In:Developments in English Historical Morpho-Syntax
Edited by Claudia Claridge and Birte Bös
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 346] 2019
► pp. 287–308
The rivalry between far from being + predicative item and its counterpart omitting the copula in Modern English
Published online: 27 May 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.346.14vos
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.346.14vos
Abstract
Distinguishing between several subtypes of the frame far from + optional and recessive being + predicative phrase, this paper charts the evolution of the rivalling variants in British and American English over the last few centuries. The paper reports on two major findings. First, in line with the Complexity Principle, there is a tendency for more complex predicatives to help preserve the more explicit being variant better than simpler ones. In particular, morphologically complex adjectives and syntactically complex noun phrases in the predicative slot are shown to retain the being variant longer than less complex ones. Second, as regards the establishment of the less explicit zero variant, the relation between British and American English corresponds to the so-called lag and overtake scenario. While initially trailing behind British English, American English has - in more recent times - adopted the zero variant much faster than British English.
Article outline
- 1.Setting the scene
- 2.Historical developments
- 2.1Clausal type A involving adjectives in the narrative database and the OED
- 2.2Other environments
- 3.Complexity constraints
- 3.1Cognitive accessibility
- 3.2The relevance of morphologically-based categories
- 3.3Syntactic constraints in the language of present-day British newspapers
- 4.Comparing British and American English
- 4.1Historical contrasts: The lag and overtake scenario
- 4.2Some remaining contrasts: The present-day situation as reflected in large collections of British and American newspapers
- 5.Conclusion
Notes References
References (46)
Huddleston, Rodney, & Pullum, Geoffrey K. (2008). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hundt, Marianne (2009). Colonial lag, colonial innovation or simply language change? In Günter Rohdenburg, & Julia Schlüter (Eds.), One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English (13–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mondorf, Britta (2009). More Support for More-Support: The Role of Processing Constraints on the Choice between Synthetic and Analytic Comparative Forms. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Rohdenburg, Günter (1996). Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Lingustics 7, 149–182.
(2013). Using the OED quotations database as a diachronic corpus. In Manfred Krug, & Julia Schlüter (Eds.), Research Methods in Language Variation and Change (136–157). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2014). Syntactic constraints on the use of dual form intensifiers in Modern English. In Kristin Davidse, Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquiere, & Lieven Vandelanotte (Eds.), Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns (131–149). Amsterdam/New York: John Benjamins.
(2019). Further explorations in the grammar of intensifier marking in Modern English. In Claudia Claridge & Birte Bös (Eds.), Developments in English Historical Morpho-Syntax (269-285). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Rohdenburg Günter (2016). Testing two processing principles with respect to the extraction of elements out of complement clauses. English Language and Linguistics, 463–486.
Rohdenburg, Günter, & Schlüter, Julia (2000). Determinanten grammatischer Variation im Früh- und Spätneuenglischen. Sprachwissenschaft 4(25), 443–496.
(2009). New departures. In Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (Eds.), One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English (364–423). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schlüter, Julia (2005). Rhythmic Grammar: The Influence of Rhythm on Grammatical Variation and Change in English. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Vosberg, Uwe (2006). Die große Komplementverschiebung. Außersemantische Einflüsse auf die Entwicklung satzwertiger Ergänzungen im Neuenglischen. Tübingen: Narr.
Electronic corpora
BNC British National Corpus (1995). Version 1.0. BNC Consortium/Oxford University Computing Services. (100,000,000 words)
d91-00, 02, 04–05 Daily Telegraph and Sunday Telegraph on CD-ROM (1991–2000), (2002), (2004–5). Chadwyck-Healey/ProQuest. (478,837,273 words)
D92-95 Detroit Free Press on CD-ROM (1992–1995). Knight Ridder Information Inc. (102,989,512 words)
EAF Early American Fiction (2000). Chadwyck-Healey. (34,634,666 words)
EAF1 First part of EAF containing only those authors born in the eighteenth century (* 1744-*1799). (15,891,451 words)
EAF2 Second part of the EAF containing only those authors born in the nineteenth century (*1801-*1827). (18,743,215 words)
ECF Eighteenth-Century Fiction (1996). Chadwyck-Healey. (9,702,696 words, omitting duplicates)
EEPF Early English Prose Fiction (1997-2000). Chadwyck-Healey. In association with the Salzburg Centre for Research on the English Novel SCREEN. (9,562,865 words)
EPD English Prose Drama (1996-1997). Chadwyck-Healey. (26,454,639 words)
ETC Early Twentieth Century Corpus – a selection of British and American writings by authors born between 1870 and 1894. Source: Project Gutenberg. Compiled in the Research Project 'Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English', University of Paderborn (16,351,681 words)
ETC/A American writings in the ETC. (11,550,273 words)
ETC/B British writings in the ETC. (4,801,408 words)
g90-05 Guardian (including The Observer 1994–2005) on CD-ROM (1990–2005). Chadwyck-Healey/ProQuest. (645,817,821 words)
i93-94, 02–05 Independent and Independent on Sunday on CD-ROM (1993–94), (2002–5). ProQuest. (242,608,117 words)
L92-95 Los Angeles Times on CD-ROM (1992–5) Knight Ridder Information Inc. (320,016,164 words)
L96-99 Los Angeles Times (1996–9) (courtesy of The Los Angeles Times Editorial Library). (275,506,490 words)
LNC Late-Nineteenth-Century Corpus – a selection of British and American writings (complementary to the EAF and NCF) by authors born between 1830 and 1869. Source: Project Gutenberg. Compiled in the Research Project 'Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English', University of Paderborn. (47,677,728 words)
LNC/A American writings in the LNC. (26,859,926 words)
LNC/B British writings in the LNC. (20,817,802 words)
m93-00 Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday on CD-ROM (1993–2000). Chadwyck-Healey. (206,762,410 words)
MNC Mid-Nineteenth-Century Corpus – a selection of British and American writings (complementary to the EAF and the NCF) by authors born between 1803 and 1829. Source: Project Gutenberg. Compiled in the Research Project 'Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English', University of Paderborn. (17,347,730 words)
MNC/A American writings in the MNC. (7,264,854 words)
MNC/B British writings in the MNC. (10,082,876 words)
N01 New York Times on CD-ROM (2001). ProQuest. (52,132,979 words)
NCF Nineteenth-Century Fiction (1999-2000). Chadwyck-Healey. (37,589,837 words)
NCF1 First part of the NCF containing only those authors born in the eighteenth century (*1728-*1799). (11,373,834 words)
NCF2 Second part of the NCF containing only those authors born in the nineteenth century (*1800-*1869). (26,041,862 words)
OED The Oxford English Dictionary (Second Edition) on CD-ROM (1992) (Version 1.10). Edited by John A. Simpson and Edmund S. C. Weiner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
t90-04 The Times and The Sunday Times on CD-ROM (1990-2004). Chadwyck-Healey/ProQuest. (729,848,339 words)
TAL89-94 Time Magazine on CD-ROM (1989–1994). (12,123,886 words)
W90-92 Washington Times (including Insight on the News 1990–1992) on CD-ROM (1990–1992). Wayzata Technology. (93,889,488 words)
wridom1 imaginative component of the BNC (=narrative fiction). (18,863,529 words)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Mondorf, Britta
Vosberg, Uwe
Rohdenburg, Günter
2019. Further explorations in the grammar of intensifier marking in Modern English. In Developments in English Historical Morpho-syntax [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 346], ► pp. 269 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
