the 23rd International Conference on Historical Linguistics, San Antonio, Texas, 31 July – 4 August 2017
Edited by Bridget Drinka
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 350] 2020
► pp. 29–48

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Criteria for subjecthood and non-canonical subjects in Classical Greek

 | Università per Stranieri di Siena
 | Università di Bologna
Published online: 9 July 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.350.02ben
Abstract
The dative-marked argument of the verb dokéō ‘seem’ in Classical Greek displays syntactic, semantic and pragmatic properties that qualify it as a non-canonical subject. To substantiate this claim, three phenomena are analyzed, all involving coreference resolution across clause boundaries: long-distance reflexivization, interclausal coreference, and case mismatch in participial constructions. For the latter phenomenon, the observed mismatch between case marking and referential properties is captured by positing the same coreference mechanism for finite clauses and for a class of participial constructions that qualify as a full clausal domain.
Article outline
  • 1.Non-canonical subjects in Classical Greek
  • 2.A case study: The dative argument of dokéō
  • 3.Reflexivization
  • 4.Interclausal coreference with finite clauses
  • 5.Interclausal coreference with participial clauses
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
References (56)
References
Aikhenvald, A. Y., Dixon, R. M. V. & Onishi, M. (2001). (Eds.), Non-canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andrews, A. (1976). The VP complement analysis in Modern Icelandic. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, 6, 1–21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ariel, M. (1988). Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics 24(1), 65–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Accessibility theory. An overview. In T. J. M. Sanders, J. Schilperoord, W. Spooren (Eds.), Text Representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects (pp. 29–87). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barðdal, J. & Eythórsson, Th. (2009). The origin of the oblique subject construction: an Indo-European comparison. In V. Bubenik, J. Hewson & S. Rose (Eds.), Grammatical Change in Indo-European Languages (pp. 179–193). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). What is a Subject: The Nature and Validity of Subject Tests. In J. Barðdal, N. Pat-El & S. M. Carey (Eds.), Non-Canonically Case-Marked Subjects. The Reykjavík-Eyjafjallajökull papers (pp. 257-274). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barðdal, J. & Smitherman, Th. (2013). The Quest for Cognates: A Reconstruction of Oblique Subject Constructions in Proto-Indo-European. Language Dynamics and Change, 3(1), 28–67.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barðdal, J., Smitherman, Th., Bjarnadóttir, V., Danesi, S., Jenset, G. B., McGillivray & B. (2012). Reconstructing constructional semantics. The dative subject construction in Old Norse-Icelandic, Latin, Ancient Greek, Old Russian and Old Lithuanian. Studies in Language, 36(3), 511–547. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bary, C. & Haug, D. T. T. (2011). Temporal anaphora across and inside sentences: The function of participles. Semantics and Pragmatics, 4, 1–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buijs, M. (2013). Participle. In G. K. Giannakis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics, Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conti, L. (2008). Synchronie und Diachronie des altgriechischen Genitivs als Semisubjekt. Historische Sprachforschung, 121, 94–113.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Weiteres zum Genitiv als Semisubjekt im Altgriechischen: Analyse des Kasus bei impersonalen Konstruktionen. Historische Sprachforschung, 122, 182–207.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cooper, G. L. (1988). Attic Greek Prose Syntax. 2 Volumes. After K. W. Krüger. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crespo, E., Conti, L., Maquieira, H. (2003). Sintaxis del Griego Clásico. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. (1990). Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahl, E. & Fedriani, C. (2012). The argument structure of experience: experiential constructions in Early Vedic, Homeric Greek and Early Latin. Transactions of the Philological Society, 110(3), 342–362. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Danesi, D., Johnson, C. A. & Barðdal, J. (2018). Where Does the Modality of Ancient Greek Modal Verbs Come From? The Relation between Modality and Oblique Case Marking. Journal of Greek Linguistics 18, 45–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dimitriadis, A. (1996). When Pro-Drop Languages Don’t. Overt Pronominal Subjects and Pragmatic Inference. In L. Dobrin, K. Singer & L. McNair (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society (pp. 33–47).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dryer, M. S. (1997). Are grammatical relations universal? In J. L. Bybee, J. Haiman, S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on Language Function and Language Type: Dedicated to T. Givón (pp. 115–143). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eythórsson, Th. & Barðdal, J. (2005). Oblique subjects: a common Germanic inheritance. Language 81, 824–881. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fedriani, C. (2009). The “Behaviour-Before-Coding” Principle: Further Evidence from Latin. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 94(2), 156–184.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Experiential Constructions in Latin. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frascarelli, M. (2007). Subjects, topics and the interpretation of referential pro: An interface approach to the linking of (null) pronouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25(4), 691–734. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In T. Givón (Ed.), Topic Continuity in Discourse. A quantitative cross-language study (pp. 1–41). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldstein, D. (2016). Classical Greek Syntax. Wackernagel’s Law in Herodotus. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haug, D. T. T. (2010). PROIEL Guidelines for Annotation. Ms., University of Oslo, [URL]
(2017). Backward control in Ancient Greek and Latin participial adjuncts. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 35(1), 99–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hock, H. H. (1990). Oblique subjects in Sanskrit? In M. K. Verma & K. P. Mohanan (Eds.), Experiencer Subjects in South Asian Languages (pp. 119–139). Stanford: CSLI Publication.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Humbert, J. (1960). Syntaxe grecque. 3rd. ed. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jøhndal, M. L. (2012). Non-finiteness in Latin. PhD Dissertation, Cambridge University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keenan, E. L. (1976). Towards a universal definition of “Subject of”. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and Topic (pp. 303–333). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keydana, G. (1997). Absolute Konstruktionen in altindogermanischen Sprachen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (2012). Greek Anaphora in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Journal of Greek Linguistics, 12, 84–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klaiman, M. H. (1980). Bengali Dative Subjects. Lingua 51(4), 275–295. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kühner, R. & Gerth, B. (1898; 1904). Ausführliche Grammatik der Griechischen Sprache3 , II-1; II–2. Hannover/Leipzig: Hannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Le Mair, E., Johnson, C. A., Frotscher, M., Eythórsson, Th. & Barðdal, J. (2017). Position as a behavioral property of subjects. The case of Old Irish. Indogermanische Forschungen 122(1), 111–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lühr, R. (2011). Zur Validität linguistischer Theorien in der Indogermanistik. In Th. Krisch, Th. Lindner (Eds.), Indogermanistik und Linguistik im Dialog. Akten der XIII. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft (pp. 321–330). Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luraghi, S. (2010). Experiencer predicates in Hittite. In R. I. Kim, E. Riecken, N. Oettinger & M. J. Weiss (Eds.), Ex Anatolia lux (pp. 249–264). Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Masica, C. P. (1976). Defining a Linguistic Area. South Asia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, I. (2007) (Ed.). Finiteness. Theoretical and Empirical Foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peels, S. (2007). ἑωυτόν as a long-distance anaphor in Herodotus’ histories. Master Thesis, Leiden University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petit, D. (1999). *Su̯e- en grec ancien : la famille du pronom réfléchi. Linguistique grecque et comparaison indo-européenne. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pieroni, S. (2007). Soggetto e riflessivo. In N. La Fauci & S. Pieroni (Eds.), Morfosintassi latina. Punti di vista (pp. 27–39). Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Powell, J. E. (1933). Studies on the Greek reflexive – Herodotus. The Classical Quarterly 27, 208–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1934). Studies on the Greek Reflexive – Thucydides. The Classical Quarterly 28, 159–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seržant, I. A. & Kulikov, L. (2013). (Eds.). The Diachronic Typology of Non-Canonical Subjects, Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sevdali, Ch. (2013). Case transmission beyond control and the role of Person. Journal of Historical Syntax, 24, 1–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siewierska, A. (2004). Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torregrossa, J., Bongartz, C. & Tsimpli, I. (2015). Testing accessibility: A cross-linguistic comparison of the syntax of referring expressions. Extended abstract for the Proceedings of the 89th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America , [URL]
Tronci, L. (2012). Sur le réfléchi en grec ancien: notes préliminaires. In Dupraz, E. (Ed.), Anaphore et anaphoriques: variété des langues, variété des emplois (pp. 151–166). Mont-Saint-Aignan: Publications des Universités de Rouen et du Havre.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M., Sorace, A., Heycock, C. & Filiaci, F. (2004). First language attrition and syntactic subjects: A study of Greek and Italian near-native speakers of English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8, 257–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verbeke, S., Kulikov, L. & Willems, K. (2015). Oblique case-marking in Indo-Aryan experiencer constructions: historical roots and synchronic variation. Lingua 163, 23–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Fabrizio, Claudia
2025. Alignment and Subjecthood in Latin, DOI logo
Benedetti, Marina & Chiara Gianollo
2023. Morphosyntactic Contact in Translation: Greek ídios and Latin proprius in the Bible. Transactions of the Philological Society 121:3 ► pp. 404 ff. DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix
2023. Support‐Verb Constructions with Objects:Greek‐CopticInterference in the Documentary Papyri?1. Transactions of the Philological Society 121:3 ► pp. 382 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue