In:Historical Linguistics 2013: Selected papers from the 21st International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Oslo, 5-9 August 2013
Edited by Dag T.T. Haug
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 334] 2015
► pp. 195–212
Differential Object Marking in Old Japanese
A corpus-based study
Published online: 1 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.334.11fre
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.334.11fre
Within the past few decades, various proposals have been made about marking of objects in Old Japanese (e.g., Matsunaga 1983, Motohashi 1989, Yanagida 2006, Kuroda 2008, Yanagida & Whitman 2009, Wrona & Frellesvig 2010, Kinsui 2011, Miyagawa 2012), but there is still no consensus about the exact circumstances determining when direct objects are bare or accusative case marked in Old Japanese. We use the material in the Oxford Corpus of Old Japanese to examine in detail the distribution of bare and accusative case marked objects in Old Japanese texts and show that Old Japanese had ‘differential object marking (DOM)’ associated with a specific/non-specific distinction (Yanagida & Whitman 2009). Thus, in Old Japanese, accusative case marked objects are specific, but bare objects are non-specific. This paper briefly discusses cases in which accusative case is dropped from specific objects.
References (16)
Dalrymple, Mary & Irina Nikolaeva. 2011. Objects and Information Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kinsui, Satoshi. 2011. “Tōgōron [Syntax]”. Bunpōshi [Historical Grammar ],ed. by Satoshi Kinsui, Yoshiyuki Takayama, Tomohide Kinuhata & Tomoko Okazaki, 77–166. Tokyo: Iwanami.
Kiss, Katalin E. 1993. “WH-movement and Specificity”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11:85–120. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki. 2008. “On the Syntax of Old Japanese”. Current Issues in the History and Structure of Japanese ed. by Bjarke Frellesvig, Masayoshi Shibatani & John Charles Smith, 263–317. Tokyo: Kurosio.
Matsunaga, Setsuko. 1983. “The Development of Case Marking in Japanese”. Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University.
Matsuo, Osamu. 1944. “Kyakugo hyōji no joshi ‘o’ ni tuite”. Kokugogaku Ronshū. ed. by Hashimoto Hakase Kanreki Kinenkai, 617–644. Tokyo: Iwanami.
. 1989. Structure and Case Marking in Japanese. Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 22. New York: Academic Press.
Motohashi, Tatsushi. 1989. Case Theory and the History of the Japanese Language. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona.
Pesetsky, David. 1987. “Wh-in-situ: Movement and Unselective Binding”. The representation of (In)definiteness, ed. by Eric J. Reuland & Alice G.B. ter Meulen, 98–129. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
Yanagida, Yuko. 2006. “Word Order and Clause Structure in Early Old Japanese”. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 15:37–68.
. 2007. “Miyagawa’s (1989) Exceptions: An Ergative Analysis”. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, vol.55:265–276, ed. by Yoichi Miyamoto. Cambridge: MIT.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Aldridge, Edith & Yuko Yanagida
Yanagida, Yuko
2018. Differential argument marking and object movement in Old Japanese. In Topics in Theoretical Asian Linguistics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 250], ► pp. 181 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.