In:Afroasiatic: Data and perspectives
Edited by Mauro Tosco
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 339] 2018
► pp. 167–184
Possessive and genitive constructions in Dahālik (Ethiosemitic)
Published online: 1 February 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.339.10sim
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.339.10sim
Abstract
There have been few comparative studies of possessive or genitive relationships within the Modern South Arabian (MSA) group, but Dahalik, an Ethiosemitic language, had never been the subject of any study on this topic. In fact the language itself was completely unknown until 1997 and could not be fully investigated because of the inaccessibility of the region since 2006. This article attempts to give details on these constructions in Dahalik to compare the different strategies for determining the noun in some Southern Semitic languages of Arabia and the Horn of Africa.
By providing such comparisons this chapter highlights the common features of these languages and the characteristics of Dahalik within the Southern Semitic group as a specific Afrosemitic language.
All the Dahalik data have been collected during my fieldworks in Eritrea,1 on the three inhabited islands of Dahlak Archipelago, on the continent in Massawa and suburbs. They are compared with the available data on MSA, Tigre and Tigrinya (see references below and Simeone-Senelle 2014: 686–687).
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Possessive and genitive constructions
- 2.1Synthetic construction
- 2.1.1 n + n
- 2.1.2 n=suf.pr
- 2.1.3Definiteness degree within the synthetic structure
- 2.1.3.1The definite article
- 2.1.3.2Deictic as a definite marker for n1: n1=deic + n2
- 2.1.3.3The suffix pronoun as a determinative marker of n1 or n2
- 2.1.3.4Concluding remarks
- 2.2Analytic construction
-
2.2.1Indirect construction: n + link=n/suf.pr
- 2.2.1.1Semantic values
- 2.2.1.2Analytic construction vs. synthetic construction
- 2.2.2Definiteness degree within the analytic structure
- 2.2.3Remarks on word order in Dahalik, MSA, Tigre, and Tigrinya
-
2.2.1Indirect construction: n + link=n/suf.pr
- 2.1Synthetic construction
- 3.Conclusion
Abbreviations Acknowledgements Notes References
References (12)
Elias, David Lyndon. 2005. Tigre of Habab: Short Grammar and Texts from the Rigbat People. Cambridge, MA: Departement of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, Harvard University.
Leslau, Wolf. 1941. Documents tigrigna (Ethiopien septentrional). Grammaire et textes. Paris: Klincksieck.
. 1945. Short Grammar of Tigré: The verb in Tigré (North-Ethiopic), Dialect of Mensa. Pub. of the American Oriental Society. Offprint 18. New Haven, CN: American Oriental Studies.
Simeone-Senelle, Marie-Claude. 2005. “La détermination du nom en dahaalik”. XI Incontro Italiano di Linguistica Camito-Semitica. 5–7 giugno 2003, University of Bergamo, ed. by Alessandro Mengozzi, 03–217. Milano: Franco Angeli.
. 2006. “Some Characteristics of Dahalik, a Newly Discovered Afro-Semitic Language Spoken in Eritrea”. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference of Ethiopian Studies, Hamburg, July 2003, ed. by Siegbert Uhlig, Maria Bulakh, Denis Nosnitsin & Thomas Rave, 861–869. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
. 2008a. “A Survey of the Dahalik Language”. [URL].
. 2008b. “Up to Date Assessment of the Results of the Research on the Dahalik Language”. (December 1996–December 2005) [URL]
. 2010a. “The Specificity of the Dahalik Language within the Afro-Semitic Languages”. History and Languages of the Tigre Speaking Peoples, ed. by Gianfrancesco Lusini, 127–145. Napoli: Università di Napoli L’Orientale.