In:Perspectives on Language Structure and Language Change: Studies in honor of Henning Andersen
Edited by Lars Heltoft, Iván Igartua, Brian D. Joseph, Kirsten Jeppesen Kragh and Lene Schøsler
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 345] 2019
► pp. 181–191
Anticausative and passive in Vedic
Which way reanalysis?
Published online: 18 June 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.345.07hoc
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.345.07hoc
In a 2001 publication on reanalysis and linguistic change, Henning Andersen states that “(i)t is not clear yet what constitutes structural ambiguity in surface realizations; this remains a question for the future”. As a tribute to Henning, this paper examines a case of (near-)systematic structural ambiguity regarding Vedic passives and anticausatives and demonstrates that this ambiguity creates serious obstacles to determining whether anticausatives are reanalyzed from passives or vice versa. In fact, given the persistent structural ambiguity it is possible that different speakers preferred different accounts, whether for all relevant verbs, for subsets of the verbs, or even for individual verbs, in individual contexts.
Keywords: reanalysis, structural ambiguity, passive, anticausative, historical change
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Structural characteristics of passive vs. anticausative in Vedic
- 3.Historical relationship between passives and anticausatives
- 3.1Early accounts
- 3.2Kulikov’s accounts and a possible alternative
- 3.3Another alternative account
- 3.4A further possibility
- 3.5Evaluation and conclusions
Notes References
References (23)
. 1980. Morphological change: Towards a typology. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical morphology, 1–50. The Hague: Mouton.
. 2001. Actualization and the (uni)directionality of change. In Henning Andersen (ed.), Actualization, 225–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2006. Synchrony, diachrony, and evolution. In Ole Nedergaard Thomsen (ed.), Competing models of linguistic change: Evolution and beyond, 59–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Avery, John. 1872. Contributions to the history of verb-inflection in Sanskrit. Journal of the American Oriental Society 10. 219–324.
Delbrück, B[erthold]. 1874. Das altindische Verbum aus den Hymnen des Ṛigveda seinem Baue nach dargestellt. Halle: Waisenhaus.
Delbrück, Bert[h]old. 1888. Altindische Syntax. Halle: Waisenhaus. Repr. 1968, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Geldner, Karl Friedrich (transl). 1951. Der Rig-Veda aus dem Sanskrit ins Deutsche übersetzt und mit einem laufenden Kommentar versehen, 3 vols. (Harvard Oriental Series, 33–35.) Repr. 2003 in one volume (Harvard Oriental Series, 63), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Department of Sanskrit and Indian Studies.
Griffith, Ralph T. H. 1895–1896. The hymns of the Atharvaveda. Benares/London: Lazarus & Co./Luzac & Co.
Grassmann, Hermann. 1873. Wörterbuch zum Rig-Veda. Leipzig: Brockhaus. Repr. 1964, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Hock, Hans Henrich. 2016. Pāṇini’s language: Real or not? In Andrew Miles Bird, Jessica DeLisi, and Mark Wenthe (eds.), Tavet tat satyam: Studies in honor of Jared S. Klein on the occasion of his seventieth birthday, 101–112. Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press.
Jamison, Stephanie W., and Joel P. Brereton (transl.). 2014.
The Rigveda: The earliest religious poetry of India, 2 vols. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kulikov, Leonid. 1996. Vedic -ya-presents: Semantics and the placement of stress. In Wolfgang Meid (ed.), Sprache und Kultur der Indogermanen: Akten der X. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft Innsbruck, 22.-28. September 1996, 341–350. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.
. 2011a. Drifting between passive and anticausative: True and alleged accent shifts in the history of Vedic -ya-presents.
Вопросы языкового родства
/Journal of Language Relationship 6. 185–215.
. 2011b. Passive to anticausative through impersonalization: The case of Vedic and Indo-European. In Andrej Malchukov and Anna Siwierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective, 229–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2012.
The Vedic -ya-presents: Passives and intransitivity in Old Indo-Aryan
. Amsterdam: Rodopi. (Revision of Kulikov 2001; not available to me.)
Śarmā Ācārya, Śrīrām. 2005. Atharvaveda saṁhitā [
saral hindī bhāvārth sahit
], 1. Mathurā: Gāyatrī Tapobhūmi.
Whitney, William Dwight. 1879. Sanskrit grammar including both the classical language, and the older dialects, of Veda and Brahmana. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel. (2nd ed. 1889, repr. 1955, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.)
