In:Developments in English Historical Morpho-Syntax
Edited by Claudia Claridge and Birte Bös
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 346] 2019
► pp. 175–198
Conservatism or the influence of the semantics of motion situation in the choice of perfect auxiliaries in Jane Austen’s letters and novels
Published online: 27 May 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.346.09cor
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.346.09cor
Abstract
The present study focuses on the analysis of the choice of either be or have in combination with the past participles of eleven motion verbs (arrive, become, come, enter, fall, go, get, grow, pass, return and run) to form perfective structures in Jane Austen’s letters and novels. She has previously been considered conservative in her grammar, specifically in relation to her preference for be as opposed to have in this type of structure. A corpus-based study shows that although she could indeed be considered conservative, the option of the auxiliary might also have been motivated by the different components of the motion situation involved in each instance. The conclusions show that some tendencies can be observed in relation to the behaviour of some of these verbs, despite the low number of occurrences of some of the verbs included in the analysis.
Keywords: perfect, auxiliary, motion verbs, cognitive approach, stylistics
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Previous studies
- 1.2The present study
- 1.3Basic motion situation
- 1.4Hypotheses
- 2.Method
- 3.Results
- 3.1Motion situations in Jane Austen's letters
- 3.2Motion situations in Jane Austen’s novels
- 4.Letters versus novels
- 5.Conclusion
Notes References Appendix
References (33)
Anderwald, Lieselotte (2014). The Decline of the Be-perfect, Linguistic Relativity, and Grammar Writing in the Nineteenth Century. In Marianne Hundt (Ed.), Late Modern English Syntax (13–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Austen, Jane (2010). The Complete Works of Jane Austen. Ed. by David Widger. Project Gutenberg. Retrieved from [URL].
Barber Charles, Beal, Joan C., & Shaw, Philip A. (2011). The English Language. A Historical Introduction. (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cederlöf, M. (1985). Be and Have as Perfect Auxiliaries with Mutative Verbs in Some Novels by Jane Austen, Charles Dickens and George Eliot. University of Stockholm (mimeographed).
Chapman, Robert W. (1952).
Jane Austen’s Letters To Her Sister Cassandra and Others, 1796–1817, 2nd ed. London: Oxford University.
Corry, Pearl (2014, January, 10). The Education of Jane and Cassandra. Retrieved from: [URL]
(1998). Syntax. In Suzanne Romaine (Ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, (Vol. 4, 1776–1997, 92–329). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grant, T (2010, September, 20). Jane Austen Went to School. Retrieved from: [URL]
Kytö, Merja (1997). Be/have + past participle: The choice of the auxiliary with intransitives from Late Middle to Modern English. In Matti Rissanen, Merja Kytö, & Kirsi Heikkonen (Eds.), English in transition: Corpus-based studies in Linguistic Variation and Genre Styles (17–84). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Le Faye, Deirdre (1997). Chronology of Jane Austen’s life. In Edward Copeland, & Juliet McMaster (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Jane Austen (1–11). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Matsumoto, Yo (1996). Subjective motion and English and Japanese verbs, Cognitive Linguistics 7, 138–226.
McCafferty, Kevin (2014) ‘[W]ell, are you not got over thinking about going to Ireland yet’: the Be-perfect in Eighteenth and Nineteenth century Irish English. In Marianne Hundt (Ed.), Late Modern English Syntax (13–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, & Svartvik, Jan (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Ramscar, Michael, Matlock, Teenie, & Boroditsky, Lera (2009). Time, motion and meaning: the experiential basis of abstract thought. In Kelly S. Mix, Linda B. Smith, & Michael Gasser (Eds.), The Spatial Foundations of Language and Cognition (67–82). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rydén, Mats, & Brorstöm, Sverker (1987). The Be/Have Variation with Intransitives in English. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
Singh, A (2010, October, 22). Jane Austen’s famous prose may not be hers after all. Retrieved from: [URL]
Slobin, Dan I. (1996). Two ways to travel: Verbs of Motion in English and Spanish. In Masayoshi Shibatani, & Sandra A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical Constructions (195–219). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sutherland, Kathryn (2012). Jane Austen’s dealings with John Murray and his firm, RES The Review of English Studies 64(263), 105–126.
Talmy, Leonard (1975). Semantics and Syntax of motion. In John P. Kimbali (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics (Vol. 4, 181–238). Nueva York: Academic Press.
(1987). Lexicalization Patterns: Semantic Structure in Lexical Forms. In Timothy Shopen (Ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description (57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid (2009). An Introduction to Late Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
Visser, Fredericus Th., (1973).
An Historical Syntax of the English Language. I-III. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
Warren, Renee (2018, April, 10). Jane Austen Life Timeline. Retrieved from: [URL]
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Calvo Cortés, Nuria
2020. Women writers in the 18th century. In Late Modern English [Studies in Language Companion Series, 214], ► pp. 203 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
