Cover not available

In:The Phonetics–Phonology Interface: Representations and methodologies
Edited by Joaquín Romero and María Riera
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 335] 2015
► pp. 259–284

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Categories and gradience in intonation

A functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging study

 | University of Cambridge
 | University of Cambridge
 | University of Cambridge
 | University of Cambridge
 | University of Cambridge
Published online: 10 November 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.335.13pos
The Autosegmental-Metrical framework (AM) assumes that a distinction needs to be made between linguistic phonological information (categorical) and paralinguistic phonetic information (gradient) in intonation. However, empirical evidence supporting this assumption has proved to be elusive so far. In this study we analysed whether the theoretical distinction is reflected in perceptual biases and neural activation in the brain. The results of a combined behavioural and neuroimaging study demonstrate that intonational function indeed activates different but overlapping neural networks with more widespread activation for categorical phonological stimuli, especially in middle temporal gyrus bilaterally and left supramarginal and inferior parietal areas. In contrast, for paralinguistic gradient stimuli activation is restricted to right inferior frontal gyrus. These neural differences mirror differences in response times in a listening experiment testing categorical perception for the same stimuli. These findings support a theoretical model of intonation, such as AM, in which linguistic and paralinguistic information are distinguished.
References (73)
References
Best, Catherine T. 2015. “Devil or Angel in the Details?: Perceiving phonetic variation as information about phonological structure”. This volume.
Binder, Jeffrey R., Rutvik H. Desai, William W. Graves & Lisa L. Conant. 2009. “Where is the Semantic System?: A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies”. Cerebral Cortex 19:12.2767-2796. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boatman, Dana. 2004. “Cortical Bases of Speech Perception: Evidence from functional lesion studies”. Cognition 92:1-2.47-65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2010. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer: Version 5.2. ([URL]) (Retrieved on October 29, 2010).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1970. “Relative Height”. Prosodic Feature Analysis ed. by Pierre R. Léon., Georges Faure & André Rigault, 109-125. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. Intonation and its Parts: Melody in spoken English. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borràs-Comes, Joan, Jordi Costa-Faidella, Pilar Prieto & Carles Escera. 2012. “Specific Neural Traces for Intonational Discourse Categories as Revealed by Human-Evoked Potentials”. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24:4.843-853. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brett, Matthew, Alexander P. Leff, Chris Rorden & John Ashburner. 2001. “Spatial Normalization of Brain Images with Focal Lesions Using Cost Function Masking”. NeuroImage 14:2.486-500. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burton, Martha W., Steven L. Small & Sheila E. Blumstein. 2000. “The Role of Segmentation in Phonological Processing: An fMRI investigation”. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12:4.679-690. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chandrasekaran, Bharath, Ananthanarayan Krishnan & Jackson T. Gandour. 2007. “Mismatch Negativity to Pitch Contours is Influenced by Language Experience”. Brain Research 1128.148-156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Relative Influence of Musical and Linguistic Experience on Early Cortical Processing of Pitch Contours”. Brain and Language 108:1.1-9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Aoju. 2005. Universal and Language-Specific Perception of Paralinguistic Intonational Meaning. Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht: Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap (LOT).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coleman, John. 1998. “Cognitive Reality and the Phonological Lexicon: A review”. Journal of Neurolinguistics 11:3.295-320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan. 1986. Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 1969. Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davis, Matthew H. & Ingrid S. Johnsrude. 2003. “Hierarchical Processing in Spoken Language Comprehension”. Journal of Neuroscience 23:8.3423-3431.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “Hearing Speech Sounds: Top-down influences on the interface between audition and speech perception”. Hearing Research, 229:1-2.132-147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dehaene-Lambertz, Ghislaine. 1997. “Electrophysiological Correlates of Categorical Phoneme Perception in Adults”. NeuroReport 8:4.919-924. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dehaene-Lambertz, Ghislaine, Christophe Pallier, Willy Serniclaes, Liliane Sprenger-Charolles, Antoinette Jobert & Stanislas Dehaene. 2005. “Neural Correlates of Switching from Auditory to Speech Perception”. NeuroImage 24:1.21-33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doherty, Colin P., W. Caroline West, Laura C. Dilley, Stefanie Shattuck‐Hufnagel & David Caplan. 2004. “Question/statement judgments: an fMRI study of intonation processing”. Human Brain Mapping 23:2.85-98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eulitz, Carsten & Aditi Lahiri. 2004. “Neurobiological Evidence for Abstract Phonological Representations in the Mental Lexicon during Speech Recognition”. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16:4.577-583. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friston, Karl. 1997. “Imaging Cognitive Anatomy”. Trends in Cognitive Science 1:1.21-27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gandour, Jack, Mario Dzemidzic, Donald Wong, Mark Lowe, Yunxia Tong, Li Hsieh, Nakarin Satthamnuwong & Joseph Lurito. 2003a. “Temporal Integration of Speech Prosody is Shaped by Language Experience: An fMRI study”. Brain and Language 84:4.318-336. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gandour, Jack, Donald Wong, Mario Dzemidzic, Mark Lowe, Yunxia Tong & Xiaojian Li. 2003b. “A Cross-Linguistic fMRI Study of Perception of Intonation and Emotion in Chinese”. Human Brain Mapping 18:3.149-157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gandour, Jack, Yisheng Xu, Donald Wong, Mario Dzemidzic, Mark Lowe, Xiaojian Li & Yunxia Tong. 2003c. “Neural Correlates of Segmental and Tonal Information in Speech Perception”. Human Brain Mapping 20:4.185-200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gandour, Jackson, Yunxia Tong, Donald Wong, Thomas Talavage, Mario Dzemidzic, Yisheng Xu, Xiaojian Li & Mark Lowe. 2004. “Hemispheric Roles in the Perception of Speech Prosody”. NeuroImage 23:1.344-357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grabe, Esther, Brechtje Post, Francis Nolan & Kimberley Farrar. 2000. “Pitch Accent Realisation in Four Varieties of British English”. Journal of Phonetics 28:2.161-185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grandjean, Didier & Klaus R. Scherer. 2006. “Examining the Neural Mechanisms Involved in the Affective and Pragmatic Coding of Prosody”. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Speech Prosody, Dresden, 2-5 May 2006 ed. by Rüdiger Hoffmann & Hansjörg Mixdorff, paper 268. Dresden: TUD Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 1984. On the Grammar and Semantics of Sentence Accents. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, Deborah A., Ingrid S. Johnsrude, Mark P. Haggard, Alan R. Palmer, Michael A. Akeroyd & A. Quentin Summerfield. 2002. “Spectral and Temporal Processing in Human Auditory Cortex”. Cerebral Cortex 12:2.140-149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henson, Richard. 2006. “Forward Inference Using Functional Neuroimaging: Dissociations versus associations”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10:2.64-69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hickok, Gregory & David Poeppel. 2000. “Towards a Functional Neuroanatomy of Speech Perception”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4:4.131-138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “The Cortical Organization of Speech Processing”. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8:5.393-402. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Indefrey, Peter & Willem J. M. Levelt. 2004. “The Spatial and Temporal Signatures of Word Production Components”. Cognition 92:1-2.101-144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah, ed. 2005. Prosodic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaas, Jon H., Troy A. Hackett & Mark Jude Tramo. 1999. “Auditory Processing in Primate Cerebral Cortex”. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 9:2.164-170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krishnan, Ananthanarayan, Jackson T. Gandour & Gavin M. Bidelman. 2010. “The Effects of Tone Language Experience on Pitch Processing in the Brainstem”. Journal of Neurolinguistics 23:1.81-95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert. 1981. “A First Look at the Semantics and Pragmatics of Negative Questions and Tag Questions”. Proceedings of Chicago Linguistics Society (CLS), vol. 17, 164-171. Chicago, Ill.: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert & Rachel Morton. 1997. “The Perception of Intonational Emphasis: Continuous or categorical?”. Journal of Phonetics 25:3.313-342. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lancaster, Jack L., Lacy H. Rainey, J. L. Summerlin, Catarina S. Freitas, Peter T. Fox, Alan C. Evans, Arthur W. Toga & John C. Mazziotta. 1997. “Automated Labeling of the Human Brain: A preliminary report on the development and evaluation of a forward-transform method”. Human Brain Mapping 5:4.238-242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lancaster, Jack L., Marty G. Woldorff, Lawrence M. Parsons, Mario Liotti, Catarina S. Freitas, Lacy Rainey, Peter V. Kochunov, Dan Nickerson, Shawn A. Mikiten & Peter T. Fox. 2000. “Automated Talairach Atlas Labels for Functional Brain Mapping”. Human Brain Mapping 10:3.120-131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leitman, David I., Daniel H. Wolf, J. Daniel Ragland, Petri Laukka, James Loughead, Jeffrey N. Valdez, Daniel C. Javitt, Bruce I. Turetsky & Ruben C. Gur. 2010. “It’s not what you Say, but how you Say it: A reciprocal temporo-frontal network for affective prosody”. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 4:19.1-13.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayer, Jörg, Dirk Wildgruber, Axel Riecker, Grzegorz Dogil, Hermann Ackermann & Wolfgang Grodd. 2002. “Prosody Production and Perception: Converging evidence from fMRI studies”. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Speech Prosody, Aix-en-Provence, 11-13 April 2002 ed. by Bernard Bel & Isabelle Marlien, 487-490. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence, Laboratoire Parole et Langage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McLachlan, Neil & Sarah Wilson. 2010. “The Central Role of Recognition in Auditory Perception: A neurobiological model”. Psychological Review117:1.175-196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitchell, Rachel L. C. & Elliott D. Ross. 2008. “fMRI Evidence for the Effect of Verbal Complexity on Lateralisation of the Neural Response Associated with Decoding Prosodic Emotion”. Neuropsychologia 46:12.2880-2887. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Obleser, Jonas, Henning Boecker, Alexander Drzezga, Bernhard Haslinger, Andreas Hennenlotter, Michael Roettinger, Carsten Eulitz & Josef P. Rauschecker. 2006. “Vowel Sound Extraction in Anterior Superior Temporal Cortex”. Human Brain Mapping 27:7.562-571. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Obleser, Jonas & Frank Eisner. 2009. “Pre-Lexical Abstraction of Speech in the Auditory Cortex”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13:1.14-19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Obleser, Jonas, Aditi Lahiri & Carsten Eulitz. 2004. “Magnetic Brain Response Mirrors Extraction of Phonological Features from Spoken Wowels”. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16:1.31-39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Phillips, Colin, Thomas Pellathy, Alec Marantz, Elron Yellin, Kenneth Wexler, David Poeppel, Martha McGinnis & Timothy Roberts. 2000. “Auditory Cortex Accesses Phonological Categories: An MEG mismatch study”. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12:6.1038-1055. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1980. The Phonetics and Phonology of English Intonation. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poldrack, Russell A. 2006. “Can Cognitive Processes Be Inferred from Neuroimaging Data?”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10:2.59-63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Post, Brechtje. 2000. Tonal and Phrasal Structures in French Intonation. Ph.D. dissertation, The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Post, Brechtje, Mariapaola D’Imperio & Carlos Gussenhoven. 2007. “Fine Phonetic Detail and Intonational Meaning”. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS16), Saarbrücken, 6-10 August 2007 ed. by Jurgen Trouvain & William J. Barry, 191-196. Saarbrücken: Universität des Saarlandes.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Price, Cathy J. 2010. “The Anatomy of Language: A review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009”. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1191.62-88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ren, Guiqin Q., Yufang Yang & Xiaoqing Li. 2009. “Early Cortical Processing of Linguistic Pitch Patterns as Revealed by the Mismatch Negativity”. Neuroscience 162:1.87-95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scherer, Klaus R., D. Robert Ladd & Kim E. A. Silverman. 1984. “Vocal Cues to Speaker Affect: Testing two models”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 76:5.1346-1356. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schirmer, Annett & Sonja A. Kotz. 2006. “Beyond the Right Hemisphere: Brain mechanisms mediating vocal emotional processing”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10:1.24-30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, Sophie K. & Ingrid S. Johnsrude 2003. “The Neuroanatomical and Functional Organisation of Speech Perception”. Trends in Neurosciences 26:2.100-107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharma, Anu & Michael F. Dorman. 2000. “Neurophysiologic Correlates of Cross-Language Phonetic Perception”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107:5.2697-2703. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shriberg, Elizabeth, D. Robert Ladd, Jacques Terken & Andreas Stolcke. 1996. “Modeling Intra-Speaker Pitch Range Variation: Predicting f0 targets when ‘speaking up’”. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 96), Philadelphia, Pa., 3-6 October 1996 ed. by H. Timothy Bunnell, Alfred I. Delaware & William Idsardi, vol. 2, 650-653. Philadelphia, Pa.: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, John R. 2003. Linguistic Categorization (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tramo, Mark. J., Peter A. Cariani, Christine K. Koh, Nikos Makris & Louis D. Braida. 2005. “Neurophysiology and Neuroanatomy of Pitch Perception: Auditory cortex”. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1060.148-174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyler, Lorraine K., Emmanuel A. Stamatakis, Brechtje Post, Billi Randall & William Marslen-Wilson. 2005. “Temporal and Frontal Systems in Speech Comprehension: An fMRI study of past tense processing”. Neuropsychologia 43:13.1963-1974. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tzourio-Mazoyer, Nathalie, Brigitte Landeau, Dimitri Papathanassiou, Fabrice Crivello, Olivier Etard, Nicolas Delcroix, Bernard Mazoyer & Marc Joliot. 2002. “Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain”. NeuroImage 15:1.273-289. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uldall, Elizabeth. 1964. “Dimensions of Meaning in Intonation”. In Honour of Daniel Jones: Papers contributed on the occasion of his eightieth birthday ed. by David Abercrombie, 271-279. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Lancker, Diana. 1980. “Cerebral Lateralization of Pitch Cues in the Linguistic Signal”. International Journal of Human Communication 13:2.201-277.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wildgruber, Dirk, Ingo Hertrich, Axel Riecker, Michael Erb, Silke Anders, W. Wolfgang Grodd & Hermann Ackermann. 2004. “Distinct Frontal Regions Subserve Evaluation of Linguistic and Emotional Aspects of Speech Intonation”. Cerebral Cortex 14:12.1384-1389. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xi, Jie, Linjun Zhang, Hua Shu, Yang Zhang & Ping Li. 2010. “Categorical Perception of Lexical Tones in Chinese Revealed by Mismatch Negativity”. Neuroscience 170:1.223-231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zatorre, Robert J., Alan C. Evans, Ernst Meyer & Albert Gjedde. 1992. “Lateralization of Phonetic and Pitch Discrimination in Speech Processing”. Science 256.846-849. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Linjun, Jie Xi, Guoqing Xu, Hua Shu, Xiaoyi Wang & Ping Li. 2011. “Cortical dynamics of acoustic and phonological processing in speech perception”. PLoS One 6:6.e20963. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

De Dominicis, Amedeo
2023. Neurological Evidence of the Phonological Nature of Tones. In Language Electrified [Neuromethods, 202], ► pp. 647 ff. DOI logo
Laméris, Tim Joris & Calbert Graham
2020. L2 Perception and Production of Japanese Lexical Pitch. Journal of Monolingual and Bilingual Speech 2:1 ► pp. 106 ff. DOI logo
Nolan, Francis
2020. Intonation. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, ► pp. 385 ff. DOI logo
Best, Catherine T.
2015. Devil or angel in the details?. In The Phonetics–Phonology Interface [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 335], ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue