In:Historical Linguistics 2015: Selected papers from the 22nd International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Naples, 27-31 July 2015
Edited by Michela Cennamo and Claudia Fabrizio
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 348] 2019
► pp. 423–442
Chapter 20A diachronic account of converbal constructions in Old Rajasthani
Published online: 10 September 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.348.20str
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.348.20str
Abstract
This paper presents the results of a multilayered diachronic analysis of one of the most important subordinating devices in IA, i.e. converbs. This is a corpus-oriented study based on an early variety of New Indo-Aryan, namely Old Rajasthani. We discuss: (a) the morphology of the converb and the possible pathways of its evolution through the centuries; (b) the syntactic properties of converbal chains, with a special focus on main argument marking and the ‘same-subject constraint’; and (c) the semantics of converbal constructions and the adverbial and clause-chaining properties of converbs. Our research has interesting implications for the aspectual status of the converb: aspect seems to be the most important factor determining the main argument marking in converbal chains.
Keywords: early New Indo-Aryan, Old Rajasthani, converb, historical morphosyntax
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Morphology of Old Rajasthani converbs
- 3.Syntactic dimensions of converbs in Old Rajasthani, with particular emphasis on the “same-subject constraint”
- 4.Semantics of converbs in Old Rajasthani
- 4.1Converbs in light verb constructions
- 4.2Converbs in clause chaining
- 5.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes Abbreviations References Primary sources
References (45)
Bickel, Balthasar & Yogendra P. Yadav. 2000. A fresh look at grammatical relations in Indo-Aryan. Lingua 110. 343–373.
Bickel, Balthasar. 1998. Review article of ‘Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective’. Linguistic Typology 2. 381–397.
Bisang, Walter. 1995. Verb serialization and converbs – differences and similarities. In Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, 137–188. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bloch, Jules. 1965. Indo-Aryan. From the Vedas to modern times. Paris: Librairie D’amerique Et D’orient Adrien – Maisonneuve.
Caldwell, Robert. 1875 A comparative grammar of the Dravidian or South-Indian family of languages. 2nd edition, revised and enlarged. London: Trübner & Co.
Chālise, Bidurkumar. 2006. Aitihāsika abhilekhakā ādhāramā nepālī bhāṣākā vyākaraṇa tatvamā kramika vikāsako adhyayana. [A study on the stadial development in the grammar of the Nepali language based on the historical inscriptions]. Unpublished PhD thesis. Kathmandu: Tribhuvan University.
Chatterji, Suniti Kumar. 1926. [1970] The Origin and Development of the Bengali Language. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Davison, Alice. 1981. Syntactic and semantic indeterminacy resolved: A mostly pragmatic analysis for the Hindi conjunctive participle. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 101–128. New York: Academic Press.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1995. The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. In Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, 1–56. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hook, Peter Edwin. 1991. The emergence of perfective aspect in Indo-Aryan languages. In: Elizabeth Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, 59–89. vol. 1. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
. 1993 Aspectogenesis and the compound verb in Indo-Aryan. In: Manindra K. Verma (ed.) Complex predicates in South Asian languages, 97–114New Delhi: Manohar.
Hutt, Michael. 1997. Modern literary Nepali. An introductory reader. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Jaworski, Rafał. 2015. IATagger. [URL]
Jha, Subhadra. 1958 [1985]. The Formation of the Maithili Language. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.
Johanson, Lars. 1992. Periodische Kettensätze im Türkischen. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes. 82. 201–211.
Kachru, Yamuna. 1981. On the syntax, semantics and pragmatics of the conjunctive participle in Hindi-Urdu. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 11:2. 35–49.
Khokhlova, Ludmila V. 1992. Trends in the development of ergativity in New Indo-Aryan. Osmania Papers in Linguistics 18. 71–89.
1995. The Development of patient-oriented constructions in late Western NIA Languages. Osmania Papers in Linguistics 21, 15–51.
2006. Sintaktičeskaja evolucija zapadnych novoindijskich jazykov v 15–20 vv. [Syntactic evolution of Western New Indo-Aryan languages in 15–20 c.]. In: Dybo et al.. (eds.), Aspekty komparativistiki [Aspects of comparative studies], 151–186. Moskva: Rosijskij Gosudarstvennyj Gumanitarnyj Universitet (Orientalia et Classica: Trudy Instituta Vostočnych Kultur i Antičnosti: Vypusk VIII).
Oberlies, Thomas. 2005. A Historical Grammar of Hindi. Grazer Vergleichende Arbeiten, Band 19. Graz: Leykam.
Ramstedt, Gustav John (1903): Über die Konjugation des Khalkha-Mongolischen. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
Reinöhl, Uta. 2016. A single origin of Indo-European primary adpositions? Unveiling the Indo-Aryan branch-off. Diachronica 33. 95–130.
Slade, Benjamin. 2013. The diachrony of light and auxiliary verbs in Indo-Aryan. Diachronica 30(4): 531–578.
Stroński, Krzysztof. 2009. On the origin of the ergative postposition in Hindi. Rocznik Orientalistyczny LXII/1: 175–186.
. 2011. Synchronic and diachronic aspects of ergativity in Indo-Aryan. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
Stroński, Krzysztof & Tokaj, Joanna. 2015. The diachrony of cosubordination – lessons from Indo-Aryan. Paper presented at the 31st South Asian Languages Analysis Roundtable (SALA-31), Lancaster 14–16 May 2015. Extended abstract available at: [URL].
Subbarao, Kurumuri V. 2012. South Asian languages: A syntactic typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tessitori, Luigi P. 1914–16. Notes on the Grammar of the Old Western Rajasthani with Special Reference to Apabhramsa and to Gujarati and Marwari. Indian Antiquary 43:5.
Tikkanen, Bertil. 1987. The Sanskrit Gerund: A Synchronic. Diachronic and Typological Analysis, Studia Orientalia, 62, Helsinki.
. 1995. Burushaski converbs in their South and Central Asian areal context. In Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, 487–528. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Verbeke, Saartje. 2013. Alignment and ergativity in the New Indo-Aryan languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Kukana, Poonam, Pooja Sharma & Neeru Bhardwaj
Stroński, Krzysztof & Leonid Kulikov
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
