Cover not available

In:The Phonetics–Phonology Interface: Representations and methodologies
Edited by Joaquín Romero and María Riera
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 335] 2015
► pp. ix–xxii

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Editors’ introduction

Published online: 10 November 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.335.002int
References (34)
References
Abramson, Arthur. S. 2004. “The Plausibility of Phonetic Explanations of Tonogenesis”. From Traditional Phonology to Modern Speech Processing: Festschrift for Professor Wu Zongji’s 95th birthday ed. by Gunnar Fant, Hiroya Fujisaki, Jianfen Cao & Yi Xu, 17-29. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Best, Catherine T. 1994. “The Emergence of Native-Language Phonological Influences in Infants: A perceptual assimilation model”. The Development of Speech Perception ed. by Judith C. Goodman & Howard C. Nusbaum, 167-224. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bohn, Ocke-Schwen & Catherine T. Best. 2012. “Native-Language Phonetic and Phonological Influences on Perception of American English Approximants by Danish and German Listeners”. Journal of Phonetics 40:1.109-128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine & Louis Goldstein. 1989. “Articulatory Gestures as Phonological Units”. Phonology 6:2.201-251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. “Gestural Specification Using Dynamically-Defined Articulatory Structures”. Journal of Phonetics 18:3.299-320.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. “Articulatory Phonology: An overview”. Phonetica 49:3.155-180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byrd, Dani, Abigail Kaun, Shrikanth Narayanan & Elliot Saltzman. 2000. “Phrasal Signatures in Articulation”. Papers in Laboratory Phonology V: Acquisition and the lexicon ed. by Michael B. Broe & Janet B. Pierrehumbert, 70-87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byrd, Dani & Elliot Saltzman. 2003. “The Elastic Phrase: Modeling the dynamics of boundary-adjacent lengthening”. Journal of Phonetics 31:2.149-180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Costa, Albert & Núria Sebastián-Gallés. 2014. “How Does the Bilingual Experience Sculpt the Brain?”. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 15:5.336-345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durand, Jacques, Bernard Laks & Chantal Lyche, eds. 2009. Phonologie, variation et accents du français. Paris: Hermès.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, James E. 1995. “Second Language Speech Learning: Theory, findings, and problems”. Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in cross-language research ed. by Winifred Strange, 233-277. Baltimore, Md.: York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “Language Contact in Bilingualism: Phonetic system interactions”. Laboratory Phonology 9 ed. by Jennifer Cole & José Ignacio Hualde, 353-382. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. & Zenon W. Pylyshyn. 1981. “How Direct Is Visual Perception?: Some reflections on Gibson’s ‘ecological approach’”. Cognition 9:2.139-196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gafos, Adamantios I. 2002. “A Grammar of Gestural Coordination”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20:2.269-337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Dynamics in Grammar: Comment on Ladd and Ernestus & Baayen”. Laboratory Phonology 8: Varieties of phonological competence ed. by Louis Goldstein, Douglas H. Wahlen & Catherine T. Best, 51-79. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gafos, Adamantios I. & Stefan Benus. 2006. “Dynamics of Phonological Cognition”. Cognitive Science: A multidisciplinary journal 30:5.1-39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hallé, Pierre A., Catherine T. Best & Andrea Levitt. 1999. “Phonetic vs. Phonological Influences on French Listeners’ Perception of American English Approximants”. Journal of Phonetics 27:3.281-306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah & Cécile Fougeron. 2002. “Realizations of Accentual Phrase in French Intonation”. Probus 14:1.147-172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keating, Patricia A. 1988. “The Phonology-Phonetics Interface”. Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey I: Linguistic theory: Foundations ed. by Frederick J. Newmeyer, 281-301. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. “The Window Model of Coarticulation: Articulatory evidence”. Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the grammar and physics of speech ed. by John Kingston & Mary E. Beckman, 451-470. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kohler, Klaus. J., ed. 2012. “Bridging the Segment-Prosody Divide in Speech Production and Perception: Special topic issue”. Phonetica 69:1-2.5-6. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuhl, Patricia K. 1979. “Speech Perception in Early Infancy: Perceptual constancy for spectrally dissimilar vowel classes”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 66:6.1668-1679. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1983. “Perception of Auditory Equivalence Classes for Speech in Early Infancy”. Infant Behavior and Development 6:2-3.263-285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuhl, Patricia K., Jean E. Andruski, Inna A. Chistovich, Ludmilla A. Chistovich, Elena V. Kozhevnikova, Viktoria L. Ryskina, Elvira I. Stolyarova, Ulla Sundberg & Francisco Lacerda. 1997. “Cross-Language Analysis of Phonetic Units in Language Addressed to Infants”. Science 277.684-686. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladd, Robert D. 2006. “Distinctive Phones in Surface Representation”. Laboratory Phonology 8: Varieties of phonological competence ed. by Louis Goldstein, Douglas H. Wahlen & Catherine T. Best, 1-26. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mehler, Jacques, Emmanuel Dupoux, Thierry Nazzi & Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz. 1996. “Coping with Linguistic Diversity: The infant’s viewpoint”. Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition ed. by James L. Morgan & Katherine Demuth, 101-116. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pfitzinger, Hartmurt R. 2001. “Phonetische Analyse der Sprechgeschwindigkeit”. Forschungsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik und sprachliche Kommunikation der Universität München 38.117-264.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sebastián-Gallés, Núria & Salvador Soto-Faraco. 1999. “Online Processing of Native and Non-native Phonemic Contrasts in Early Bilinguals”. Cognition 72:2.111-123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stevens, Mary, John Hajek & Matthew Absalom. 2002. “Raddoppiamento Sintattico and Glottalization Phenomena in Italian: A first phonetic excursus”. Proceedings of the 9th Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, Melbourne , 3-5 December 2002, 154-159. Melbourne: Australian Speech Science and Technology Association.
van Heuven, Vincent & Judith Haan. 2000. “Phonetic Correlates of Statement versus Question Intonation in Dutch”. Intonation: Analysis, modelling and technology ed. by Antonis Botinis, 119-144. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. “Temporal development of interrogativity cues in Dutch”. Laboratory Phonology 7 ed. by Carlos Gussenhoven & Natasha Warner, 61-86. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vayra, Mario. 1994. “Phonetic Explanations in Phonology: Laryngealization as the case for glottal stops in Italian word-final stressed syllables”. Phonologica 1992: Proceedings of the 7th International Phonology Meeting, Krems an der Donau, 4-9 July 1992 ed. by Wolfgang U. Dressler, Martin Prinzhorn & John R. Rennison, 275-293. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Werker, Janet F. & R. C. Tees. 1984. “Cross-Language Speech Perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life”. Infant Behavior and Development 7:1.49-63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Werker, Janet F., Henny H. Yeung & Katherine A. Yoshida. 2012. “How Do Infants Become Experts at Native-Speech Perception?” Current Directions in Psychological Science 21:4.221-226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue