Cover not available

In:Exaptation and Language Change
Edited by Muriel Norde and Freek Van de Velde
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 336] 2016
► pp. 197–225

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Exaptation and degrammaticalization within an acquisition-based model of abductive reanalysis

Published online: 24 February 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.336.07wil
This article considers the relationship between exaptation and degrammaticalization. Both may involve obsolescent material being re-used, to express an existing grammatical category or a category not previously encoded. The processes involved are familiar ones: reanalysis triggering category reassignment. In both cases, change is caused by failure to acquire a grammatical category. Faced with material that expresses that category, acquirers either interpret it as some existing category or else abduce the existence of some new category. Exaptation and degrammaticalization are thus understood as cases of reanalysis within an acquisition-based framework of change. The concept of exaptation is therefore useful but not foundational: useful in highlighting unexpected pathways of development during ongoing obsolescence or opacity, but explicable in terms of other processes. I demonstrate this approach using two case studies: degrammaticalization of indefinite pronouns as nouns in Slavic and Celtic; and exaptive reinterpretation of the was-were distinction as expressing polarity in English dialects.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Definitional issues
    • 2.1Definitions of and motivations for degrammaticalization
    • 2.2Definitions of exaptation
  • 3.Degrammaticalization “something” > “thing”
  • 4.Exaptation of the English was-were distinction
  • 5.Is all degrammaticalization and exaptation due to obsolescence?
  • 6.Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Texts cited
  • References
References (87)
Texts cited
Betha Colaim Chille, Life of Colum Cille, Compiled by Manus O’Donnell in 1532 ed. by A. O’Kelleher and G. Schoepperle. Urbana: University of Illinois, 1918.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
The Book of Leinster, Formerly Lebar na Núachongbála ed. by R.I. Best, Osborn Bergin, M. A. O’Brien and Anne O’Sullivan. 6 vols. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, 1954–83.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
“Bulgarian National Corpus”. Sofia: Institute for Bulgarian Language, 2009–2014, [URL].
Suprasălski ili Retkov Sbornik ed. by Jordan Zaimov and Mario Kapaldo. Sofia: Izdatelstvo na Bălgarskata Akademija na Naukite, 1982. [ Codex Suprasliensis ]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
“A dictionary of the Old-Irish glosses in the Milan Codex Ambrosianus C 301 inf.” ed. by Aaron Griffith and David Stifter. [URL]. [ Milan glosses ]
“The Evernew Tongue” ed. by Whitley Stokes. Ériu 2.96–162. [ Tenga Bithnúa ]
References
Adger, David & Jennifer Smith. 2005. “Variation and the Minimalist Program”. Syntax and Variation: Reconciling the biological and the social ed. by Leonie Cornips & Karen P. Corrigan (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 265), 149–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Variation in Agreement: A lexical feature-based approach”. Lingua 120.1109–1134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allen, Cynthia L. 2003. “Deflexion and the Development of the Genitive in English”. English Language and Linguistics 7.1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. Genitives in Early English: Typology and evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andersen, Henning. 1973. “Abductive and Deductive Change”. Language 49.765–793. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “Grammaticalization in a Speaker-oriented Theory of Change”. Grammatical Change and Linguistic Theory: The Rosendal papers ed. by Thórhallur Eythórsson, 11–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Börjars, Kersti. 2003. “Morphological Status and (De)grammaticalisation: The Swedish possessive”. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 26.133–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 2000. The Structure of Modern English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Britain, David. 2002. “Diffusion, Levelling, Simplification and Reallocation in Past Tense BE in the English Fens”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6.16–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burridge, Kate. 1998. “From Modal Auxiliary to Lexical Verb: The curious case of Pennsylvania German wotte ”. Historical Linguistics 1995: Selected papers from the 12th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Manchester, August 1995 ed. by Richard M. Hogg & Linda van Bergen, vol. II, 19–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chambers, J.K. 2004. “Dynamic Typology and Vernacular Universals”. Dialectology Meets Typology: Dialect grammar from a crosslinguistic perspective ed. by Bernd Kortmann, 127–145. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny & Sue Fox. 2009. “ Was/were Variation: A perspective from London”. Language Variation and Change 21.1–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter W. 2009. Natural Language Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1999. “Review Essay, Muriel Norde: The history of the genitive in Swedish. A case study in degrammaticalization [doctoral dissertation], 1997”. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 22.77–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. “The Swedish Genitive: A reply to Norde”. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 24.119–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doyle, Aidan. 2002. “Yesterday’s Affixes as Today’s Clitics”. New Reflections on Grammaticalization ed. by Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald, 67–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckhoff, Hanne & Dag Haug. 2009. “Aligning Syntax in Early New Testament Texts: The PROIEL Corpus”. Diachronic Slavonic Syntax: Gradual changes in focus ed. by Björn Hansen & Jasmina Grković-Major, 41–51. Munich: Verlag Otto Sagner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giegerich, Heinz J. 1999. Lexical Strata in English: Morphological causes, phonological effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greene, David. 1958. “The Analytic Form of the Verb in Irish”. Ériu 18.108–112.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1973. “Synthetic and Analytic: A reconsideration”. Ériu 24.121–133.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haas, Nynke de. 2008. “The Origins of the Northern Subject Rule”. English Historical Linguistics 2006: Selected papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 14), Bergamo, 21–25 August 2006 ed. by Marina Dossena, Richard Dury & Maurizio Gotti, 111–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Morphosyntactic Variation in Northern English: The Northern Subject Rule, its origins and early history. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer. 2002. “From Speech Perception to Morphology: Affix order revisited”. Language 78.527–555. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer & Ingo Plag. 2004. “What Constrains Possible Suffix Combinations? On the interaction of grammatical and processing restrictions in derivational morphology”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22.565–596. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2003. “On Degrammaticalization”. Historical Linguistics 2001: Selected papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Melbourne, 13–17 August 2001 ed. by Barry J. Blake & Kate Burridge, 163–179. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Honeybone, Patrick. 2007. “Diachronic Tendencies in Historical Phonology: The case of ‘secondary contractions’ in northern English”. Paper presented at the 18th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Montreal.
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003 [1993]. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Isaac, Graham. 2003. “Diagnosing the Symptoms of Contact: Some Celtic-English case histories”. The Celtic Englishes III ed. by Hildegard L.C. Tristram, 46–64. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1922. Language: Its nature, development and origin. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 2012. “Grammaticalization as Optimization”. Grammatical Change: Origins, nature, outcomes ed. by Dianne Jonas, John Whitman & Andrew Garrett, 15–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klemola, Juhani. 2000. “The Origins of the Northern Subject Rule: A case of early contact?” The Celtic Englishes II ed. by Hildegard L.C. Tristram, 329–346. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuzmack, Stefanie. 2007. “ Ish: A new case of antigrammaticalization”. Ms., University of Chicago.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1977. “Syntactic Reanalysis”. Mechanisms of Syntactic Change ed. by Charles N. Li, 57–139. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1990. “How to do Things with Junk: Exaptation in language evolution”. Journal of Linguistics 26.79–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. “Phonology and Morphology”. The Cambridge History of the English Language: Volume II, 1066–1476 ed. by Norman Blake, 23–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mahon, William. 1993. “First plural mar in Connacht Irish”. Éigse 27.81–88.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCafferty, Kevin. 2003. “The Northern Subject Rule in Ulster: How Scots, how English?” Language Variation and Change 15.105–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yo. 1988. “From Bound Grammatical Markers to Free Discourse Markers: History of some Japanese connectives”. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 340–351.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matushansky, Ora. 2002. “More of a Good Thing: Russian synthetic and analytic comparatives”. Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The second Ann Arbor meeting, 2001 ed. by Jindřich Toman, 143–162. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meisel, Jürgen M. 2011. “Bilingual Language Acquisition and Theories of Diachronic Change: Bilingualism as cause and effect of grammatical change”. Bilingualism 14.121–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “Exaptation, Grammaticalization, and Reanalysis”. California Linguistic Notes 32.1–25.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nilsen, K. 1974. “A New Third Person Plural Subject pronoun”. Éigse 15.114–116.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel. 1998. “Grammaticalization versus Reanalysis: The case of possessive constructions in Germanic”. Historical linguistics 1995: Selected papers from the 12th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Manchester, August 1995 ed. by Richard M. Hogg & Linda van Bergen, 211–222. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001a. “Deflexion as a Counterdirectional Factor in Grammatical Change”. Language Sciences 23.231–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001b. “The History of the Swedish Genitive: The full story”. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 24.107–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. “The Final Stages of Grammaticalization: Affixhood and beyond”. New Reflections on Grammaticalization ed. by Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald, 45–65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Demarcating Degrammaticalization: The Swedish s-genitive revisited”. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 29.201–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Grammaticalization: Three common controversies”. Grammaticalization: Current views and issues ed. by Katerina Stathi, Elke Gehweiler & Ekkehard König, 123–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ó Buachalla, Breandán. 1970. “ Muinn ‘we’ in Southeast Ulster”. Éigse 13.31–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petyt, K.M. 1978. “Secondary Contraction in West Yorkshire Negatives”. Sociolinguistic Patterns ed. by Peter Trudgill, 91–100. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pietsch, Lukas. 2005. “‘Some Do and Some Doesn’t’: Verbal concord variation in the north of the British Isles”. A Comparative Grammar of British English Dialects: Agreement, gender, relative clauses ed. by Bernd Kortmann, Tanja Hermann, Lukas Pietsch & Susanne Wagner, 125–210. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plank, Franz. 1995. “Entgrammatisierung: Spiegelbild der Grammatisierung?” Natürlichkeitstheorie und Sprachwandel ed. by Norbert Boretzky & Andreas Bittner, 199–219. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian G. 1993. “A Formal Account of Grammaticalisation in the History of Romance Futures”. Folia Linguistica Historica 13.219–258.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian G. & Anna Roussou. 2003. Syntactic Change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roma, Elisa. 2000. “How Subject Pronouns Spread in Irish: A diachronic study and synchronic account of the third person + pronoun pattern”. Ériu 51.107–157.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schilling-Estes, Natalie & Walt Wolfram. 1994. “Convergent Explanation and Alternative Regularization Patterns: Were/weren’t levelling in a vernacular English variety”. Language Variation and Change 6.273–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon, Horst J. 2010. “‘Exaptation’ in der Sprachwandeltheorie: Eine Begriffspräzisierung”. Prozesse sprachlicher Verstärkung: Typen formaler Resegmentierung und semantischer Remotivierung ed. by Rüdiger Harnisch, 41–57. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sussex, Roland & Paul Cubberley. 2006. The Slavic Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 1998. “ Was/were Variation across the Generations: View from the city of York”. Language Variation and Change 10.153–191. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thurneysen, Rudolf. 1946. A Grammar of Old Irish. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toner, Gregory, Grigory Bondarenko & Sharon Arbuthnot. 2013. “Electronic Dictionary of the Irish Language”, [URL].
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2004. “Exaptation and Grammaticalization”. Linguistic Studies based on Corpora ed. by Minoji Akimoto, 133–156. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme & Muriel Norde. 2013. “Degrammaticalization and Constructionalization: Two case studies”. Language Sciences 36.32–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic Typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vincent, Nigel. 1995. “Exaptation and Grammaticalization”. Historical Linguistics 1993: Selected papers from the 11th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Los Angeles, 16–20 August 1993 ed. by Henning Andersen, 433–445. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, N.J.A. 1968. “ Muinn ‘we’ in Southeast Ulster”. Éigse 12.297–300.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Willis, David. 2007. “Syntactic Lexicalization as a New Type of Degrammaticalization”. Linguistics 45.271–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Old and Middle Welsh”. The Celtic Languages ed. by Martin Ball & Nicole Müller, 117–160. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Degrammaticalization and Obsolescent Morphology: Evidence from Slavonic”. Grammaticalization: Current views and issues ed. by Katerina Stathi, Elke Gehweiler & Ekkehard König, 151–177. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013a. “The History of Negation in the Brythonic Celtic Languages”. The History of Negation in the Languages of Europe and the Mediterranean, Volume 1: Case studies ed. by David Willis, Christopher Lucas & Anne Breitbarth, 239–298. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013b. “The History of Negation in the Slavonic languages”. The History of Negation in the Languages of Europe and the Mediterranean, Volume 1: Case studies ed. by David Willis, Christopher Lucas & Anne Breitbarth, 341–398. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wischer, Ilse. 2010. “Sekretion und Exaptation als Mechanismen in der Wortbildung und Grammatik”. Prozesse sprachlicher Verstärkung: Typen formaler Resegmentierung und semantischer Remotivierung ed. by Rüdiger Harnisch, 29–40. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 1983. “Cliticization vs. Inflection: English -n’t ”. Language 59.502–513. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (19)

Cited by 19 other publications

D’Antuono, Nicola
2024. From Latin QUO(D) VELLES to Romagnol Cvël: A Case of Degrammaticalisation from a Free‐choice Indefinite to the Noun ‘Thing’1. Transactions of the Philological Society 122:1 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Maiden, Martin, Adina Dragomirescu, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Oana Uță Bărbulescu & Rodica Zafiu
2021. The verb. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology, ► pp. 258 ff. DOI logo
Maiden, Martin, Adina Dragomirescu, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Oana Uță Bărbulescu & Rodica Zafiu
2021. Nouns and adjectives. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology, ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Maiden, Martin, Adina Dragomirescu, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Oana Uță Bărbulescu & Rodica Zafiu
2021. Word formation in diachrony. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology, ► pp. 383 ff. DOI logo
Maiden, Martin, Adina Dragomirescu, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Oana Uță Bărbulescu & Rodica Zafiu
2021. Determiners and the deictic system. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology, ► pp. 201 ff. DOI logo
Maiden, Martin, Adina Dragomirescu, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Oana Uță Bărbulescu & Rodica Zafiu
2021. Conclusion. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology, ► pp. 474 ff. DOI logo
Maiden, Martin, Adina Dragomirescu, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Oana Uță Bărbulescu & Rodica Zafiu
2021. Pronominal and indefinite structures. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology, ► pp. 140 ff. DOI logo
Maiden, Martin, Adina Dragomirescu, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Oana Uță Bărbulescu & Rodica Zafiu
2021. Possessives. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology, ► pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
Maiden, Martin, Adina Dragomirescu, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Oana Uță Bărbulescu & Rodica Zafiu
2021. Introduction. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Maiden, Martin, Adina Dragomirescu, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Oana Uţă & Rodica Zafiu
2021. The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology, DOI logo
Rupp, Laura & David Britain
2019. Introduction. In Linguistic Perspectives on a Variable English Morpheme, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Rupp, Laura & David Britain
2019. Verbal –s. In Linguistic Perspectives on a Variable English Morpheme, ► pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Rupp, Laura & David Britain
2019. Past BE. In Linguistic Perspectives on a Variable English Morpheme, ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Van de Velde, Freek
2018. Iterated Exaptation. In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology, 4], ► pp. 519 ff. DOI logo
Willis, David
2017. Degrammaticalization. In The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax, ► pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Copyright Page. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology, ► pp. iv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Abbreviations, symbols, journal acronyms, and other conventions. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology, ► pp. xv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Preface. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology, ► pp. xiii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Textual sources. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology, ► pp. 479 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue