In:Historical Linguistics 2013: Selected papers from the 21st International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Oslo, 5-9 August 2013
Edited by Dag T.T. Haug
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 334] 2015
► pp. 257–280
The argument indexing of early Austronesian verbs
A reconstructional myth?
Published online: 1 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.334.14ros
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.334.14ros
This paper re-examines the Proto Austronesian (PAn) split-clitic construction, which has had a considerable influence on the reconstruction of Austronesian morphosyntactic history, suggests that it is a myth, and proposes alternative reconstructions, on the basis of data from Austronesian languages of Taiwan. At the same time the paper exemplifies and reinforces the observation by scholars of historical morphosyntax that cognate constructions across languages need to be identified not only on the basis of syntactic similarity but also on the basis of cognate morphology. Without the latter, there is no strong evidence of cognacy, as similar syntax may occur through parallel development, chance or contact.
References (54)
Adelaar, K. Alexander. 2011. Siraya: Retrieving the Phonology, Grammar and Lexicon of a Dormant Formosan Language. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Adelaar, K. Alexander & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann, eds. 2005. The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar. London: Routledge.
Aldridge, Edith. 2014. “Ergativity from Subjunctive in Austronesian Languages”. Paper presented to the 14th International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 4–6 June 2014.
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Thórhallur Eythórsson. 2012. “Reconstructing Syntax: Construction Grammar and the Comparative Method”. Sign-Based Construction Grammar ed. by Hans C. Boas & Ivan A. Sag, 257–308. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Billings, Loren & Daniel Kaufman. 2004. “Towards a Typology of Austronesian Pronominal Clisis”. Proceedings of the Eleventh meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association (= ZAS Papers in Linguistics 34), ed. by Paul Law, 15–29. Berlin: Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.
Blust, Robert A. 1977. “The Proto-Austronesian Pronouns and Austronesian Subgrouping: A Preliminary Report”. University of Hawaii Working Papers in Linguistics 9/2:1–15.
. 1999. “Subgrouping, Circularity and Extinction: Some Issues in Austronesian Comparative Linguistics”. Selected Papers from the Eighth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics (= Symposium Series of the Institute of Linguistics (Preparatory Office), Academia Sinica 1), ed by Elizabeth Zeitoun & Paul Jen-kuei Li, 31–94. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics (Preparatory Office), Academia Sinica.
Blust, Robert A. & Stephen Trussell. 2011. Austronesian Comparative Dictionary. [URL].
Chang, Anna Hsiouchuan. 2006. A Reference Grammar of Paiwan. PhD thesis, The Australian National University.
Chang, Henry Yungli. 2009. “Adverbial Verbs and Adverbial Compounds in Tsou: A Syntactic Analysis.” Oceanic Linguistics 48:439–476.
Early, Robert & John Whitehorn. 2003. One Hundred Paiwan Texts. (= Pacific Linguistics 542) Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Evans, Bethwyn. 1995. Reconstructing Object Markers in Oceanic Languages. BA Honours sub-thesis. Australian National University.
Ferrell, Raleigh. 1982. Paiwan Dictionary. (
= Pacific Linguistics C-73) Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Harris, Alice C. 2008. “Reconstruction in Syntax: Reconstruction of Patterns”. Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction ed. by Gisella Ferraresi & Maria Goldbach, 73–95. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 1996. “Person Marking and Grammatical Relations in Sulawesi”. Papers in Austronesian linguistics No. 3 (= Pacific Linguistics A-84) ed. by Hein Steinhauer, 115–136. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
. 2005. “The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar: Typological Characteristics”. Adelaar & Himmelmann, eds., 110–181.
Ho, Dah-an (Hé Dàān). 1998. “Táiwǎn Nándǎoyŭ de yŭyán guǎnxi” [Genetic relationships among the Formosan languages]. Chinese Studies 16:141–171.
Holmer, Arthur J. 1996. A Parametric Grammar of Seediq. (
= Travaux de L’Institut de Linguistique de Lund 30.) Lund: Lund University Press.
Holmer, Arthur & Loren Billings. 2014. “Clitic Pronouns in Seediq”. Papers from 12-ICAL, 2: Argument Realisations and Related Constructions in Austronesian Languages ed. by I Wayan Arka & N. L. K. Mas Indrawati, 131–141. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.
Huang, Shuanfan & Michael Tanangkingsing. 2011. “A Discourse Explanation of the Transitivity Phenomena in Kavalan, Squliq, and Tsou”. Oceanic Linguistics 50:93–119.
Huang, Wei-chen. 2012. A Study of Verbal Morphology in Puljetji Paiwan. MA thesis, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Kaufman, Daniel. 2008. “South Sulawesi Pronominal Clitics: Form, Function and Position”. Studies in Philippine Languages and Cultures 17:13–65.
Kikusawa, Ritsuko. 2003. “A New View of the Proto-Oceanic Pronominal System”. Oceanic Linguistics 42:161–186.
Li, Lilian Li-ying. 2010. Clitics in Nantou Isbukun Bunun (Austronesian). MA thesis, National Chi Nan University, Puli, Taiwan.
Næss, Åshild. 2013. “From Austronesian Voice to Oceanic Transitivity: Äiwoo as the ‘Missing Link’”. Oceanic Linguistics 52:106–124.
Næss, Åshild & Brenda H. Boerger. 2008. “Reefs-Santa Cruz as Oceanic: Evidence from the Verb Complex”. Oceanic Linguistics 47:186–213.
Palmer, Bill. 2011. “Subject-indexing and Possessive Morphology in Northwest Solomonic”. Linguistics 49:685–747.
Pecoraro, Ferdinando. 1979. Elements de grammaire taroko, precedes de la presentation de la vie et de la culture des taroko. Paris: Association Archipel.
Pires, Acrisio & Sarah G. Thomason. 2008. “How Much Syntactic Reconstruction is Possible?”. Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction, ed. by Gisella Ferraresi & Maria Goldbach, 27–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Reid, Lawrence A. & Hsiu-chuan Liao. 2004. “A Brief Syntactic Typology of Philippine Languages”. Language and Linguistics 5:433–490.
Ross, Malcolm. 1986. “A Genetic Grouping of Oceanic Languages in Bougainville and the Western Solomons”, FOCAL II: Papers from the Fourth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics (= Pacific Linguistics C-94) ed. by Paul Geraghty, Lois Carrington & S.A. Wurm, 75–200. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
. 2006. “Reconstructing the Case-Marking and Personal Pronoun Systems of Proto Austronesian”. Streams Converging into an Ocean: Festschrift in Honor of Professor Paul Jen-kuei Li on his 70th birthday (= Language and Linguistics Monograph Series W5) ed. by Henry Yungli Chang, Lillian M. Huang & Dah-an Ho, 521–564. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
. 2009. “Proto Austronesian Verbal Morphology: A Reappraisal”. Austronesian Historical Linguistics and Culture History: A Festschrift for Robert Blust (= Pacific Linguistics 601) ed. by Alexander Adelaar & Andrew Pawley, 295–326. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
. 2012a. “In Defense of Nuclear Austronesian (and against Tsouic)”. Language and Linguistics 13:1253–1330.
. 2012b. “Some Proto Austronesian Coronals Reexamined”. Ms., The Australian National University.
. 2013. “How Rukai became Accusatively Aligned”. Unpublished draft, Australian National University.
. 2015. “Revising the Reconstruction of Early Austronesian Personal Pronouns”. Papers from 12-ICAL, 3: Language change in Austronesian languages ed by Malcolm Ross & I Wayan Arka, 109–122. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.
Ross, Malcolm & Åshild Næss. 2007. “An Oceanic Origin for Äiwoo, the Language of the Reef Islands?”. Oceanic Linguistics 46:456–498.
Sagart, Laurent. 2004. “The Higher Phylogeny of Austronesian and the Position of Tai-Kadai”. Oceanic Linguistics 43:411–444.
Starosta, Stanley. 1988. The Case for Lexicase: An Outline of Lexicase Grammatical Theory. London and New York: Pinter.
Starosta, Stanley, Andrew Pawley & Lawrence A. Reid. 1981. “The Evolution of Focus in Austronesian”. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Bali. Published in Zeitoun ed., 2009:329–481.
. 1982. “The Evolution of Focus in Austronesian”. Papers from the Third International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, 2: Tracking the travellers (= Pacific Linguistics C-75) ed. by Amran Halim, Lois Carrington & S.A. Wurm, 145–170. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Teng, Stacy Fang-ching. 2008. A Reference Grammar of Puyuma, an Austronesian Language of Taiwan. (= Pacific Linguistics 595.) Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
. 2013. “Notes on Puyuma Preverbal Portmanteau Forms”. Unpublished draft, Academia Sinica.
Teng, Stacy Fang-ching & Elizabeth Zeitoun. 2014. ”Kanakanavu Personal Pronouns Revisited”. Unpublished ms, Academia Sinica.
Wolff, John U. 1996. “The Development of the Passive Verb with Pronominal Prefix in Western Austronesian Languages”. Reconstruction, Classification, Description: Festschrift in Honor of Isidore Dyen ed. by Bernd Nothofer, 15–40. Hamburg: Abera.
Yen, Doris Ching-jung. 2012. Clitics in Kavalan (East Formosan, Austronesian). MA thesis, National Chi Nan University, Puli, Taiwan.
Zeitoun, Elizabeth. 2005. “Tsou”. The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar, Adelaar & Himmelmann, eds. 259–290.
, ed. 2009. Formosan Linguistics: Stanley Starosta’s Contributions, vol. 2 (= Language and Linguistics Monograph Series C6-2.) Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
Zeitoun, Elizabeth & Stacy Fang-ching Teng. 2014. “The Position of Kanakanavu and Saaroa within the Formosan Languages Revisited”. Paper presented to the 14th International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 4–6 June 2014.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Daniels, Don, Danielle Barth & Wolfgang Barth
Daniels, Don
2017. A method for mitigating the problem of borrowing in syntactic reconstruction. Studies in Language 41:3 ► pp. 577 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
