In:Developments in English Historical Morpho-Syntax
Edited by Claudia Claridge and Birte Bös
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 346] 2019
► pp. 57–76
‘Thone vpon thother’
On pronouns one and other with initial th- and t- in Middle English
Published online: 27 May 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.346.04nyk
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.346.04nyk
Abstract
A frequent result produced by a search of the digital corpora of Middle English (henceforth ME) for instances of reduced th’ is a nominal involving the pronouns one or other with initial th- or t- attached. In this study I argue that two different mechanisms, that is reduction of the definite article and misanalysis of the preceding demonstrative, need to be taken into account when scrutinizing the emergence of what turns out to be four different pronouns, namely thone, thother, tone, and tother. First I flesh out the ways in which these pronouns were used in ME. Then I analyze textual evidence which sheds light on the question when and how these pronouns emerged. Finally I argue that while initial th- is always a definite determiner reduced as expected given the DP cycle, initial t- can be either a definite determiner or, less likely, part of a lexicalized pronoun.
Keywords: pronoun, determiner, Middle English, definiteness, DP cycle
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Setting the stage – The DP cycle and double articulation of definiteness
- 3.The pronouns tone/thone and tother/thother in ME
- 4.The origins of tone/thone and tother/thother
- 5.A correlation between reduced th’ and development of tone/thone and tother/thother
- 6.Toward an account of thone/thother and tone/tother
- 7.Conclusion
Notes Sources References
References (35)
Corpus of Middle English Prose and Verse, (CMEPV). (1997–). Developed by the Humanities Text Initiative. [URL] (11 October, 2018).
Kroch, Anthony & Taylor Ann (2000). The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English (PPCME2). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, second edition, release 4 ([URL])
Abney, Stephen P. (1987). The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
Anderson, John, & Britton, Derek (1999). The Orthography and Phonology of the Ormulum. English Language and Linguistics 3(2), 299–334.
Barry, Michael (1972). The Morphemic Distribution of the Definite Article in Contemporary Regional English. In Martyn F. Wakelin (Ed.), Patterns in the Folkspeech in the British Isles (164–181). London: Athlone.
Branco, António, & Costa, Francisco (2006). Noun Ellipsis without Empty Categories. In Stefan Müller (Ed.), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Varna (81–101). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Brinton, Laurel J., & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (2005). Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Déchaine Rose-Marie, & Wiltschko, Martina (2002). Decomposing Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 33(3), 409–442.
Diessel, Holger (1999). Demonstratives. Form, Function, and Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dobson, Eric J. (1972). Introduction. In Eric J. Dobson (Ed.), The English Text of the Ancrene Riwle edited from B.M. Cotton ms. Cleopatra C vi. EETS O.S. 267 (ivclxxiii). London: Oxford University Press.
van Gelderen, Elly (2011). The Linguistic Cycle: Language Change and the Language Faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Greenberg, Joseph H. (1978). How Does a Language Acquire Gender Markers? In Joseph H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of Human Language (Vol. 3, 47–82). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Greenberg, Joseph H. (1991). The Last Stages of Grammatical Elements: Contractive and Expansive Desemanticization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott, & Bernd Heine (Eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization. Vol 1 (Vol. I, 301–314). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Huddleston, Rodney, & Pullum, Geoffrey K. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jones, Mark J. (2002). The Origin of Definite Article Reduction in Northern English Dialects: Evidence from Dialect Allomorphy. English Language and Linguistics 6, 325–345.
Julien, Marit (2005). Nominal Phrases from a Scandinavian Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lehmann, Christian (2015). Thoughts on Grammaticalization. 3rd Edition. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Lobeck, A. (1995). Ellipsis - Functional Heads, Licensing, and Identification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lohrmann, Susanne (2011). A Unified Structure for Scandinavian DPs. In Petra Sleeman, & Harry Perridon (Eds.), The Noun Phrase in Romance and Germanic. Structure, Variation, and Change (111–125). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Middle English Dictionary (MED). (1956–2001). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. [URL] (9 October, 2018).
Nerbonne, John, & Mullen, Tony (1999). Null-headed nominals in German and English. In Ineke Schuurman, Frank van Eynde, & Ness Schelkens (Eds.), Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands 1998 (143–164). Amsterdam-Atlanta (GA): Rodopi.
Nykiel, Jerzy (2015). The Reduced Definite Article th’ in Late Middle English and Beyond: an Insight from the Definiteness Cycle. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 27(2), 105–144.
(2016). Non-anaphoric use of reduced th’ in the 15th century. Paper presented at XXVII SELIM, Granada, Spain.
Onions, C. T. (Ed.). (1966). The Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
Oxford English Dictionary (OED). (1933). Oxford: Oxford University Press, and OED online.
Plank, Frans (2003). Double Articulation. In Frans Plank (Ed.), Noun Phrase Structure in the Languages of Europe (337–395). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, & Svartvik, Jan (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London-New York: Longman Inc.
Salmon, Vivian (1999). Orthography and Punctuation. In Roger Lass (Ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language. Volume III, 1476–1776 (13–56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schoorlemmer, Erik (2012). Definiteness Marking in Germanic: Morphological Variations on the Same Syntactic Theme. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 15, 107–156.
