In:Development of Tense/Aspect in Semitic in the Context of Afro-Asiatic Languages:
Vit Bubenik
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 337] 2017
► pp. 173–210
Chapter 10Typology and universals of tense and aspect
Published online: 15 May 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.337.c10
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.337.c10
Article outline
- 10.1The exploitation of ablaut for aspectual purposes
- 10.2Indo-European parallels to the development of the inflectional perfect in Semitic
- 10.3Turkic parallels to the aspectual trichotomy in AA and IE phyla
- 10.4The establishment of the Perfect and the Middle in Semitic
- 10.5The notional proximity of the Perfective and Perfect (Retrospective)
- 10.6From aspect-prominent to tense-prominent typology
- 10.7Analytic formations in Ancient IE and AA languages
- 10.8Typology and universals of tense and aspect
- 10.9The relationship of quasinominal forms to their finite counterparts
- 10.10Contribution of AA to general Historical Linguistics
Notes
