Cover not available

In:Historical Linguistics 2015: Selected papers from the 22nd International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Naples, 27-31 July 2015
Edited by Michela Cennamo and Claudia Fabrizio
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 348] 2019
► pp. 171–184

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 9
Anti-relevant, contra-iconic but system-adequate

On unexpected inflectional changes

 | University of Turin
Published online: 10 September 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.348.09gae
Abstract
Several universal principles have been suggested that are supposed to limit the possible shape of inflectional systems, such as the Principle of Iconicity and the Principle of Relevance. The paper presents two case-studies which clearly falsify the expectations arising from these two principles and cry for an explanation. This has to be sought in a conflict between general principles limiting the universal degree of variation tolerated by inflectional systems and System Adequacy, namely the tendency of an inflectional system of improving its internal consistency. The result is a more economic, i.e. less costly, representation of morphological information, at the expense of the violation of the universal principles caused by contra-iconic and anti-relevant coding strategies.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Against iconicity
  • 3.Against relevance
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
References (34)
References
Andersen, Henning. 2010. From Morphologization to Demorphologization. In Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds.), The Continuum Companion to Historical Linguistics, 117-146. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baerman, Matthew, Dunstan Brown & Greville G. Corbett. 2005. The syntax-morphology interface: a study of syncretism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barbiers, Sjef. 2013. Microsyntactic variation. In Marcel den Dikken (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax, 899–926. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 1996. Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In Booij & van Marle (eds.), 1–16.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, Geert, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds.). 2000. Morphology. An International Handbook on Inflection und Word-Formation. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, Geert & Jaap van Marle (eds.). 1996. Yearbook of Morphology 1995. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Wilde-van Buul, G. 1943. Het enclitisch pronomen personale van de tweede en derde persoon singularis in het Rotterdams. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 62. 290–301.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. 2000a. Naturalness. In Booij, Lehmann & Mugdan (eds.), vol. 1, 288–296.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000b. Subtraction. In Booij, Lehmann & Mugdan (eds.), vol. 1, 581–587.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. Naturalness and morphological change. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 461–471. Oxford: Blackwell.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gaeta, Livio. 2016. Co-opting exaptation in a theory of language change. In Muriel Norde & Freek Van de Velde (eds.), Exaptation in language change, 57–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Golston, Chris & Richard Wiese. 1996. Zero morphology and constraint interaction: subtraction and epenthesis in German dialects. In Booij & van Marle (eds.), 143–159.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goossens, Jan & J. Verheyden. 1970. De preteritum-vormen van de zwakke werkwoorden in het zuiden van het Nederlandse taalgebied. In P. J. Meertens (ed.), Zijn akker is de taal, 133–147. The Hague: Daamen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1969. Some methods of dynamic comparison in linguistics. In Jaan Puhvel (ed.), Substance and Structure of Language, 137–203. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. The diachronic externalization of inflection. Linguistics 31. 279–309.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42. 25–70.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. On system pressure competing with economic motivation. In Brian MacWhinney, Andrej L. Malchukov, & Edith A. Moravcsik (eds.), Competing motivations, 197–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1974. Isomorphismus in sprachlichen Zeiten. In Hansjakob Seiler (ed.), Linguistic Workshop II, 98–123. München: Fink.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lurati, Ottavio. 2002. La Lombardia. In Manlio Cortelazzo, Carla Marcato, Nicola De Blasi & Gianrenzo P. Clivio (eds.), I dialetti italiani. Storia, struttura, uso, 226–260. Torino: UTET.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 1998. Towards an explanation of some morphological changes which ‘should never have happened’. In Monika S. Schmid, Jennifer R. Austin & Dieter Stein (eds.), Historical Linguistics 1997. Selected papers from the 13th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Düsseldorf, 10–17 August, 241–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Massariello Merzagora, Giovanna. 1988. Lombardia. [Profilo dei dialetti italiani 3.] Pisa: Pacini.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plank, Frans. 2009. The Universals Archive. University of Konstanz. URL: [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reker, Siemon. 1988. Een zwakke verledentijdsvorming in het Gronings morfonologisch beschouwd. In A. Goeman, G. de Schutter & J. Taeldeman (eds.), Morfologie. Special issue of Taal en tongval, 54–67. Amsterdam: Meertens-Instituut voor Dialectologie.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1968. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roos, Nieke. 2009. The weak past tense in Dutch and Low German. PhD Diss. Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ryckeboer, Hugo. 1973. Het preteritumsuffix bij zwakke werkwoorden in Frans-Vlaanderen. In Libera Carlier & Jo Daan (Album Willem Pée, 293–300. Tongeren: Michiels.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salvioni, Carlo. 1975. Fonetica e morfologia del dialetto milanese. L’Italia Dialettale 38. 1–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schirmunski, Victor M. 1962. Deutsche Mundartkunde. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taeldeman, Johan. 2011. De vorming van het ‘zwakke’ preteritum in de zuidelijke Nederlandse dialecten: een tentatieve benadering van twee aspecten. Verslagen & Mededelingen van de Koninklijke Academie voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 121.183–204.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Loon, Jozef. 2005. Principles of Historical Morphology. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weijnen, A. 1958. Nederlandse dialectkunde. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang U. 1984. Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1987. System-dependent morphological naturalness in inflection. In Wolfgang U. Dressler, Willi Mayerthaler, Oskar Panagl & Wolfgang U. Wurzel (eds.), Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology, 59–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue