In:Norms and Conventions in the History of English
Edited by Birte Bös and Claudia Claridge
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 347] 2019
► pp. 49–72
Paradigm shifts in 19th-century British grammar writing
A network of texts and authors
Published online: 27 May 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.347.04bus
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.347.04bus
Abstract
Systematic and comprehensive linguistic studies of 19th-century British grammar books are scarce. This is surprising since the 19th century has often been claimed to constitute a turning point in English grammar writing, particularly due to the assumed paradigm shift from prescriptive works to predominantly descriptive grammars, the emergence of the comparative-historical approach around 1830, and phonetics gaining importance in the 1890s.
Combining methods from network analysis and historical corpus linguistics, we aim to reassess these assumed (meta)linguistic developments in grammar writing by examining authors’ references to other grammarians in a corpus of 19th-century British grammars. We will show that changes, such as the turn away from prescriptive grammar writing, can indeed be further enhanced and systematically supported by quantitative results from the analysed network of referenced grammars and grammarians. Further, the analysis of the grammars’ lexical inventory shows which authors take the lead in terminological progress.
Keywords: grammar writing, network analysis, corpus linguistics, 19th century
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: 19th-century grammar writing
- 2.The corpus and methodology
- 3.Results of network and frequency analysis
- 3.1Most frequently referenced grammarians
- 3.2Most frequently referencing grammar authors
- 3.3Network of grammarians’ references
- 3.4Distribution of linguistic keywords in the grammar corpus
- 3.4.1Comparative and historical
- 3.4.2Phonetic(s)/phonology
- 3.4.3Prescriptive/prescription and descriptive
- 4.Summary and conclusion
Notes References Corpus of 19th-century grammar books Other grammar books Appendix
References (68)
Anderwald, Lieselotte. (2016). Language Between Description and Prescription: Verbs and Verb Categories in Nineteenth-Century Grammars of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Auer, Anita. (2008). Eighteenth-century grammars and book catalogues. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (Ed.), Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar Writing in Eighteenth-Century England (57–75). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bussmann, Hadumod. (1998). Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics. Translated and edited by George P. Trauth and Kerstin Kazzazi. London and New York: Routledge.
Chapman, Don. (2008). The eighteenth-century grammarians as language experts. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (Ed.), Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar Writing in Eighteenth-Century England (21–36). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dekeyser, Xavier. (1975). Number and Case Relations in 19th Century British English: A Comparative Study of Grammar and Usage. Bibliotheca Linguistica. Antwerpen et al.: De Nederlandsche Boekhandel.
Finegan, Edward. (1998). English Grammar and Usage. In Suzanne Romaine (Ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language Vol. IV: 1776–1997. (536–588). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Görlach, Manfred. (1998). An Annotated Bibliography of Nineteenth-Century Grammars of English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hickey, Raymond (Ed.). (2010). Eighteenth-Century English. Ideology and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Howatt, Anthony P. R. (1984). A History of English Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Linn, Andrew. (2006). English grammar writing. In Bas Aarts, April McMahon (Eds.), Handbook of English Linguistics (72–92). Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
MacMahon, Michael K. C. (1998). Phonology. In Suzanne Romaine (Ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language Vol. IV: 1776–1997 (373–535). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McGlashan, Mark. (2015). #CL2015 social media roundup: Using Corpus Linguistics to investigate Corpus Linguists talking about Corpus Linguistics. ESRC Centre for Corpus Approaches to Social Science (CASS). Retrieved from [URL]
Onions, Charles Talbut. (1921). Henry Sweet. In Dictionary of National Biography (519). London: Oxford University Press.
Oxford English Dictionary (OED) Online. December 2016. Oxford University Press. [URL]
Prell, Christina. (2012). Social Network Analysis. History, Theory & Methodology. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Stuart, Keith, & Botella, Ana. (2009). Corpus Linguistics, Network Analysis and Co-occurrence Matrices. In Universidad de Murcia. International Journal of English Studies (Special Issue, 1–28).
Alexander, Levy. (1833). The Young Lady and Gentleman’s Guide to the Grammar of the English Language in Verse. London.
Crane, George. (1843). The Principles of Language; Exemplified in a Practical English Grammar. London.
Crombie, Alexander. (1802). The Etymology and Syntax of the English Language, Explained and Illustrated. London.
Lennie, William. (1810). The principles of English grammar briefly defined, and neatly arranged. Edinburgh.
Mason, Charles Peter. (1858). English Grammar; including the Principles of Grammatical Analysis. London.
Morell, John Daniel. (1852). The analysis of sentences explained and systematised: with an exposition of the fundamental laws of syntax. After the plan of Becker’s German grammar. London.
Simmonite, Wiliam Joseph. (1841). The Practical Self-teaching Grammar of the English Language. London.
Sweet, Henry. (1892/1898). A New English Grammar: logical and historical. 2 Vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Nurmi, Arja
WIEMANN, MARCO
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
