Cover not available

In:Variation within and across Romance Languages: Selected papers from the 41st Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Ottawa, 5–7 May 2011
Edited by Marie-Hélène Côté and Eric Mathieu
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 333] 2014
► pp. 233–254

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

On subjunctives and islandhood

 | Ghent University
 | University of Geneva
Published online: 17 December 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.333.16bau
This article discusses the relation between selection, subjunctive mood and extraction facts. We show that the degree of permeability observed in subjunctive clauses with respect to, e.g., wh-extraction is apparent, and is only indirectly related to the indicative/subjunctive alternation. We examine different verb classes in French and show that the behavior of various types of wh-phrases in extraction contexts is not directly linked to the mood of the embedded clause. We therefore propose (i) that the indicative-subjunctive distribution is a property of predicates that has to be distinguished from the property involved in complementizer selection. In a nutshell, in French, the subjunctive-indicative alternation can be accounted for in terms of the emotive–cognitive property of the matrix predicate; and (ii) that islands effects, that is, the degree of permeability of the embedded clauses can be related to the properties of the selected complementizer. In other words, the possibilities of extraction of a wh-phrase from an embedded clause can be accounted for by the size of the complementizer that acts as a more or less strong blocker for wh-extraction from the clause it selects. We therefore propose that mood ‘selection’ and complementizer selection are two independent properties of the main predicate.
References (36)
References
Baunaz, Lena. 2011. The Grammar of French Quantification. Heidelberg: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “On the Various Sizes of Complementizers”. Probus. Volume 0, Issue 0, ISSN (Online) 1613-4079, ISSN (Print) 0921-4771, , April 2014.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baunaz, Lena & Genoveva Puskás. 2008. “Feature Stripping and Wh-movement in French and Hungarian”. Selected Proceedings of the 34th Incontro di Grammatica Generativa ed. by Paola Benincà, Federico Damonte & Nicoletta Penello. Special Issue of the Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 33.43–60. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beaver, David. 2010. “Have you Noticed that your Belly Button Lint Colour is Related to the Colour of your Clothing?” Presuppositions and Discourse: Essays offered to Hans Kamp ed. by Reyle Bäuerle, Uwe Reyle & Thomas E. Zimmermann, 65–99. Oxford: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Cuba, Carlos & Barbara Ürögdi. 2010. “Clearing up the ‘Facts’ on Complementation”. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 16:1.Article 6. [[URL]]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farkas, Donka & Anastasia Giannakidou. 1996. “How Clause-bounded is the Scope of Universals?” In Proceedings of SALT VI ed. by Teresa Gallway & Justin Spence, 35–52. Ithaca, N.Y.: CLC Publications Cornell University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faure, Richard. 2008. “Factifs cognitifs, factifs émotifs, liage bas et accommodation locale”. Verbum 28:4.415–431.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1998. The Landscape of Polarity Items. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Groningen.
. 2000. “Negative Concord and the Scope of Universals”. Transactions of the Philological Society 98.87–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “The Dependency of the Subjunctive Revisited: Temporal semantics and polarity”. Twists of Mood: The distribution and interpretation of indicative and subjunctive ed. by Josep Quer. Special issue of Lingua 119:12.1883–1908. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra & Fabio Pianesi. 2004. “Complementizer Deletion in Italian”. The Structure of CP and IP ed. by Luigi Rizzi, 190–210. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haverkate, Henk. 2002. The Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics of Spanish Mood. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan. 1975. “On Assertive Predicates”. Syntax and Semantics Vol. 4 ed. by John P. Kimball, 91–124. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri. 1971, “Some Observations on Factivity”. Papers in Linguistics 5.55–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul & Carol Kiparsky. 1970. “Fact”. Progress in Linguistics ed. by Manfried Bierwish & Karl Heidolph, 143–173. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Léger, Catherine. 2006. La complémentation de type phrastique des adjectifs en français. Thèse de doctorat, Université du Québec à Montréal.
Lasnik, Howard & Mamoru Saito. 1984. “On the Nature of Proper Government”. Linguistic Inquiry 15.235–289.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita & Leonardo Savoia. 2003. “The Nature of Complementizers”. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 28.87–110.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mørdrup, Ole. 1975. “Présuppositions, implications et verbes français”. Revue romane 10.125–157.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1987. “Wh-in-Situ: Movement and unselective binding”. The Representation of (In)definites ed. by Eric Reuland & Alice ter Meulen, 98–129. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana. 1992. “The Inherent Variability of the French subjunctive.” Theoretical Analyses in Romance Linguistics: Selected papers from the 19th Linguistics Symposium on Romance Languages ed. by Christiane Laeufer & Terrell A. Morgan, 235–263. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quer, Josep. 1998. Mood at the Interface. Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht University.
. 2009. “Twists of Mood: The distribution and interpretation of indicative and subjunctive”. Lingua 119.1779–1787. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. “Locality and Left Periphery”. Structures and Beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 3 ed. by Adriana Belletti, 223–251. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roussou, Anna. 2009. “In the Mood for Control”. Lingua 119. 1811–1836. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Selecting Complementizers”. Exploring the Left Periphery ed. by Kleanthes Grohmann & Ianthi M. Tsimpli. Special issue of Lingua 120:3.582–603.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe. 2005. “The Lazy Frenchman’s Approach to the Subjunctive”. Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2003: Selected papers from Going Romance 2003 ed. by Twan Geerts, Ivo van Ginneken & Haike Jakobs, 269–309. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suñer, Margarita. 1990. El tiempo en las subordinadas. Tiempo y aspecto en español ed. by Ignacio Bosque, 77–105. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Socanac, Tomislav. 2011. “Subjunctive in Serbian/Croatian”. Proceedings of SWIGG’11. Generative Grammar in Geneva 7.49–70.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Subjunctive Complements in South Slavic Languages: Distributional issues”. Proceedings of SWIGG’12. Generative Grammar in Geneva 8.1–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar

Starke, Michal. 2010. Towards an Elegant Solution to Language Variation: Variation reduces to the size of lexically stored trees. Ms., Barcelona. [URL]
Starke, Michal. 2001. Merge Dissolves into Move. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Geneva.
Tóth, Enikő. 2008. Mood Choice in Complement Clauses. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Villalta, Elisabeth. 2006. Context Dependence in the Interpretation of Questions and Subjunctives. Ph.D. dissertation, Universität Tübingen.
. 2008. “Mood and Gradability: An investigation of the subjunctive mood in Spanish”. Linguistics and Philosophy 31:4.467–522. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwarts, Frans. 1995. “Nonveridical Contexts”. Linguistic Analysis 25.286–312.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Fliessbach, Jan & Johanna Rockstroh
2025. Verb influence on French wh-placement: a parallel corpus study. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 21:2 ► pp. 361 ff. DOI logo
Romanova, Eugenia & Anna Oveshkova
2025. English Adjectival Predicates Taking Subjunctive Complements: What to Change in Curricula. Journal of Language and Education 11:1 ► pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Martínez Vera, Gabriel
2020. On Phase-over-Phase Configurations and phase collapsing:wh-extraction in V +de +CP clauses in Spanish. The Linguistic Review 37:3 ► pp. 393 ff. DOI logo
Quer, Josep
2017. Subjunctives. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue