Cover not available

In:Perspectives on Language Structure and Language Change: Studies in honor of Henning Andersen
Edited by Lars Heltoft, Iván Igartua, Brian D. Joseph, Kirsten Jeppesen Kragh and Lene Schøsler
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 345] 2019
► pp. 295–309

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Morphosyntactic reanalysis in Australian languages

Three studies

 | Canberra, AustraliaAustralian National University, Canberra, Australia
Published online: 18 June 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.345.13koc
Abstract
This paper discusses three examples of reanalysis in the Pama-Nyungan languages of Australia, affecting word, clause, and sentence level constructions respectively. The elimination of a morpheme boundary, with absorption of an erstwhile suffix into the nominal stem, in Western Desert dialects revisits and amplifies earlier discussion from Koch (1995), canvassing various motivations and finding supporting data more recent data from Langlois (2004). Secondly, the gradual implementation of the effects of a change from ergative to accusative alignment in Panyjima, as established by Dench (1982), are explored within Andersen’s framework of actualisation. The third study shows, on the basis of the etymology of formal markers, how, in the Arandic languages, biclausal structures have developed via auxiliarisation into inflectional markers of imperfective aspect, but also into a set of inflections realising contrasting values within a new morphosyntactic category of “associated motion”. This section articulates the diachronic developments behind the synchronic system, building on earlier suggestions by Koch (1984) and Wilkins (1991).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction and overview
  • 2.Boundary loss with creation of morphological zero
  • 3.Reanalysis of alignment: Ergative to accusative
  • 4.Clause fusion to auxiliary constructions and inflections marking Associated Motion
  • 5.Summary and conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (34)
References
Andersen, Henning. 2001a. Actualization and the (uni)directionality of change. In Henning Andersen (ed.), Actualization: Linguistic change in progress, 225–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (ed.) 2001b. Actualization: Linguistic change in progress. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 219). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1977. On mechanisms by which languages become ergative. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change, 317–363. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, Peter. 1989. Verb compounding in Central Australian languages. La Trobe Working Papers in Linguistics 2. 43–71.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Crow is sitting chasing them: Grammaticalisation and the verb to sit in the Mantharta languages, Western Australia. In Anna Siewierska & Jae Jung Song (eds.), Case, typology and grammar: In honor of Barry J. Blake, 19–36 (Typological Studies in Language 38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blake, Barry J. 1977. Case marking in Australian languages. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowe, Heather J. 1990. Categories, constituents, and constituent order in Pitjantjatjara: An Aboriginal language of Australia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bubenik, Vit. 2001. On the actualization of the passive-to-ergative shift in Pre-Islamic India. In Henning Andersen (ed.), Actualization: Linguistic change in progress, 95–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dench, Alan. 1982. The development of an accusative case marking pattern in the Ngayarda languages of Western Australia. Australian Journal of Linguistics 2. 43–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. Panyjima. In R. M. W. Dixon & Barry J. Blake (eds.), Handbook of Australian languages, Volume 4: The Aboriginal language of Melbourne and other grammatical sketches, 124–243. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Demonstrative paradigm splitting in the Pilbara languages. In Joseph C. Salmons & Shannon Dubenion-Smith (eds.), Historical linguistics 2005: Selected papers from the 17th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Madison, Wisconsin, 31 July – 5 August 2005, 223–237. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2002. The Australian languages: Their nature and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guillaume, Antoine. 2016. Associated motion in South America: Typological and areal perspectives. Linguistic Typology 20(1). 81–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guillaume, Antoine and Harold Koch (eds.) Forthcoming. Associated Motion. (Empirical Approaches to Linguistic Typology), Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Hale, Kenneth. 1973. Deep-surface canonical disparities in relation to analysis and change. In T. A. Sebeok (ed.), Current trends in linguistics, Volume 11: Diachronic, areal, and typological linguistics, 401–458. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C., & Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective, (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 74). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klokeid, Terry J. 1978. Nominal inflection in Pama-Nyungan: a case study in relational grammar. In Werner Abraham (ed.), Valence, semantic case, and grammatical relations, 577–615. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koch, Harold. 1984. The category of ‘associated motion’ in Kaytej. Language in Central Australia 1. 23–34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. The creation of morphological zeroes. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1994, 31–71. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Morphological reconstruction as an etymological method. In Barry J. Blake & Kate Burridge (eds.), Historical linguistics 2001: Selected papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Melbourne, 13-17 August 2001, 271–291. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. The Arandic subgroup of Australian languages. In Claire Bowern & Harold Koch (eds.), Australian languages: Classification and the comparative method. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 249), 127–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. On reconstructing pronominal proto-paradigms: Methodological considerations from the Pama-Nyungan language family of Australia. In Bethwyn Evans (ed.), Discovering history through language: Papers in honour of Malcolm Ross (Pacific Linguistics 605), 317–344. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Morphological reconstruction. In Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 286–307. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koch, Harold, & Rachel Nordlinger (eds.). 2014. The languages and linguistics of Australia: A comprehensive guide (The World of Linguistics 3). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koch, Harold & Myfany Turpin. In preparation. A grammar of the Kaytetye language of Central Australia.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1977. Syntactic reanalysis. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change, 57–139. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langlois, Annie. 2004. Alive and kicking: Areyonga teenage Pitjantjatjara (Pacific Linguistics 561). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McConvell, Patrick. 1981. How Lardil became accusative. Lingua 55. 141–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simpson, Jane. 2001. Preferred word order and the grammaticalization of Associated Path. In Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds.), Time over matter: Diachronic perspectives on morphosyntax, 173–208. Stanford: Centre for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Timberlake, Alan. 1977. Reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change, 141–177. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilkins, David P. 1989. Mparntwe Arrernte: Studies in the structure and semantics of grammar. PhD dissertation. Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1991. The semantics, pragmatics and diachronic development of ‘associated motion’ in Mparntwe Arrernte. Buffalo Papers in Linguistics 91(1). 207–257.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006. Towards an Arrernte grammar of space. In Stephen C. Levinson & David P. Wilkins (eds.), Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity, 24–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yallop, Colin. 1977. Alyawarra: An Aboriginal language of central Australia. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Koch, Harold
2020. Development of aspect markers in Arandic languages, with notes on associated motion. Journal of Historical Linguistics 10:2 ► pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Koch, Harold
2022. Development of aspect markers in Arandic languages, with notes on associated motion. In Development of Tense and Aspect Systems [Benjamins Current Topics, 123], ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Panther, Forrest & Mark Harvey
2020. Associated Path in Kaytetye. Australian Journal of Linguistics 40:1 ► pp. 74 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue