Cover not available

In:Language Variation and Contact-Induced Change: Spanish across space and time
Edited by Jeremy King and Sandro Sessarego
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 340] 2018
► pp. 299–333

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 13
Espero estén todos

The distribution of the null subordinating complementizer in two varieties of Spanish

Published online: 13 March 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.340.14ric
Abstract
This study adopts a quantitative methodology to investigate variation between null and overt expressions of Spanish complementizer que. I focus on two varieties of Spanish from Mexico City and Los Angeles, California. This research uses a corpus linguistics–inspired methodology, relying on Twitter as a database to extract tokens and Rrbul (Johnson 2008) to perform the multivariate analysis. I extracted and analyzed 1,505 tokens and coded for 9 linguistic and 2 extra-linguistic factors. I showed the internal factors ‘verb modality’ and ‘embedded subject status’ to significantly affect the alternation, favoring the null option. Contrary to what was expected, the external factor ‘city’ did not have any significant effect on the distribution. I discuss the results in light of formal and sociolinguistic studies on the nature of subordinated constructions in Spanish (Brovetto 2002; Etxepare 1996; Subirats-Rüggeberg 1987), English (Tagliamonte & Smith 2005) and Spanish in contact with English (Silva-Corvalán 1993, 1994, 1998).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Null complementizers in Spanish
  • 3.Subordinating complementizer that/∅ in English
  • 4.Goals, research questions, and hypotheses
  • 5. Methodology
  • 6.Results
  • 7.Discussion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (46)
References
Antonelli, André L. 2013. “The Structure of Complementizerless Clauses in Classical Portuguese”. Romance Linguistics 2012: Selected Papers from the 42nd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Cedar City, Utah, 20–22 April 2012, ed. by Jason Smith & Tabea Ihsane, 185–198. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bahtchevanova, Mariana. 2007. “Mood, Modality, and Complementation: A Cross-Linguistic Study of the Syntax and Semantics of the Left Periphery”. Tempe, Ariz.: Ph.D. dissertation, Arizona State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brovetto, Claudia. 2002. “Spanish Clauses without Complementizers”. Current issues in Romance languages ed. by Teresa Satterfield, Christina Tortora & Diana Cresti, Current Issues in Linguistic Theory vol. 220, 19–43. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cattell, Ray 1978. “On the Source of Interrogative Adverbs”. Language 54.61–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christodulelis, Eleni. 2014. The Importance of Clause Type in Portuguese (Un)Inflected Infinitives. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 43, October 11, 2014. Chicago.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elseness, Johan 1984. “That or Zero? A Look at Choice of Object Clause Connective in a Corpus of American English”. English Studies: A Journal of English Language 65.519–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
¿Es peligroso fumar en un Taxi? (1977, Feb. 1), ABC. Retrieved from [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Etxepare, Ricardo. 1996. “On ∅ Complementizers in Spanish”. Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca Julio de Urquijo 30:2.469–496.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. “On the Structure of Declarative Clauses”. Romance Linguistics: Theoretical Perspectives ed. by Armin Schwegler, Bernard Tranel & Myriam Uribe Etxebarria, Current Issues in Linguistics Theory vol. 160, 53–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 1995. “Functional Theory of Complementizers”. Modality in Grammar and Discourse ed. by Joan Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman, 473–502. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gonçalves, Bruno & David Sánchez. 2014. “Crowdsourcing Dialect Characterization through Twitter”. PLOS One. Retrieved from [URL]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haddican, Bill & Daniel Ezra Johnson. 2012. “Effects on the Particle Verb alternation across English Dialects”. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 18.2. Retrieved from [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Husting, Patrick. 2014. Plus One Social Insight. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra. 2008. “Getting off the GoldVarb Standard: Introducing Rbrul for Mixed-Effects Variable Rule Analysis”. Language and Linguistics Compass 3:1.359–383. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kearns, Kate. 2007. “Epistemic Verbs and Zero Complementizer”. English Language and Linguistics 11.475–505. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiefer, Ferenc. 1998. “Modality”. Handbook of Pragmatics 4 ed. by Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert & Chris Bulcaen, 1–36. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirkorian, Raffi. 2013, August 16. New Tweets per Second Record, and How! Retrieved from [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCormick, Tyler, Hedwig Lee, Nina Cesare & Ali Shojaie. 2013. “Using Twitter for Demographic and Social Science Research Tools for Data Collection”. CSSS Working Papers, 127. Seattle, Wash.: University of Washington Center for Statistics and the Social Sciences.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce. 1985. Old English Syntax, vols. 1–2. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mosqueda, Alejandro & Paloma Moreda. 2012. “SMILE: An Informality Classification Tool for Helping to Assess Quality and Credibility in Web 2.0 Texts”. AAAI Technical Report WS-12-02 Real-Time Analysis and Mining of Social Streams.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murphy, Melissa. 2008. The Role of Typological Drift in the Evolution of the Romance Subjunctive: A Study in Word-Order Change, Grammaticalization, and Synthesis. Austin, Tex.: Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Orozco, Rafael. 2015. “Castilian in New York City: What Can We Learn From the Future?” New Perspectives on Hispanic Contact Linguistics in the Americas ed. by Sandro Sessarego & Melvin González-Rivera, 347–371. Madrid & Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/ Vervuert.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palander-Collin, Minna. 1997. “A Medieval Case of Grammaticalization, methinks ”. In Grammaticalization at Work (Studies of Long-Term Developments in English 24) ed. by Matti Rissanen, Merja Kytö & Kirsi Heikkonen, 371–403. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pang, Bo & Lillian Lee. 2008. “Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis”. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 2:1–2.1–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pons, Bordería, Salvador. 2003. “ Que inicial átono como marca de modalidad”. Estudios de lingüística 17.531–545.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Porroche Ballesteros, Margarita. 2000. “Algunos aspectos de que en el español conversacional”. Círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación 3. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Development Core Team 2008. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [URL].
Rescher, Nicholas. 1968. Topics in Philosophical Logic. Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti. 1991. “On the History of that/zero as Object Clause Links in English”. English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik ed. by Karin Aijmer & Bengt Altenberg, 272–89. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. “The Finite Structure of the Left Periphery”. Elements of Grammar ed. by Lillian Haegeman, 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwe. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1993. “On the Permeability of Grammars: Evidence from Spanish and English Contact”. Linguistic Perspectives on Romance Languages ed. by William J. Ashby, Marianne Mithun & Giorgio Perissinotto, 19–43. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Language Contact and Change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. “On Borrowing as a Mechanism of Syntactic Change”. Romance Linguistics: Theoretical Perspectives ed. by Armin Schwegler, Bernard Tranel & Myriam Uribe-Etxebarría, 225–247. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “The Limits of Convergence on Language Contact”. Language Contact and the Dynamics of Language: Theory and Implications. Symposium conducted at the Max Planck InstituteLeipzig.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Subirats-Rüggeberg, Carlos 1987. “Sentential Complementation in Spanish: A Lexico-Grammatical Study of Three Classes of Verbs”. Lingvisticae Investigationes Supplementa: Études en Linguistique Française et Générale 14 ed. by Jean Claude Chevalier, Maurice Gross & Christian Leclère. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Jennifer Smith. 2005. “No Momentary Fancy! The Zero ‘Complementizer’ in English Dialects”. English Language and Linguistics 9.289–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Anthony J. Mulac. 1991a. “A Quantitative Perspective on the Grammaticization of Epistemic Parentheticals in English”. Grammaticalization II ed. by Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine, 313–339. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991b. “The Discourse Conditions for the Use of the Complementizer that in Conversational English”. Journal of Pragmatics 15.237–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2005. “Constructions in Grammaticalization”. The Handbook of Historical Linguistics ed. by Brian Joseph & Richard Janda, 624–647. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torrego, Esther. 1983. “More Effects of Successive Cyclic Movement”. Linguistic Inquiry 14.561–565.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Villa-García, Julio. 2014. The Syntax of Multiple-Que Sentences in Spanish: Along the Left Periphery . Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker, James & Rena Torres Cacoullos 2003. How to Take a Complement in Canadian English. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 32, October 2003. Philadelphia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Warner, Anthony 1983. Complementation in Middle English and the Methodology of Historical Syntax. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zagona, Karen. 2002. The Syntax of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele. 2011. “Ambient Affiliation: A Linguistic Perspective on Twitter”. New Media Society 13.788. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Balam, Osmer, Lidia Pérez Leutza, Ian Michalski & María del Carmen Parafita Couto
2024. A semantic analysis of bilingual compound verbs in two contact Spanish communities. Research in Corpus Linguistics 12:1 ► pp. 140 ff. DOI logo
Bleaman, Isaac L. & Rhea Kommerell
2024. A computational approach to detecting the envelope of variation. Linguistics Vanguard 10:1 ► pp. 385 ff. DOI logo
Clemons, Aris Moreno
2020. New Blacks: Language, DNA, and the Construction of the African American/Dominican Boundary of Difference. Genealogy 5:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue